Literature DB >> 24318085

Framework to assess the effects of using patient-reported outcome measures in chronic care management.

Maria-Jose Santana1, David Feeny.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The inclusion of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the routine clinical care of chronically ill patients has the potential to add valuable information about the impact of the disease and its treatment and promotes effective patient self-management in which patients become more active participants in their own care. PROMs provide clinicians with timely information on patients' symptoms as well as functional and emotional status. PROMs are a useful tool for enhancing patient-clinician communication.
METHODS: We develop a conceptual framework describing the potential effects of the use of PROMs in chronic care management. The framework summarizes insights from the methods for evaluating the clinical effectiveness and methods for the health technology assessment of diagnostic technologies and results from the relevant studies.
RESULTS: The framework describes potential effects, from proximal to distal, including communication (patient-clinician, patient-relative, clinician-clinician, and clinician-relative), engaging patients in shared clinical decision making, patient management (clinician management and patient self-management), and patient outcomes. Important potential effects also include enhancement in patient activation as well as improvements in clinician and patient satisfaction, and patient adherence to recommended treatment. Previous frameworks have described patient-physician communication, patient satisfaction, and health outcomes. Our framework adds unique domains, including patient engagement, patient activation, shared clinical decision making, and patient self-management.
CONCLUSIONS: The framework can be used as a tool to guide the development of interventions to improve chronic care management through the use of PROMs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24318085     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-013-0596-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  54 in total

Review 1.  The enduring and evolving nature of the patient-physician relationship.

Authors:  D Roter
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2000-01

2.  The use of quality of life data in clinical practice.

Authors:  J Morris; D Perez; B McNoe
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Symone B Detmar; Martin J Muller; Jan H Schornagel; Lidwina D V Wever; Neil K Aaronson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review.

Authors:  Susan Marshall; Kirstie Haywood; Ray Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  Prevalence of multiple chronic conditions in the United States' Medicare population.

Authors:  Kathleen M Schneider; Brian E O'Donnell; Debbie Dean
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Impact of patient-reported outcomes in oncology: a longitudinal analysis of patient-physician communication.

Authors:  Elena E Takeuchi; Ada Keding; Noha Awad; Ursula Hofmann; Lyndsay J Campbell; Peter J Selby; Julia M Brown; Galina Velikova
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  The expanded Chronic Care Model: an integration of concepts and strategies from population health promotion and the Chronic Care Model.

Authors:  Victoria J Barr; Sylvia Robinson; Brenda Marin-Link; Lisa Underhill; Anita Dotts; Darlene Ravensdale; Sandy Salivaras
Journal:  Hosp Q       Date:  2003

8.  The global burden of chronic diseases: overcoming impediments to prevention and control.

Authors:  Derek Yach; Corinna Hawkes; C Linn Gould; Karen J Hofman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-06-02       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why?

Authors:  Joanne Greenhalgh
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Galina Velikova; Laura Booth; Adam B Smith; Paul M Brown; Pamela Lynch; Julia M Brown; Peter J Selby
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  56 in total

Review 1.  A Review of HIV-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Kim Engler; David Lessard; Bertrand Lebouché
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  A qualitative evaluation of Veterans Health Administration's implementation of measurement-based care in behavioral health.

Authors:  Stephanie Brooks Holliday; Kimberly A Hepner; Carrie M Farmer; Christopher Ivany; Praise Iyiewuare; Pearl McGee-Vincent; Shannon McCaslin; Craig S Rosen
Journal:  Psychol Serv       Date:  2019-08-19

Review 3.  Can the Routine Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Improve the Delivery of Person-Centered Diabetes Care? A Review of Recent Developments and a Case Study.

Authors:  Soren E Skovlund; T H Lichtenberg; D Hessler; N Ejskjaer
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 4.810

4.  Feedback to Patients About Patient-reported Outcomes Does Not Improve Empowerment or Satisfaction.

Authors:  Lisette Ackermans; Michiel G Hageman; A H Bos; Daniel Haverkamp; Vanessa A B Scholtes; Rudolf W Poolman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  How does pain experience relate to the need for pain relief? A secondary exploratory analysis in a large sample of cancer patients.

Authors:  Anna Thit Johnsen; Morten A Petersen; Claire F Snyder; Lise Pedersen; Mogens Groenvold
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Health-related quality of life among children, young people and adults with esophageal atresia: a review of the literature and recommendations for future research.

Authors:  Michaela Dellenmark-Blom; John Eric Chaplin; Vladimir Gatzinsky; Linus Jönsson; Kate Abrahamson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  Optimizing quality of life in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Authors:  Mirjam J G van Manen; J J Miranda Geelhoed; Nelleke C Tak; Marlies S Wijsenbeek
Journal:  Ther Adv Respir Dis       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 4.031

8.  Living with Intoxication-Type Inborn Errors of Metabolism: A Qualitative Analysis of Interviews with Paediatric Patients and Their Parents.

Authors:  Nina A Zeltner; Markus A Landolt; Matthias R Baumgartner; Sarah Lageder; Julia Quitmann; Rachel Sommer; Daniela Karall; Chris Mühlhausen; Andrea Schlune; Sabine Scholl-Bürgi; Martina Huemer
Journal:  JIMD Rep       Date:  2016-08-13

9.  The Validity of a New Structured Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Scale (SAGIS) for Evaluating Symptoms in the Clinical Setting.

Authors:  N A Koloski; M Jones; J Hammer; M von Wulffen; A Shah; H Hoelz; M Kutyla; D Burger; N Martin; S R Gurusamy; N J Talley; G Holtmann
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  The effect of feedback regarding coping strategies and illness behavior on hand surgery patient satisfaction and communication: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jos J Mellema; Casey M O'Connor; Celeste L Overbeek; Michiel G Hageman; David Ring
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2015-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.