Literature DB >> 25209209

Surgical treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: hook plate versus minimally invasive reconstruction.

S Metzlaff1, S Rosslenbroich2, P H Forkel3, B Schliemann2, H Arshad4, M Raschke2, W Petersen3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was performed to compare the clinical results of a minimally invasive technique for acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation repair with the traditional hook plate fixation.
METHODS: Forty-four patients with an acute (within 2 weeks after trauma) complete AC joint separation (35 male, nine female; median age 36.2 years, range 18-56) underwent surgical repair with either a minimally invasive AC joint repair or a conventional hook plate. Functional outcome was evaluated using the Constant-Murley Score (CMS), the TAFT score and the AC joint instability score (ACJI). Radiographic evaluation was performed with bilateral anterior-posterior (a.p.) stress and Alexander views.
RESULTS: All patients were available after a median follow-up of 32 months (range 24-51). There were no significant differences in the mean CMS, Taft score and the ACJI between the two groups. The radiological assessment revealed no significant difference in the coracoclavicular distance. In both groups, a slight loss of reduction was observed. Periarticular ossification was seen in 11 patients of the minimally invasive AC joint repair and eight patients of the hook plate group but this did not affect the final outcome. Hook plates were removed after a median interval of 11.9 weeks (range 10-13).
CONCLUSION: Good clinical results can be achieved with both minimally invasive AC joint repair and hook plate fixation. However, in the hook plate group a second operation is mandatory for plate removal. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acromioclavicular joint dislocation; Coracoclavicular cerclage; MINAR; Minimally invasive AC joint repair; Rockwood classification

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25209209     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3294-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  37 in total

1.  A cadaveric study examining acromioclavicular joint congruity after different methods of coracoclavicular loop repair.

Authors:  John E Baker; Gregg T Nicandri; Dale C Young; John R Owen; Jennifer S Wayne
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Which stabilization technique corrects anatomy best in patients with AC-separation? An experimental study.

Authors:  J Jerosch; T Filler; E Peuker; M Greig; U Siewering
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Minimally invasive coracoclavicular ligament augmentation with a flip button/polydioxanone repair for treatment of total acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Mathias Wellmann; Thore Zantop; Wolf Petersen
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  [Augmentation of the coraco-clavicular ligament suture. Comparison between wire cerclage, vicryl tape and PDS cord].

Authors:  G Blatter; G Meier
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Biomechanics of the coracoclavicular ligament complex and augmentations used in its repair and reconstruction.

Authors:  A R Motamedi; F T Blevins; M C Willis; T P McNally; M Shahinpoor
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Biomechanical evaluation of minimally invasive repairs for complete acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Mathias Wellmann; Thore Zantop; Andre Weimann; Michael J Raschke; Wolf Petersen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  The use of hook plate in type III and V acromio-clavicular Rockwood dislocations: clinical and radiological midterm results and MRI evaluation in 42 patients.

Authors:  Alexander Di Francesco; Carmine Zoccali; Olivo Colafarina; Renzo Pizzoferrato; Stefano Flamini
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations.

Authors:  Markus Scheibel; Silvia Dröschel; Christian Gerhardt; Natascha Kraus
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  [Arthroscopically assisted reduction of acute acromioclavicular joint separations: comparison of clinical and radiological results of single versus double TightRope™ technique].

Authors:  T Patzer; C Clauss; C A Kühne; E Ziring; T Efe; S Ruchholtz; D Mann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Repair of complete acromioclavicular separations using the acromioclavicular-hook plate.

Authors:  E Sim; N Schwarz; K Höcker; A Berzlanovich
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  [Injuries of the acromioclavicular joint: Hook plate versus arthroscopy].

Authors:  G Jensen; A Ellwein; C Voigt; J C Katthagen; H Lill
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  [Therapy of acute acromioclavicular joint instability. Meta-analysis of arthroscopic/minimally invasive versus open procedures].

Authors:  T Helfen; G Siebenbürger; B Ockert; F Haasters
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  Comparison of surgical outcomes between fixation with hook plate and loop suspensory fixation for acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alisara Arirachakaran; Manusak Boonard; Peerapong Piyapittayanun; Vajarin Phiphobmongkol; Kornkit Chaijenkij; Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-06-22

Review 4.  [Current aspects and new techniques in dislocation of the shoulder joint].

Authors:  J Abel; M A Zumstein; L Bolliger; M O Schär
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Comparing mini-open and arthroscopic acromioclavicular joint repair: functional results and return to sport.

Authors:  M Faggiani; G P Vasario; L Mattei; M J Calò; F Castoldi
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-06-10

Review 6.  Biologic and synthetic ligament reconstructions achieve better functional scores compared to osteosynthesis in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Giuseppe Sircana; Valentina Cardona; Valeria Vismara; Alessandra Scaini; Andrea G Salvi; Stefano Galli; Giacomo Marchi; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  PREFERED SURGICAL TECHNIQUE USED BY ORTHOPEDISTS IN ACUTE ACROMIOCLAVICULAR DISLOCATION.

Authors:  Alexandre Yukio Nishimi; Demetrio Simão Arbex; Diogo Lucas Campos Martins; Carlos Vinicius Buarque DE Gusmão; Roberto Rangel Bongiovanni; Luciano Pascarelli
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.513

8.  New quantitative radiographic parameters for vertical and horizontal instability in acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

Authors:  Matthias A Zumstein; Philippe Schiessl; Benedikt Ambuehl; Lilianna Bolliger; Johannes Weihs; Martin H Maurer; Beat K Moor; Michael Schaer; Sumit Raniga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Comparison of Short-Term Clinical Outcomes of Hook Plate and Continuous Loop Double Endobutton Fixations in Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation.

Authors:  Hasan Taleb; Ahmadreza Afshar; Mohammad J Shariyate; Ali Tabrizi
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-11

10.  Rockwood Grade-III Acromioclavicular Joint Separation: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Treatment Options.

Authors:  Sreten Franovic; Alex Pietroski; Noah Kuhlmann; Talal Bazzi; Yang Zhou; Stephanie Muh
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2021-05-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.