Literature DB >> 24318319

Prospective randomised controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus a sliding hip screw for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur.

Ioannis Aktselis1, Constantine Kokoroghiannis, Evaggelos Fragkomichalos, Georgios Koundis, Anastasios Deligeorgis, Emmanouil Daskalakis, John Vlamis, Nikolaos Papaioannou.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this prospective randomised trial was to assess whether an intramedullary nail is superior to a sliding hip screw in the treatment of multifragmentary intertrochanteric fractures
METHODS: Eighty patients with a 31-A2.2 or A2.3 Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) intertrochanteric fracture were randomly allocated to fixation with either the Gamma nail or the AMBI sliding hip screw device.
RESULTS: All patients were followed up at one, three, six and 12 months postoperatively, except for nine who died. There was no statistical difference in Parker mobility score between groups. The Gamma nail group had significantly higher Barthel Index and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) scores than the AMBI group at 12 months. At the same time, the EQ-5D score had returned to its pre-operative values in the Gamma nail group but not in the AMBI group. There were no differences in mortality, radiation time and hospital stay. Duration of the operation, incision length and hip pain occurrence were significantly less in the Gamma nail group.
CONCLUSIONS: Few failures occur when unstable 31-A2.2 and A2.3 AO/OTA fractures are fixed with a sliding hip screw. Nevertheless, an intramedullary nail seems superior in reconstituting patients to their pre-operative state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24318319      PMCID: PMC3890147          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-2196-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  40 in total

Review 1.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials.

Authors:  D Moher; K F Schulz; D G Altman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Failure of intertrochanteric fracture fixation with a dynamic hip screw in relation to pre-operative fracture stability and osteoporosis.

Authors:  W Y Kim; C H Han; J I Park; J Y Kim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Reverse obliquity fractures of the intertrochanteric region of the femur.

Authors:  G J Haidukewych; T A Israel; D J Berry
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Prospective randomized controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus dynamic screw and plate for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur.

Authors:  C I Adams; C M Robinson; C M Court-Brown; M M McQueen
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Intramedullary hip screw versus sliding hip screw for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  P Harrington; A Nihal; A K Singhania; F R Howell
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  Preoperative classification assessment reliability and influence on the length of intertrochanteric fracture operations.

Authors:  Jing Shen; FangKe Hu; LiHai Zhang; PeiFu Tang; ZhengGang Bi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Pertrochanteric fractures: is there an advantage to an intramedullary nail?: a randomized, prospective study of 206 patients comparing the dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail.

Authors:  Marc Saudan; Anne Lübbeke; Christophe Sadowski; Nicolas Riand; Richard Stern; Pierre Hoffmeyer
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Intertrochanteric fractures: comparison between two different locking nails.

Authors:  Carmelo D'Arrigo; Alessandro Carcangiu; Dario Perugia; Simone Scapellato; Raffaella Alonzo; Silvia Frontini; Andrea Ferretti
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-10-28       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Femoral neck fractures in the elderly: functional outcome and quality of life according to EuroQol.

Authors:  Jan Tidermark; Niklas Zethraeus; Olle Svensson; Hans Törnkvist; Sari Ponzer
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  A randomized study of the compression hip screw and Gamma nail in 426 fractures.

Authors:  Leif Ahrengart; Hans Törnkvist; Per Fornander; Karl-Göran Thorngren; Lauri Pasanen; Per Wahlström; Seppo Honkonen; Urban Lindgren
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  29 in total

1.  A comparative study between multiple cannulated screws and dynamic hip screw for fixation of femoral neck fracture in adults.

Authors:  Babak Siavashi; Arash Aalirezaei; Mersad Moosavi; Mohammad Reza Golbakhsh; Dariush Savadkoohi; Mohammad Javad Zehtab
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Letter regarding article by Li AB et al.: intramedullary and extramedullary fixations for the treatment of unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Hong-Bin Guo; Hong-Bo He
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Is rotation the mode of failure in pertrochanteric fractures fixed with nails? Theoretical approach and illustrative cases.

Authors:  C Kokoroghiannis; D Vasilakos; K Zisis; G Dimitriou; E Pappa; D Evangelopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-09-20

4.  Effects of a simple home exercise program and vitamin D supplementation on health-related quality of life after a hip fracture: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  K Renerts; K Fischer; B Dawson-Hughes; E J Orav; G Freystaetter; H-P Simmen; H-C Pape; A Egli; R Theiler; H A Bischoff-Ferrari
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Cephalomedullary nailing versus sliding hip screws for Intertrochanteric and basicervical hip fractures: a propensity-matched study of short-term outcomes in over 17,000 patients.

Authors:  Jared A Warren; Kavin Sundaram; Robert Hampton; John McLaughlin; Brendan Patterson; Carlos A Higuera; Nicolas S Piuzzi
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-09-05

6.  A simple reproducible technique for the retrieval of broken proximal femoral blades, a technical note and review of literature.

Authors:  Mohamed A Imam; Ziad Harb; David Elliott
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-10-13

7.  Loss of offset after pertrochanteric hip fractures affects hip function one year after surgery with a short intramedullary nail. A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Max Gordon; Per-Olov Berntsson; Erik Sjölund; Yilmaz Demir; Carl Johan Hedbeck; André Stark; Olof Sköldenberg
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Intramedullary and extramedullary fixations for the treatment of unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  A-Bing Li; Wei-Jiang Zhang; Jie Wang; Wei-Jun Guo; Xin-Hua Wang; You-Ming Zhao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  Clinical Management of Osteoporotic Fractures.

Authors:  Adam Z Khan; Richard D Rames; Anna N Miller
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.096

10.  Metabolic Shock in Elderly Pertrochanteric or Intertrochanteric Surgery. Comparison of Three Surgical Methods. Is there a Much Safer?

Authors:  Gómez-Garrido David; Bisaccia Michele; Ripani Umberto; Florin Cioancă; Schiavone Andrea; Ciotta Alfonso; Ibañéz-Vicente Cristina; Medina-Lorca Maria; Herrera-Molepecers Juan Antonio; Rollo Giuseppe; Meccariello Luigi
Journal:  Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2020-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.