Literature DB >> 31424241

A qualitative evaluation of Veterans Health Administration's implementation of measurement-based care in behavioral health.

Stephanie Brooks Holliday1, Kimberly A Hepner1, Carrie M Farmer1, Christopher Ivany1, Praise Iyiewuare1, Pearl McGee-Vincent2, Shannon McCaslin2, Craig S Rosen2.   

Abstract

Measurement-based care (MBC) in behavioral health involves the repeated collection of patient-reported data that is used to track progress, inform care, and engage patients in shared decision making about their treatment. Research suggests that MBC increases the quality and effectiveness of mental health care. However, there can be challenges to implementing MBC, such as time burden, lack of resources to support MBC, and clinician attitudes. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is currently undertaking a multiphase MBC roll-out, the first phase of which included 59 sites across the country. The present study examined implementation of this initiative in an effort to learn more about the process of implementation, including best practices, challenges, and innovations. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 20 MBC site champions and 60 staff members from 25 VHA medical centers across the country. Qualitative data analysis was conducted to identify key themes related to MBC implementation. Results were described for 3 components of MBC implementation: preparing for implementation, administering measures, and using and sharing data. Training and staff buy-in were key to the preparation phase. Staff members reported a variety of methods and frequencies for the collection of MBC data, with many staff members identifying a need to streamline the collection process. Staff members reported using data to track progress and adjust treatment with patients. Efforts to use data on a programmatic level were identified as a next step. Innovative solutions across clinics and sites are described in an effort to inform future MBC implementation, both within and outside of VHA. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31424241      PMCID: PMC7028496          DOI: 10.1037/ser0000390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Serv        ISSN: 1541-1559


  27 in total

1.  Improving psychotherapy outcome: the use of immediate electronic feedback and revised clinical support tools.

Authors:  Karstin Slade; Michael J Lambert; S Cory Harmon; David W Smart; Russ Bailey
Journal:  Clin Psychol Psychother       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct

2.  Concordance between PHQ-9 scores and patients' experiences of depression: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Alice Malpass; Alison Shaw; David Kessler; Deborah Sharp
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  System-Wide Implementation of Routine Outcome Monitoring and Measurement Feedback System in a National Network of Operational Stress Injury Clinics.

Authors:  David F Ross; Gabriela Ionita; Shannon Wiltsey Stirman
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2016-11

4.  The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test.

Authors:  K Bush; D R Kivlahan; M B McDonell; S D Fihn; K A Bradley
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1998-09-14

5.  Development and initial evaluation of the Brief Addiction Monitor (BAM).

Authors:  John S Cacciola; Arthur I Alterman; Dominick Dephilippis; Michelle L Drapkin; Charles Valadez; Natalie C Fala; David Oslin; James R McKay
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2012-08-14

6.  The effectiveness of clinician feedback in the treatment of depression in the community mental health system.

Authors:  Mary Beth Connolly Gibbons; John E Kurtz; Donald L Thompson; Rachel A Mack; Jacqueline K Lee; Aileen Rothbard; Susan V Eisen; Robert Gallop; Paul Crits-Christoph
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2015-06-08

7.  Measurement-based care in psychiatric practice: a policy framework for implementation.

Authors:  Kelli Jane K Harding; A John Rush; Melissa Arbuckle; Madhukar H Trivedi; Harold Alan Pincus
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 4.384

8.  Why don't psychiatrists use scales to measure outcome when treating depressed patients?

Authors:  Mark Zimmerman; Joseph B McGlinchey
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 4.384

9.  Challenges in the Implementation of Measurement Feedback Systems.

Authors:  Kim de Jong
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2016-05

10.  Use of the Blue Button Online Tool for Sharing Health Information: Qualitative Interviews With Patients and Providers.

Authors:  Dawn M Klein; Gemmae M Fix; Timothy P Hogan; Steven R Simon; Kim M Nazi; Carolyn L Turvey
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.