Literature DB >> 21631325

Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery.

Jonathan F Finks1, Nicholas H Osborne, John D Birkmeyer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There were numerous efforts in the United States during the previous decade to concentrate selected surgical procedures in high-volume hospitals. It remains unknown whether referral patterns for high-risk surgery have changed as a result and how operative mortality has been affected.
METHODS: We used national Medicare data to study patients undergoing one of eight different cancer and cardiovascular operations from 1999 through 2008. For each procedure, we examined trends in hospital volume and market concentration, defined as the proportion of Medicare patients undergoing surgery in the top decile of hospitals by volume per year. We used regression-based techniques to assess the effects of volume and market concentration on mortality over time, adjusting for case mix.
RESULTS: Median hospital volumes of four cancer resections (lung, esophagus, pancreas, and bladder) and of repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rose substantially. Depending on the procedure, higher hospital volumes were attributable to an increasing number of cases nationwide, an increasing market concentration, or both. Hospital volumes rose slightly for aortic-valve replacement but fell for coronary-artery bypass grafting and carotid endarterectomy. Operative mortality declined for all eight procedures, ranging from a relative decline of 8% for carotid endarterectomy (1.3% mortality in 1999 and 1.2% in 2008) to 36% for AAA repair (4.4% in 1999 and 2.8% in 2008). Higher hospital volumes explained a large portion of the decline in mortality for pancreatectomy (67% of the decline), cystectomy (37%), and esophagectomy (32%), but not for the other procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: Operative mortality with high-risk surgery fell substantially during the previous decade. Although increased market concentration and hospital volume have contributed to declining mortality with some high-risk cancer operations, declines in mortality with other procedures are largely attributable to other factors. (Funded by the National Institute on Aging.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21631325      PMCID: PMC3150488          DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa1010705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  28 in total

1.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Regional availability of high-volume hospitals for major surgery.

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; Samuel R G Finlayson; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Explaining racial and ethnic disparities in health care.

Authors:  James B Kirby; Gregg Taliaferro; Samuel H Zuvekas
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.

Authors:  A Elixhauser; C Steiner; D R Harris; R M Coffey
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  A decade of change--risk profiles and outcomes for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting procedures, 1990-1999: a report from the STS National Database Committee and the Duke Clinical Research Institute. Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

Authors:  T Bruce Ferguson; Bradley G Hammill; Eric D Peterson; Elizabeth R DeLong; Frederick L Grover
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  The regionalization of radical cystectomy to specific medical centers.

Authors:  Brent K Hollenbeck; David A Taub; David C Miller; Rodney L Dunn; James E Montie; John T Wei
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  What would be the effect of referral to high-volume hospitals in a largely rural state?

Authors:  Marcia M Ward; Mirou Jaana; Douglas S Wakefield; Robert L Ohsfeldt; John E Schneider; Thomas Miller; Yang Lei
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Patient preferences for location of care: implications for regionalization.

Authors:  S R Finlayson; J D Birkmeyer; A N Tosteson; R F Nease
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Procedural volume as a marker of quality for CABG surgery.

Authors:  Eric D Peterson; Laura P Coombs; Elizabeth R DeLong; Constance K Haan; T Bruce Ferguson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group.

Authors:  G T O'Connor; S K Plume; E M Olmstead; J R Morton; C T Maloney; W C Nugent; F Hernandez; R Clough; B J Leavitt; L H Coffin; C A Marrin; D Wennberg; J D Birkmeyer; D C Charlesworth; D J Malenka; H B Quinton; J F Kasper
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-03-20       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  327 in total

1.  Targeted screening of individuals at high risk for pancreatic cancer: results of a simulation model.

Authors:  Pari V Pandharipande; Curtis Heberle; Emily C Dowling; Chung Yin Kong; Angela Tramontano; Katherine E Perzan; William Brugge; Chin Hur
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Current management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  G Sancho; P Maroto; J Palou
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  Opportunities for cost reduction of medical care: part 3.

Authors:  Monte Malach; William J Baumol
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2012-08

4.  Risk of morbidity and mortality following hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery.

Authors:  Peter J Kneuertz; Henry A Pitt; Karl Y Bilimoria; Jill P Smiley; Mark E Cohen; Clifford Y Ko; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Polyester Preserves the Highest Breaking Point After Prolonged Incubation in Pancreatic Juice.

Authors:  Stefano Andrianello; Giovanni Marchegiani; Biagio Anselmi; Erica Secchettin; Fabrizio Boriero; Giuseppe Malleo; Roberto Salvia; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Evolution of standardized clinical pathways: refining multidisciplinary care and process to improve outcomes of the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Sheraz R Markar; Henner Schmidt; Sonia Kunz; Artur Bodnar; Michal Hubka; Donald E Low
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Regionalization and outcomes of hepato-pancreato-biliary cancer surgery in USA.

Authors:  Paul D Colavita; Victor B Tsirline; Igor Belyansky; Ryan Z Swan; Amanda L Walters; Amy E Lincourt; David A Iannitti; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Association of hospital volume with conditional 90-day mortality after cystectomy: an analysis of the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Matthew E Nielsen; Katherine Mallin; Mark A Weaver; Bryan Palis; Andrew Stewart; David P Winchester; Matthew I Milowsky
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Poor outcomes for children on the wait list at low-volume kidney transplant centers in the United States.

Authors:  Abbas Rana; Eileen D Brewer; Brandi B Scully; Michael L Kueht; Matt Goss; Karim J Halazun; Hao Liu; N Thao N Galvan; Ronald T Cotton; Christine A O'Mahony
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 10.  Influence of Hospital Volume Effects and Minimum Caseload Requirements on Quality of Care in Pancreatic Surgery in Germany.

Authors:  Christian Krautz; Axel Denz; Georg F Weber; Robert Grützmann
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-03-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.