PURPOSE: Recently introduced ultrafast cardiac SPECT cameras with cadmium zinc telluride-based (CZT) detectors may provide superior image quality allowing faster acquisition with reduced radiation doses. Although the level of concordance between conventional SPECT and invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement has been studied, that between FFR and CZT-based SPECT is not yet known. Therefore, we aimed to assess the level of concordance between CZT SPECT and FFR in a large patient group with stable coronary artery disease. METHODS: Both invasive FFR and myocardial perfusion imaging with a CZT-based SPECT camera, using Tc-tetrofosmin as tracer, were performed in 100 patients with stable angina and intermediate grade stenosis on invasive coronary angiography. A cut-off value of <0.75 was used to define abnormal FFR. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 64 ± 11 years, and 64 % were men. SPECT demonstrated ischaemia in 31 % of the patients, and 20 % had FFR <0.75. The concordance between CZT SPECT and FFR was 73 % on a per-patient basis and 79 % on a per-vessel basis. Discordant findings were more often seen in older patients and were mainly (19 %) the result of ischaemic SPECT findings in patients with FFR ≥ 0.75, whereas only 8 % had an abnormal FFR without ischaemia as demonstrated by CZT SPECT. CONCLUSION: Only 20 - 30 % of patients with intermediate coronary stenoses had significant ischaemia as assessed by CZT SPECT or invasive FFR. CZT SPECT showed a modest degree of concordance with FFR, which is comparable with previous results with conventional SPECT. Further investigations are particularly necessary in patients with normal SPECT and abnormal FFR, especially to determine whether these patients should undergo revascularization.
PURPOSE: Recently introduced ultrafast cardiac SPECT cameras with cadmium zinc telluride-based (CZT) detectors may provide superior image quality allowing faster acquisition with reduced radiation doses. Although the level of concordance between conventional SPECT and invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement has been studied, that between FFR and CZT-based SPECT is not yet known. Therefore, we aimed to assess the level of concordance between CZT SPECT and FFR in a large patient group with stable coronary artery disease. METHODS: Both invasive FFR and myocardial perfusion imaging with a CZT-based SPECT camera, using Tc-tetrofosmin as tracer, were performed in 100 patients with stable angina and intermediate grade stenosis on invasive coronary angiography. A cut-off value of <0.75 was used to define abnormal FFR. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 64 ± 11 years, and 64 % were men. SPECT demonstrated ischaemia in 31 % of the patients, and 20 % had FFR <0.75. The concordance between CZT SPECT and FFR was 73 % on a per-patient basis and 79 % on a per-vessel basis. Discordant findings were more often seen in older patients and were mainly (19 %) the result of ischaemic SPECT findings in patients with FFR ≥ 0.75, whereas only 8 % had an abnormal FFR without ischaemia as demonstrated by CZT SPECT. CONCLUSION: Only 20 - 30 % of patients with intermediate coronary stenoses had significant ischaemia as assessed by CZT SPECT or invasive FFR. CZT SPECT showed a modest degree of concordance with FFR, which is comparable with previous results with conventional SPECT. Further investigations are particularly necessary in patients with normal SPECT and abnormal FFR, especially to determine whether these patients should undergo revascularization.
Authors: W Lane Duvall; Joseph M Sweeny; Lori B Croft; Maya H Barghash; Nitin K Kulkarni; Krista A Guma; Milena J Henzlova Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2011-06-03 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Narbeh Melikian; Pieter De Bondt; Pim Tonino; Olivier De Winter; Eric Wyffels; Jozef Bartunek; Guy R Heyndrickx; William F Fearon; Nico H J Pijls; William Wijns; Bernard De Bruyne Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Michael Fiechter; Jelena R Ghadri; Silke M Kuest; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Mathias Wolfrum; Rene N Nkoulou; Robert Goetti; Oliver Gaemperli; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-07-15 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Ryo Nakazato; Balaji K Tamarappoo; Xingping Kang; Arik Wolak; Faith Kite; Sean W Hayes; Louise E J Thomson; John D Friedman; Daniel S Berman; Piotr J Slomka Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2010-10-18 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: D S Berman; R Hachamovitch; H Kiat; I Cohen; J A Cabico; F P Wang; J D Friedman; G Germano; K Van Train; G A Diamond Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1995-09 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Sigmund Silber; Per Albertsson; Francisco F Avilés; Paolo G Camici; Antonio Colombo; Christian Hamm; Erik Jørgensen; Jean Marco; Jan-Erik Nordrehaug; Witold Ruzyllo; Philip Urban; Gregg W Stone; William Wijns Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2005-03-15 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Joris D van Dijk; Jorn A van Dalen; Mohamed Mouden; Jan Paul Ottervanger; Siert Knollema; Cornelis H Slump; Pieter L Jager Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 5.952