Literature DB >> 24297652

Impact of surgeon and hospital volume on mortality, length of stay, and cost of pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Laura M Enomoto1, Niraj J Gusani, Peter W Dillon, Christopher S Hollenbeak.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Improved mortality rates following pancreaticoduodenectomy by high-volume surgeons and hospitals have been well documented, but less is known about the impact of such volumes on length of stay and cost. This study uses data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to examine the effect of surgeon and hospital volume on mortality, length of stay, and cost following pancreaticoduodenectomy while controlling for patient-specific factors.
METHODS: Data included 3,137 pancreaticoduodenectomies from the NIS performed between 2004 and 2008. Using logistic regression, the relationship between surgeon volume, hospital volume, and postoperative mortality, length of stay, and cost was estimated while accounting for patient factors.
RESULTS: After controlling for patient characteristics, patients of high-volume surgeons at high-volume hospitals had a significantly lower risk of mortality compared to low-volume surgeons at low-volume hospitals (OR 0.32, p < 0.001). Patients of high-volume surgeons at high-volume hospitals also had a five day shorter length of stay (p < 0.001), as well as significantly lower costs (US$12,275, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study, which simultaneously accounted for surgeon volume, hospital volume, and potential confounding patient characteristics, suggest that both surgeon and hospital volume have a significant effect on outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy, affecting not only mortality rates but also lengths of stay and costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24297652     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-013-2422-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  21 in total

1.  Improving the safety of health care: the leapfrog initiative.

Authors:  A Milstein; R S Galvin; S F Delbanco; P Salber; C R Buck
Journal:  Eff Clin Pract       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec

2.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery.

Authors:  Jonathan F Finks; Nicholas H Osborne; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Hospital volume influences outcome in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for cancer.

Authors:  R E Glasgow; S J Mulvihill
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1996-11

5.  Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.

Authors:  Hude Quan; Vijaya Sundararajan; Patricia Halfon; Andrew Fong; Bernard Burnand; Jean-Christophe Luthi; L Duncan Saunders; Cynthia A Beck; Thomas E Feasby; William A Ghali
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Hospital volume, surgeon volume, and patient costs for cancer surgery.

Authors:  Vivian Ho; Thomas Aloia
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery.

Authors:  C B Begg; L D Cramer; W J Hoskins; M F Brennan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-25       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Has recognition of the relationship between mortality rates and hospital volume for major cancer surgery in California made a difference?: A follow-up analysis of another decade.

Authors:  Warren J Gasper; David V Glidden; Chengshi Jin; Lawrence W Way; Marco G Patti
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Patient and hospital characteristics on the variance of perioperative outcomes for pancreatic resection in the United States: a plea for outcome-based and not volume-based referral guidelines.

Authors:  Swee H Teh; Brian S Diggs; Clifford W Deveney; Brett C Sheppard
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2009-08

10.  Surgeon volume impacts hospital mortality for pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Robert W Eppsteiner; Nicholas G Csikesz; James T McPhee; Jennifer F Tseng; Shimul A Shah
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: role in 2014 and beyond.

Authors:  Erin H Baker; Samuel W Ross; Ramanathan Seshadri; Ryan Z Swan; David A Iannitti; Dionisios Vrochides; John B Martinie
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-08

2.  The Public may be Right: Should We Reconsider Minimum Surgeon Volumes?

Authors:  Quan-Yang Duh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Impact of surgical experience on management and outcome of pancreatic surgery performed in high- and low-volume centers.

Authors:  Marco Stella; Massimiliano Bissolati; Daniele Gentile; Alessandro Arriciati
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-02-18

4.  High performing whipple patients: factors associated with short length of stay after open pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Grace C Lee; Zhi Ven Fong; Cristina R Ferrone; Sarah P Thayer; Andrew L Warshaw; Keith D Lillemoe; Carlos Fernández-del Castillo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Robotic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy inpatient analysis: does the end justify the means?

Authors:  Jan P Kamiński; Kenneth W Bueltmann; Marek Rudnicki
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Overuse of surgery in patients with pancreatic cancer. A nationwide analysis in Italy.

Authors:  Gianpaolo Balzano; Giovanni Capretti; Giuditta Callea; Elena Cantù; Flavia Carle; Raffaele Pezzilli
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Hospital experience predicts outcomes after high-risk geriatric surgery.

Authors:  Jill Q Dworsky; Christopher P Childers; Jeffrey Gornbein; Melinda Maggard-Gibbons; Marcia M Russell
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 8.  Quality Versus Costs Related to Gastrointestinal Surgery: Disentangling the Value Proposition.

Authors:  Rohan Shah; Adrian Diaz; Marzia Tripepi; Fabio Bagante; Diamantis I Tsilimigras; Nikolaos Machairas; Fragiska Sigala; Dimitrios Moris; Savio George Barreto; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  Recent Advances in Pancreatic Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Laura Maggino; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-12

10.  Operative Trends for Pancreatic Diseases in the USA: Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 1998-2011.

Authors:  Anwar Dudekula; Satish Munigala; Amer H Zureikat; Dhiraj Yadav
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.