Literature DB >> 24295937

Dense breast legislation in the United States: state of the states.

Soudabeh Fazeli Dehkordy1, Ruth C Carlos.   

Abstract

Limitations of screening mammography in patients with dense breasts combined with the significant increased risk for breast cancer have made the issue of dense breasts a matter of great concern in recent years, leading to advocacy for policy change and legislation. Dense breast notification legislation requires direct patient notification of mammographic results indicating the presence of dense breast tissue. The aim of this study was to summarize the state of dense breast notification legislation across the country. The general intent of dense breast notification legislation is to increase awareness of dense breasts and encourage patients to discuss the clinical issues with their physicians. It was first enacted in Connecticut in 2009, and since then, 27 other states have passed, rejected, or considered dense breast notification legislation. At the federal level, a bill was introduced in October 2011, but it was not enacted. There are significant differences in the language of the laws from state to state that complicate implementation. Furthermore, legislated recommendations for possible additional testing are often unaccompanied by legal provisions for insurance coverage, which potentially results in unequal access.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dense breast; legislation; mammography; patient communication; screening

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24295937     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  17 in total

Review 1.  Screening ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography in women with mammographically dense breasts.

Authors:  John R Scheel; Janie M Lee; Brian L Sprague; Christoph I Lee; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Changes in breast cancer risk distribution among Vermont women using screening mammography.

Authors:  Kenyon C Bolton; John L Mace; Pamela M Vacek; Sally D Herschorn; Ted A James; Jeffrey A Tice; Karla Kerlikowske; Berta M Geller; Donald L Weaver; Brian L Sprague
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  Breast Density Knowledge and Awareness: A Review of Literature.

Authors:  Marimer Santiago-Rivas; Shayna Benjamin; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2016-02-23

4.  Performance of Screening Ultrasonography as an Adjunct to Screening Mammography in Women Across the Spectrum of Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Janie M Lee; Robert F Arao; Brian L Sprague; Karla Kerlikowske; Constance D Lehman; Robert A Smith; Louise M Henderson; Garth H Rauscher; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  Advanced Breast Imaging Availability by Screening Facility Characteristics.

Authors:  Christoph I Lee; Andy Bogart; Rebecca A Hubbard; Eniola T Obadina; Deirdre A Hill; Jennifer S Haas; Anna N A Tosteson; Jennifer A Alford-Teaster; Brian L Sprague; Wendy B DeMartini; Constance D Lehman; Tracy L Onega
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Dense breast tissue notification: impact on women's perceived risk, anxiety, and intentions for future breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Vivian M Yeh; Julie B Schnur; Laurie Margolies; Guy H Montgomery
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Impact of the California breast density law on primary care physicians.

Authors:  Kathleen A Khong; Jonathan Hargreaves; Shadi Aminololama-Shakeri; Karen K Lindfors
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts.

Authors:  Brian L Sprague; Natasha K Stout; Clyde Schechter; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Mucahit Cevik; Oguzhan Alagoz; Christoph I Lee; Jeroen J van den Broek; Diana L Miglioretti; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Harry J de Koning; Karla Kerlikowske; Constance D Lehman; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Novel data sources for women's health research: mapping breast screening online information seeking through Google trends.

Authors:  Soudabeh Fazeli Dehkordy; Ruth C Carlos; Kelli S Hall; Vanessa K Dalton
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Variation in Mammographic Breast Density Assessments Among Radiologists in Clinical Practice: A Multicenter Observational Study.

Authors:  Brian L Sprague; Emily F Conant; Tracy Onega; Michael P Garcia; Elisabeth F Beaber; Sally D Herschorn; Constance D Lehman; Anna N A Tosteson; Ronilda Lacson; Mitchell D Schnall; Despina Kontos; Jennifer S Haas; Donald L Weaver; William E Barlow
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.