Literature DB >> 23812536

Evaluation of the coracoclavicular reconstruction using LARS artificial ligament in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Nan Lu1, Lei Zhu, Tianwen Ye, Aimin Chen, Xi Jiang, Zhiling Zhang, Qinghua Zhu, Qinghe Guo, Di Yang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The most appropriate procedure for surgical treatment of severe acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation was still not clear. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of coracoclavicular (CC) reconstruction with ligament augmentation and reconstruction system (LARS) artificial ligaments for the treatment of acute complete AC joint dislocation.
METHODS: Twenty-four patients (16 male and 8 female, ages ranged from 21 to 45) with acute complete AC joint dislocations were treated with CC reconstruction using LARS artificial ligaments. All these dislocations were unstable injuries. Clinical evaluation was used by the Constant scores and VAS. The radiographic evaluation consisted of Zanca radiographs for bilateral AC joint and axillary radiographs for the injured shoulder.
RESULTS: All patients had follow-up times of 36 months (range 6-60). The Constant scores rose from 62.3 ± 6.9 preoperatively to 94.5 ± 9.3 at final evaluation (P < 0.05). Preoperative VAS scores were 5.1 ± 1.7, and the VAS scores at the last review were 0.7 ± 1.4 (P < 0.05). Follow-up radiographs showed anatomical reduction in 20 patients and slight loss of reduction in 4 patients. Calcification of CC ligament in 4 patients, degenerative change around the AC joint in 2 patient and clavicular osteolysis around screws in one patient were found.
CONCLUSIONS: LARS artificial ligament for reconstruction of CC can provide immediate stability and allow early shoulder mobilization with good functional results and few complications. This procedure was an effective and safe method to treat grade III and more AC joint dislocations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23812536     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2582-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  20 in total

1.  Clavicular nonunion. Complication with the use of mersilene tape.

Authors:  J R Martell
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  A biomechanical evaluation of an anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Augustus D Mazzocca; Stephen A Santangelo; Sean T Johnson; Clifford G Rios; Mark L Dumonski; Robert A Arciero
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Four-strand hamstring tendon autograft versus LARS artificial ligament for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Zhong-tang Liu; Xian-long Zhang; Yao Jiang; Bing-Fang Zeng
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder.

Authors:  C R Constant; A H Murley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint. An end-result study.

Authors:  T N Taft; F C Wilson; J W Oglesby
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Surgical outcome following arthroscopic fixation of acromioclavicular joint disruption with the tightrope device.

Authors:  Eric Thiel; Amar Mutnal; Gregory J Gilot
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 1.390

Review 7.  Hook plate fixation of acute displaced lateral clavicle fractures: mid-term results and a brief literature overview.

Authors:  Davut Tiren; Alexander J M van Bemmel; Dingeman J Swank; Frits M van der Linden
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations.

Authors:  Markus Scheibel; Silvia Dröschel; Christian Gerhardt; Natascha Kraus
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Acromioclavicular dislocation Rockwood III-V: results of early versus delayed surgical treatment.

Authors:  Olaf Rolf; Andreas Hann von Weyhern; Alexander Ewers; Thomas Dirk Boehm; Frank Gohlke
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Suture repair using loop technique in cases of acute complete acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Mohamed Taha El Shewy; Hatem El Azizi
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2011-02-17
View more
  13 in total

1.  Three intrasubstance failures of a LARS™ ligament used for ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  V Ramsingh; A D Yewlett; H C Pullen
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction with the LARS ligament in professional versus non-professional athletes.

Authors:  Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Christopher Manning; Philip Wright; Alberto Grassi; Stefano Zaffagnini; Lennard Funk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction.

Authors:  Anthony J Scillia; E Lyle Cain
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-12-28

4.  Sports activity after anatomic acromioclavicular joint stabilisation with flip-button technique.

Authors:  Felix Porschke; Marc Schnetzke; Sara Aytac; Stefan Studier-Fischer; Paul Alfred Gruetzner; Thorsten Guehring
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Arthroscopic treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation by coracoclavicular ligament augmentation.

Authors:  Xudong Liu; Xiaoqiao Huangfu; Jinzhong Zhao
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Clinical and radiological results after coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation using three different techniques. A retrospective study.

Authors:  Alberto Vascellari; Stefano Schiavetti; Giuseppe Battistella; Enrico Rebuzzi; Nicolò Coletti
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2015-11-03

Review 7.  Biologic and synthetic ligament reconstructions achieve better functional scores compared to osteosynthesis in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Giuseppe Sircana; Valentina Cardona; Valeria Vismara; Alessandra Scaini; Andrea G Salvi; Stefano Galli; Giacomo Marchi; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Acromion Clavicular Joint Reconstruction with LARS Ligament in Acute Dislocation.

Authors:  Alessandro Geraci; Alberto Riccardi; Isabella Monia Montagner; Dario Pilla; Lawrece Camarda; Antonio D'Arienzo; Michele D'arienzo
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-03

9.  Surgical treatment of acute and chronic AC joint dislocations: Five-year experience with conventional and modified LARS fixation by a single surgeon.

Authors:  Yassine Ochen; Reinier B Beks; Benjamin L Emmink; Philippe Wittich; Detlef van der Velde; R Marijn Houwert; Jort Keizer
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-08-14

10.  Transarticular fixation by hook plate versus coracoclavicular stabilization by single multistrand titanium cable for acute Rockwood grade-V acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a case-control study.

Authors:  You-Shui Gao; Yue-Lei Zhang; Zi-Sheng Ai; Yu-Qiang Sun; Chang-Qing Zhang; Wei Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.