Literature DB >> 23254857

Preoperative classification assessment reliability and influence on the length of intertrochanteric fracture operations.

Jing Shen1, FangKe Hu, LiHai Zhang, PeiFu Tang, ZhengGang Bi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The accuracy of intertrochanteric fracture classification is important; indeed, the patient outcomes are dependent on their classification. The aim of this study was to use the AO classification system to evaluate the variation in classification between X-ray and computed tomography (CT)/3D CT images. Then, differences in the length of surgery were evaluated based on two examinations.
METHODS: Intertrochanteric fractures were reviewed and surgeons were interviewed. The rates of correct discrimination and misclassification (overestimates and underestimates) probabilities were determined. The impact of misclassification on length of surgery was also evaluated.
RESULTS: In total, 370 patents and four surgeons were included in the study. All patients had X-ray images and 210 patients had CT/3D CT images. Of them, 214 and 156 patients were treated by intramedullary and extramedullary fixation systems, respectively. The mean length of surgery was 62.1 ± 17.7 min. The overall rate of correct discrimination was 83.8 % and in the classification of A1, A2 and A3 were 80.0, 85.7 and 82.4 %, respectively. The rate of misclassification showed no significant difference between stable and unstable fractures (21.3 vs 13.1 %, P = 0.173). The overall rates of overestimates and underestimates were significantly different (5 vs 11.25 %, P = 0.041). Subtracting the rate of overestimates from underestimates had a positive correlation with prolonged surgery and showed a significant difference with intramedullary fixation (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Classification based on the AO system was good in terms of consistency. CT/3D CT examination was more reliable and more helpful for preoperative assessment, especially for performance of an intramedullary fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23254857      PMCID: PMC3609981          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-012-1748-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  17 in total

1.  Epidemiology of hip fractures in Austria: evidence for a change in the secular trend.

Authors:  H P Dimai; A Svedbom; A Fahrleitner-Pammer; T Pieber; H Resch; E Zwettler; M Chandran; F Borgström
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Telling the bones.

Authors:  C L Colton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-05

3.  Fracture classification systems: do they work and are they useful?

Authors:  A H Burstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Classifying intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur: does experience matter?

Authors:  Wayne Fung; Anders Jonsson; Volker Buhren; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.927

5.  The comparison of two classifications for trochanteric femur fractures: the AO/ASIF classification and the Jensen classification.

Authors:  D van Embden; S J Rhemrev; S A G Meylaerts; G R Roukema
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  Nail or plate fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: changing pattern of practice. A review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Database.

Authors:  Jeffrey O Anglen; James N Weinstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Classification of intertrochanteric fractures with computed tomography: a study of intraobserver and interobserver variability and prognostic value.

Authors:  Cary B Chapman; Mauricio F Herrera; Gil Binenbaum; Michael Schweppe; Ronald B Staron; Frieda Feldman; Melvin P Rosenwasser
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2003-09

8.  Is a sliding hip screw or im nail the preferred implant for intertrochanteric fracture fixation?

Authors:  Brian Aros; Anna N A Tosteson; Daniel J Gottlieb; Kenneth J Koval
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Surgical management of hip fractures: an evidence-based review of the literature. II: intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Kevin Kaplan; Ryan Miyamoto; Brett R Levine; Kenneth A Egol; Joseph D Zuckerman
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 10.  Conservative versus operative treatment for hip fractures in adults.

Authors:  Helen H G Handoll; Martyn J Parker
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-07-16
View more
  6 in total

1.  Prospective randomised controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus a sliding hip screw for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur.

Authors:  Ioannis Aktselis; Constantine Kokoroghiannis; Evaggelos Fragkomichalos; Georgios Koundis; Anastasios Deligeorgis; Emmanouil Daskalakis; John Vlamis; Nikolaos Papaioannou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Assessment of Usefulness of CT Scan in AO Classification of Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Rahul Yogendra Raj; Amit Srivastava; Aditya Nath Aggarwal; Rehan Ul Haq
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-10-03       Impact factor: 1.033

3.  Does Computed Tomography Improve Reproducibility in the Classification of Transtrochanteric Fractures?

Authors:  Murilo Alexandre; Giancarlo Cavalli Polesello; Edio Cavassani Neto; Nayra Deise Dos Anjos Rabelo; Marcelo Cavalheiro de Queiroz; Walter Ricioli Junior
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-08-20

4.  Three-dimensional mapping of intertrochanteric fracture lines.

Authors:  Ming Li; Zhi-Rui Li; Jian-Tao Li; Ming-Xing Lei; Xiu-Yun Su; Guo-Qi Wang; Hao Zhang; Gao-Xiang Xu; Peng Yin; Li-Cheng Zhang; Pei-Fu Tang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Evaluation of the Inter and Intra-Observer Reliability of the AO Classification of Intertrochanteric Fractures and the Device Choice (DHS, PFNA, and DCS) of Fixations.

Authors:  Mohamed Zarie; Mohamed Farah Mohamoud; Amir Reza Farhoud; Nima Bagheri; Furqan Mohammed Yaseen Khan; Mahdi Heshmatifar; Hadi Klantar
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2020-09

6.  The Role of Preoperative Computed Tomography on the Quality of Reduction and Outcomes in Intertrochanteric Fracture: A Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Tao Ma; Lin-Jie Hao; Peng-Fei Wen; Ya-Kang Wang; Hu Wang; Bin-Fei Zhang; Yu-Min Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.