Literature DB >> 24318508

Arthroscopic treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation by coracoclavicular ligament augmentation.

Xudong Liu1, Xiaoqiao Huangfu, Jinzhong Zhao.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Coracoclavicular (CC) ligament augmentation has been a method to treat acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation in recent years. The purpose of this paper is to describe our arthroscopic CC ligament augmentation technique in treating type III and V acute AC joint dislocations and to report the early clinical and radiological results.
METHODS: From 2010 to 2011, twelve patients suffering from acute type III or V AC joint dislocations were arthroscopically treated in our department, by CC ligament augmentation after AC joint reduction. The post-operative outcomes were assessed through physical examination, radiographic examination and the Constant-Murley Shoulder Score.
RESULTS: All patients post-operatively experienced anatomical reduction in their AC joint dislocation. No intraoperative complications occurred. At a mean follow-up at 24 months (ranging from 18 to 32 months), the mean Constant-Murley Shoulder Score significantly improved from 24.3 pre-operatively to 91.1 post-operatively. No neurovascular complications or secondary degenerative changes of the AC joint were detected in any of the patients. In one case, a second dislocation occurred 1 month post-operation because the patient had had another traumatic injury. This patient accepted a revision operation, but his AC joint eventually fixated into a subluxated position after his second injury.
CONCLUSION: Based on the resultant successful repair in all cases, the arthroscopic CC ligament augmentation method has thus far proven to be a safe and reliable technique for treatment of acute type III or V AC joint dislocation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The arthroscopic CC ligament augmentation with a flip button/polyethylene belt repair is an efficient method to treat acute type III and V AC joint dislocations which should be popularized. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24318508     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2800-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  25 in total

1.  Arthroscopically assisted anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using tendon graft.

Authors:  Yon-Sik Yoo; Young-Jin Seo; Kyu-Cheol Noh; Bishu Prasad Patro; Do-Young Kim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Anatomic reconstruction of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring tendon grafts.

Authors:  Kazunori Yasuda; Eiji Kondo; Hiroki Ichiyama; Nobuto Kitamura; Yoshie Tanabe; Harukazu Tohyama; Akio Minami
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Anatomical acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical comparison of reconstructive techniques of the acromioclavicular joint.

Authors:  Paul W Grutter; Steve A Petersen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Minimally invasive coracoclavicular ligament augmentation with a flip button/polydioxanone repair for treatment of total acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Mathias Wellmann; Thore Zantop; Wolf Petersen
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Suspension suture augmentation for repair of coracoclavicular ligament disruptions.

Authors:  Tsan-Wen Huang; Pang-Hsin Hsieh; Kuo-Chung Huang; Kuo-Chin Huang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular cerclage reconstruction for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

Authors:  Alexandre Lädermann; Maxime Grosclaude; Anne Lübbeke; Panayiotis Christofilopoulos; Richard Stern; Thierry Rod; Pierre Hoffmeyer
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Biomechanical evaluation of minimally invasive repairs for complete acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Mathias Wellmann; Thore Zantop; Andre Weimann; Michael J Raschke; Wolf Petersen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Biomechanical rationale for development of anatomical reconstructions of coracoclavicular ligaments after complete acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

Authors:  Ryan S Costic; Joanne E Labriola; Mark W Rodosky; Richard E Debski
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Evaluation of the coracoclavicular reconstruction using LARS artificial ligament in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Nan Lu; Lei Zhu; Tianwen Ye; Aimin Chen; Xi Jiang; Zhiling Zhang; Qinghua Zhu; Qinghe Guo; Di Yang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-06-30       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction with coracoacromial ligament transfer using the docking technique.

Authors:  Peter J Millett; Sepp Braun; Reuben Gobezie; Iván H Pacheco
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  [Therapy of acute acromioclavicular joint instability. Meta-analysis of arthroscopic/minimally invasive versus open procedures].

Authors:  T Helfen; G Siebenbürger; B Ockert; F Haasters
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Low prevalence of relevant associated articular lesions in patients with acute III-VI acromioclavicular joint injuries.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Ruiz Ibán; Juan Sarasquete; Mario Gil de Rozas; Pedro Costa; Juan Daniel Tovío; Eduardo Carpinteiro; Abdul Ilah Hachem; Manuel Perez España; Cristina Asenjo Gismero; Jorge Diaz Heredia; Miguel García Navlet
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Sports activity after anatomic acromioclavicular joint stabilisation with flip-button technique.

Authors:  Felix Porschke; Marc Schnetzke; Sara Aytac; Stefan Studier-Fischer; Paul Alfred Gruetzner; Thorsten Guehring
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  The prevalence of intraarticular associated lesions after acute acromioclavicular joint injuries is 20%. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Ruiz Ibán; Miguel Santiago Moreno Romero; Jorge Diaz Heredia; Raquel Ruiz Díaz; Alfonso Muriel; Jesus López-Alcalde
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Surgical treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: hook plate versus minimally invasive reconstruction.

Authors:  S Metzlaff; S Rosslenbroich; P H Forkel; B Schliemann; H Arshad; M Raschke; W Petersen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Biologic and synthetic ligament reconstructions achieve better functional scores compared to osteosynthesis in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Giuseppe Sircana; Valentina Cardona; Valeria Vismara; Alessandra Scaini; Andrea G Salvi; Stefano Galli; Giacomo Marchi; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  A New Coracoclavicular Guider for Minimally Invasive Anatomic Coracoclavicular Reconstruction with Two TightRope Systems in Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation.

Authors:  Yi Zhao; Lei Tan; Wan Tang; Tiecheng Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Transarticular fixation by hook plate versus coracoclavicular stabilization by single multistrand titanium cable for acute Rockwood grade-V acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a case-control study.

Authors:  You-Shui Gao; Yue-Lei Zhang; Zi-Sheng Ai; Yu-Qiang Sun; Chang-Qing Zhang; Wei Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.