Literature DB >> 8993200

Hospital volume influences outcome in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for cancer.

R E Glasgow1, S J Mulvihill.   

Abstract

Surgical resection is the only possibly curative treatment of malignant pancreatic neoplasms, but major pancreatic resection for cancer is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to determine the relation between hospital volume and outcome in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for malignancy in California. Data were obtained from reports submitted to the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development by all California hospitals from 1990 through 1994. Patient abstracts were analyzed for each of 1,705 patients who underwent major pancreatic resection for malignancy. Of the 298 reporting hospitals, 88% treated fewer than 2 patients per year; these low-volume centers treated the majority of patients. High-volume providers had significantly decreased operative mortality, complication-associated mortality, patient resource use, and total charges and were more likely than low-volume centers to discharge patients to home. These differences were not accounted for by patient mix. This study supports the concept of regionalizing high risk procedures in general surgery, such as major pancreatic resection for cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8993200      PMCID: PMC1303846     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  24 in total

1.  The effects of regionalization on cost and outcome for one general high-risk surgical procedure.

Authors:  T A Gordon; G P Burleyson; J M Tielsch; J L Cameron
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Survival after pancreatoduodenectomy. 118 consecutive resections without an operative mortality.

Authors:  M Trede; G Schwall; H D Saeger
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  The importance of severity of illness in assessing hospital mortality.

Authors:  J Green; N Wintfeld; P Sharkey; L J Passman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-01-12       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Cancer statistics, 1994.

Authors:  C C Boring; T S Squires; T Tong; S Montgomery
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Hospital volume and patient outcomes. The case of hip fracture patients.

Authors:  R G Hughes; D W Garnick; H S Luft; S J McPhee; S S Hunt
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  One hundred and forty-five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality.

Authors:  J L Cameron; H A Pitt; C J Yeo; K D Lillemoe; H S Kaufman; J Coleman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  The relation between experience and outcome in heart transplantation.

Authors:  G L Laffel; A I Barnett; S Finkelstein; M P Kaye
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-10-22       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Improved hospital morbidity, mortality, and survival after the Whipple procedure.

Authors:  D W Crist; J V Sitzmann; J L Cameron
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Prognostic indicators for survival after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  R J Geer; M F Brennan
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  An analysis of the reduced morbidity and mortality rates after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  C A Pellegrini; C F Heck; S Raper; L W Way
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1989-07
View more
  50 in total

1.  Prostate cancer from a patient's perspective.

Authors:  D Grundy
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-06-29       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Understanding obesity.

Authors:  J D Douketis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-06-29       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  The more the better?

Authors:  M Simunovic; T To; B Langer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-06-29       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Understanding obesity.

Authors:  T M Stein
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-06-29       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Relation between hospital surgical volume and outcome for pancreatic resection for neoplasm in a publicly funded health care system.

Authors:  M Simunovic; T To; M Theriault; B Langer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-03-09       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Someone else is measuring our outcomes.

Authors:  L W Traverso
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The volume-outcome relationship in cancer surgery: a hard sell.

Authors:  Ingemar Ihse
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Hospital volume, length of stay, and readmission rates in high-risk surgery.

Authors:  Philip P Goodney; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Emily V A Finlayson; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Regionalization and outcomes of hepato-pancreato-biliary cancer surgery in USA.

Authors:  Paul D Colavita; Victor B Tsirline; Igor Belyansky; Ryan Z Swan; Amanda L Walters; Amy E Lincourt; David A Iannitti; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Surgery versus radiochemotherapy for resectable locally invasive pancreatic cancer: final results of a randomized multi-institutional trial.

Authors:  Ryuichiro Doi; Masayuki Imamura; Ryo Hosotani; Toshihide Imaizumi; Takashi Hatori; Ken Takasaki; Akihiro Funakoshi; Hideyuki Wakasugi; Takehide Asano; Shoichi Hishinuma; Yoshiro Ogata; Makoto Sunamura; Koji Yamaguchi; Masao Tanaka; Sonshin Takao; Takashi Aikou; Koichi Hirata; Hiroyuki Maguchi; Koichi Aiura; Tatsuya Aoki; Akira Kakita; Makoto Sasaki; Masahiko Ozaki; Satoru Matsusue; Shunichi Higashide; Hideki Noda; Seiyo Ikeda; Shunzo Maetani; Shigeaki Yoshida
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.