Literature DB >> 25195986

Considerations for observational research using large data sets in radiation oncology.

Reshma Jagsi1, Justin E Bekelman2, Aileen Chen3, Ronald C Chen4, Karen Hoffman5, Ya-Chen Tina Shih6, Benjamin D Smith7, James B Yu8.   

Abstract

The radiation oncology community has witnessed growing interest in observational research conducted using large-scale data sources such as registries and claims-based data sets. With the growing emphasis on observational analyses in health care, the radiation oncology community must possess a sophisticated understanding of the methodological considerations of such studies in order to evaluate evidence appropriately to guide practice and policy. Because observational research has unique features that distinguish it from clinical trials and other forms of traditional radiation oncology research, the International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics assembled a panel of experts in health services research to provide a concise and well-referenced review, intended to be informative for the lay reader, as well as for scholars who wish to embark on such research without prior experience. This review begins by discussing the types of research questions relevant to radiation oncology that large-scale databases may help illuminate. It then describes major potential data sources for such endeavors, including information regarding access and insights regarding the strengths and limitations of each. Finally, it provides guidance regarding the analytical challenges that observational studies must confront, along with discussion of the techniques that have been developed to help minimize the impact of certain common analytical issues in observational analysis. Features characterizing a well-designed observational study include clearly defined research questions, careful selection of an appropriate data source, consultation with investigators with relevant methodological expertise, inclusion of sensitivity analyses, caution not to overinterpret small but significant differences, and recognition of limitations when trying to evaluate causality. This review concludes that carefully designed and executed studies using observational data that possess these qualities hold substantial promise for advancing our understanding of many unanswered questions of importance to the field of radiation oncology.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25195986      PMCID: PMC4159773          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  106 in total

1.  Proportional means regression for censored medical costs.

Authors:  D Y Lin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Comparative effectiveness research in radiation oncology: stereotactic radiosurgery, hypofractionation, and brachytherapy.

Authors:  Sanjay Aneja; James B Yu
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.934

3.  Oncology comparative effectiveness research: a multistakeholder perspective on principles for conduct and reporting.

Authors:  Scott D Ramsey; Sean D Sullivan; Shelby D Reed; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Ken Schaecher; Rahul Dhanda; Debra Patt; Kelly Pendergrass; Mark Walker; Jennifer Malin; Lee Schwartzberg; Kurt Neumann; Elaine Yu; Arliene Ravelo; Art Small
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-05-06

4.  Trends in the utilization of brachytherapy in cervical cancer in the United States. In regard to Han et al.

Authors:  Grace L Smith; Patricia J Eifel
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Comparative effectiveness of 5 treatment strategies for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly.

Authors:  Shervin M Shirvani; Jing Jiang; Joe Y Chang; James W Welsh; Daniel R Gomez; Stephen Swisher; Thomas A Buchholz; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Developing a national radiation oncology registry: From acorns to oaks.

Authors:  Jatinder R Palta; Jason A Efstathiou; Justin E Bekelman; Sasa Mutic; Carl R Bogardus; Todd R McNutt; Peter E Gabriel; Colleen A Lawton; Anthony L Zietman; Christopher M Rose
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-07-14

7.  Trends and variation in use of breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy in the United States.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Jing Jiang; Adeyiza O Momoh; Amy Alderman; Sharon H Giordano; Thomas A Buchholz; Steven J Kronowitz; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Single- vs multiple-fraction radiotherapy for bone metastases from prostate cancer.

Authors:  Justin E Bekelman; Andrew J Epstein; Ezekiel J Emanuel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database analysis of microcystic adnexal carcinoma (sclerosing sweat duct carcinoma) of the skin.

Authors:  James B Yu; Rachel C Blitzblau; Sonya C Patel; Roy H Decker; Lynn D Wilson
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.339

10.  Identifying cancer relapse using SEER-Medicare data.

Authors:  Craig C Earle; Ann B Nattinger; Arnold L Potosky; Kathleen Lang; Rajiv Mallick; Mark Berger; Joan L Warren
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  28 in total

1.  Comparison of Population-Based Observational Studies With Randomized Trials in Oncology.

Authors:  Payal D Soni; Holly E Hartman; Robert T Dess; Ahmed Abugharib; Steven G Allen; Felix Y Feng; Anthony L Zietman; Reshma Jagsi; Matthew J Schipper; Daniel E Spratt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Survival advantage of chemoradiotherapy in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: Propensity score matched analysis with multiple subgroups.

Authors:  Sibo Tian; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Teng Fei; Robert H Press; Mustafa Abugideiri; Nabil F Saba; Taofeek K Owonikoko; Amy Y Chen; Jonathan J Beitler; Walter J Curran; Theresa W Gillespie; Kristin A Higgins
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 3.  Strengths and limitations of large databases in lung cancer radiation oncology research.

Authors:  Vikram Jairam; Henry S Park
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2019-09

4.  Promoting the Appropriate Use of Advanced Radiation Technologies in Oncology: Summary of a National Cancer Policy Forum Workshop.

Authors:  Grace L Smith; Patricia A Ganz; Justin E Bekelman; Steven J Chmura; James J Dignam; Jason A Efstathiou; Reshma Jagsi; Peter A Johnstone; Michael L Steinberg; Stephen B Williams; James B Yu; Anthony L Zietman; Ralph R Weichselbaum; Ya-Chen Tina Shih
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Primary management of atypical meningioma: treatment patterns and survival outcomes by patient age.

Authors:  Ernest Barthélemy; Joshua Loewenstern; Neeraja Konuthula; Margaret Pain; Jordan Hall; Satish Govindaraj; Joshua Bederson; Raj K Shrivastava
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Regional Nodal Irradiation After Breast Conserving Surgery for Early HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: Results of a Subanalysis From the ALTTO Trial.

Authors:  Isabelle Gingras; Eileen Holmes; Evandro De Azambuja; David H A Nguyen; Miguel Izquierdo; Jo Anne Zujewski; Moshe Inbar; Bjorn Naume; Gianluca Tomasello; Julie R Gralow; Antonio C Wolff; Lyndsay Harris; Michael Gnant; Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia; Martine J Piccart; Hatem A Azim
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  The opportunities and shortcomings of using big data and national databases for sarcoma research.

Authors:  Heather G Lyu; Adil H Haider; Adam B Landman; Chandrajit P Raut
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Survival outcomes by high-risk human papillomavirus status in nonoropharyngeal head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: A propensity-scored analysis of the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Sibo Tian; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Jaymin Jhaveri; Richard J Cassidy; Matthew J Ferris; Robert H Press; Neil T Pfister; Mihir R Patel; Nabil F Saba; Mark W McDonald; Kristin A Higgins; David S Yu; Walter J Curran; Theresa W Gillespie; Jonathan J Beitler
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Disparities in receipt of modern concurrent chemoradiotherapy in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Ryan Rhome; Rebecca Fisher; Adília Hormigo; Rahul R Parikh
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 10.  Use of Claims Data for Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Research.

Authors:  Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Lei Liu
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 5.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.