Literature DB >> 12636465

Trends in incidence rates of invasive lobular and ductal breast carcinoma.

Christopher I Li1, Benjamin O Anderson, Janet R Daling, Roger E Moe.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Research has suggested that use of combined estrogen and progestin hormone replacement therapy (CHRT) increases breast cancer risk and that CHRT use is more strongly associated with the risk of invasive lobular breast carcinoma than that of invasive ductal carcinoma. Lobular carcinoma is less common than ductal carcinoma but can be more difficult to diagnose because of its subtle elusive infiltrative pattern.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate trends in invasive lobular and ductal carcinoma incidence rates from 1987 through 1999, during which time use of CHRT increased in the United States.
DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiologic study.
SETTING: Nine cancer registries that participate in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program of the National Cancer Institute and that cover Atlanta, Ga; Detroit, Mich; San Francisco-Oakland, Calif; Seattle, Wash; and Connecticut, Hawaii, Iowa, New Mexico, and Utah. POPULATION: Women 30 years of age and older residing in the areas covered by the 9 SEER registries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportional changes in incidence rates of invasive lobular and ductal carcinoma among women with no prior history of breast cancer.
RESULTS: A total of 190 458 women were included in this analysis who were identified through the registries as having invasive breast cancer; 7682 of the 198 140 potentially eligible women (ie, those identified as not having in situ breast cancer) were excluded from this analysis because stage of cancer was unknown. Invasive breast cancer incidence rates adjusted for age and for SEER historic stage increased 1.04-fold (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.004-1.07) from 1987-1999 (206.7/100 000 to 214.1/100 000, age-adjusted). However, incidence rates of tumors classified as lobular increased 1.52-fold (95% CI, 1.42-1.63), and those classified as mixed ductal-lobular increased 1.96-fold (95% CI, 1.80-2.14); rates of these types combined increased 1.65-fold (95% CI, 1.55-1.78) (19.8/100 000 to 33.4/100 000, age-adjusted). In contrast, ductal carcinoma rates remained largely constant (153.8/100 000 to 155.3/100 000, age-adjusted; proportional change, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.99-1.06]). The proportion of breast cancers with a lobular component increased from 9.5% in 1987 to 15.6% in 1999.
CONCLUSIONS: Ductal carcinoma incidence rates remained essentially constant from 1987-1999 while lobular carcinoma rates increased steadily. This increase presents a clinical challenge given that lobular carcinoma is more difficult to detect than ductal carcinoma by both physical examination and mammography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12636465     DOI: 10.1001/jama.289.11.1421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  126 in total

1.  Mixed Invasive Ductal and Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast: Prognosis and the Importance of Histologic Grade.

Authors:  Otto Metzger-Filho; Arlindo R Ferreira; Rinath Jeselsohn; William T Barry; Deborah A Dillon; Jane E Brock; Ines Vaz-Luis; Melissa E Hughes; Eric P Winer; Nancy U Lin
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-12-05

2.  Different gene expression patterns in invasive lobular and ductal carcinomas of the breast.

Authors:  Hongjuan Zhao; Anita Langerød; Youngran Ji; Kent W Nowels; Jahn M Nesland; Rob Tibshirani; Ida K Bukholm; Rolf Kåresen; David Botstein; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Stefanie S Jeffrey
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 3.  The molecular pathology of breast cancer progression.

Authors:  Alessandro Bombonati; Dennis C Sgroi
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 4.  Current breast cancer risks of hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Nirav R Shah; Tanping Wong
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.889

Review 5.  How to Choose a Mouse Model of Breast Cancer, a Genomic Perspective.

Authors:  Matthew R Swiatnicki; Eran R Andrechek
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.673

6.  Is transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue from patients with advanced-stage breast cancer safe? A pilot study.

Authors:  V Luyckx; J F Durant; A Camboni; S Gilliaux; C A Amorim; A Van Langendonckt; L M Irenge; J L Gala; J Donnez; M M Dolmans
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Efficacy of Single-Agent Chemotherapy for Patients with Advanced Invasive Lobular Carcinoma: A Pooled Analysis from Three Clinical Trials.

Authors:  José Pérez-Garcia; Javier Cortés; Otto Metzger Filho
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-12-21

8.  Imaging features of invasive lobular carcinoma: comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma.

Authors:  Sung Hun Kim; Eun Suk Cha; Chang Suk Park; Bong Joo Kang; In Yong Whang; A Won Lee; Byung Joo Song; Jeongmi Park
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 2.374

9.  Invasive ductal carcinoma with lobular features: a comparison study to invasive ductal and invasive lobular carcinomas of the breast.

Authors:  David P Arps; Patrick Healy; Lili Zhao; Celina G Kleer; Judy C Pang
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Adequacy of diagnostic tests and surgical management of symptomatic invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  D J Hadjiminas; K E Zacharioudakis; M K Tasoulis; J C C Hu; S Lanitis; R Bright-Thomas; N G Dimopoulos; G Hornzee; D A Cunningham; S J Cleator; R Al Mufti
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.