Literature DB >> 24465078

APPROXIMATING POWER OF THE UNCONDITIONAL TEST FOR CORRELATED BINARY PAIRS.

Grace R Selicato1, Keith E Muller2.   

Abstract

We provide a simple and good approximation of power of the unconditional test for two correlated binary variables. Suissa and Shuster (1991) described the exact unconditional test. The most commonly used statistical test in this setting, McNemar's test, is exact conditional on the sum of the discordant pairs. Although asymptotically the conditional and unconditional versions coincide, a long-standing debate surrounds the choice between them. Several power approximations have been studied for both methods (Miettinen, 1968; Bennett and Underwood, 1970; Connett, Smith, and McHugh, 1987; Connor, 1987; Suissa and Shuster, 1991; Lachenbruch, 1992; Lachin, 1992). For the unconditional approach most existing power approximations use the Gaussian distribution, while the accurate ("exact") method is computationally burdensome. A new approximation uses the F statistic corresponding to a paired-data T test computed from the difference scores of the binary outcomes. Enumeration of all possible 2 × 2 tables for small sample sizes allowed evaluation of both test size and power. The new approximation compares favorably to others due to the combination of ease of use and accuracy.

Keywords:  2 × 2 table; McNemar’s Test

Year:  1998        PMID: 24465078      PMCID: PMC3898531          DOI: 10.1080/03610919808813494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Commun Stat Simul Comput        ISSN: 0361-0918            Impact factor:   1.118


  6 in total

1.  On the sample size for studies based upon McNemar's test.

Authors:  P A Lachenbruch
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Power and sample size evaluation for the McNemar test with application to matched case-control studies.

Authors:  J M Lachin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1992-06-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  The 2 x 2 matched-pairs trial: exact unconditional design and analysis.

Authors:  S Suissa; J J Shuster
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  The matched pairs design in the case of all-or-none responses.

Authors:  O S Miettinen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1968-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Sample size and power for pair-matched case-control studies.

Authors:  J E Connett; J A Smith; R B McHugh
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1987 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Sample size for testing differences in proportions for the paired-sample design.

Authors:  R J Connor
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.571

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Exact calculations of average power for the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure.

Authors:  Deborah H Glueck; Jan Mandel; Anis Karimpour-Fard; Lawrence Hunter; Keith E Muller
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 0.968

2.  A GEE Approach to Determine Sample Size for Pre- and Post-Intervention Experiments with Dropout.

Authors:  Song Zhang; Jing Cao; Chul Ahn
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.681

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.