Literature DB >> 24292990

Responses to FTO genetic test feedback for obesity in a sample of overweight adults: a qualitative analysis.

S F Meisel1, J Wardle.   

Abstract

Current evidence indicates that genetic testing for obesity risk has limited affective or behavioral impact, but few studies have explored the effects among individuals who self-identify as having weight problems. Here, we report findings from in-depth telephone interviews with seven overweight or obese volunteers who were genotyped for one weight-related gene (FTO), which may offer interesting insights into motivations to seek out genetic testing and immediate reactions to it. All participants had a BMI > 25. The gene test identified one participant as homozygous for the 'higher-risk' variant (AA), three heterozygous (AT), and three homozygous for the 'lower-risk' variant (TT) of FTO. All participants said they took part to find an explanation for their personal struggle with weight control. Those with one or two higher-risk variants experienced relief and saw the result as confirming their private assumption that they were susceptible to weight gain for reasons perceived as 'external' to them. However, at the same time, they described themselves as more motivated to overcome their genetic predisposition. Those with lower-risk variants reported brief disappointment, but then focused on alternative explanations, reinforcing the multifactorial nature of obesity. Despite objectively low 'information value,' all individuals derived some 'personal' benefit from FTO genetic test feedback. However, improving education about the multifactorial nature of complex conditions is important to decrease polarized thinking and associated genetic determinism and stigma to derive the greatest benefits of novel genetic technologies for individuals and their health.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24292990      PMCID: PMC3896618          DOI: 10.1007/s12263-013-0374-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Nutr        ISSN: 1555-8932            Impact factor:   5.523


  26 in total

1.  Does genetic testing for obesity influence confidence in the ability to lose weight? A pilot investigation.

Authors:  J Harvey-Berino; E C Gold; D S West; A R Shuldiner; J Walston; R D Starling; A Nolan; K Silver; E T Poehlman
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2001-11

2.  Incorporating genetic susceptibility feedback into a smoking cessation program for African-American smokers with low income.

Authors:  Colleen M McBride; Gerold Bepler; Isaac M Lipkus; Pauline Lyna; Greg Samsa; Jennifer Albright; Santanu Datta; Barbara K Rimer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Psychological responses to genetic testing for weight gain: a vignette study.

Authors:  Susanne F Meisel; Catherine Walker; Jane Wardle
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 5.002

Review 4.  The future of direct-to-consumer clinical genetic tests.

Authors:  Felix W Frueh; Henry T Greely; Robert C Green; Stuart Hogarth; Sue Siegel
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Impact of direct-to-consumer genomic testing at long term follow-up.

Authors:  Cinnamon S Bloss; Nathan E Wineinger; Burcu F Darst; Nicholas J Schork; Eric J Topol
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  Associations between anticipated reactions to genetic test results and interest in genetic testing: will self-selection reduce the potential for harm?

Authors:  Saskia C Sanderson; Jane Wardle
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2008-03

7.  A consultation with genetic information about obesity decreases self-blame about eating and leads to realistic weight loss goals in obese individuals.

Authors:  Matthias Conradt; Jan-Michael Dierk; Pia Schlumberger; Christina Albohn; Elisabeth Rauh; Anke Hinney; Johannes Hebebrand; Winfried Rief
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  A common variant in the FTO gene is associated with body mass index and predisposes to childhood and adult obesity.

Authors:  Timothy M Frayling; Nicholas J Timpson; Michael N Weedon; Eleftheria Zeggini; Rachel M Freathy; Cecilia M Lindgren; John R B Perry; Katherine S Elliott; Hana Lango; Nigel W Rayner; Beverley Shields; Lorna W Harries; Jeffrey C Barrett; Sian Ellard; Christopher J Groves; Bridget Knight; Ann-Marie Patch; Andrew R Ness; Shah Ebrahim; Debbie A Lawlor; Susan M Ring; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin; Ulla Sovio; Amanda J Bennett; David Melzer; Luigi Ferrucci; Ruth J F Loos; Inês Barroso; Nicholas J Wareham; Fredrik Karpe; Katharine R Owen; Lon R Cardon; Mark Walker; Graham A Hitman; Colin N A Palmer; Alex S F Doney; Andrew D Morris; George Davey Smith; Andrew T Hattersley; Mark I McCarthy
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  'Battling my biology': psychological effects of genetic testing for risk of weight gain.

Authors:  S F Meisel; J Wardle
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Genome-wide association scan shows genetic variants in the FTO gene are associated with obesity-related traits.

Authors:  Angelo Scuteri; Serena Sanna; Wei-Min Chen; Manuela Uda; Giuseppe Albai; James Strait; Samer Najjar; Ramaiah Nagaraja; Marco Orrú; Gianluca Usala; Mariano Dei; Sandra Lai; Andrea Maschio; Fabio Busonero; Antonella Mulas; Georg B Ehret; Ashley A Fink; Alan B Weder; Richard S Cooper; Pilar Galan; Aravinda Chakravarti; David Schlessinger; Antonio Cao; Edward Lakatta; Gonçalo R Abecasis
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  6 in total

1.  A randomized trial Examining The Impact Of Communicating Genetic And Lifestyle Risks For Obesity.

Authors:  Catharine Wang; Erynn S Gordon; Tricia Norkunas; Lisa Wawak; Ching-Ti Liu; Michael Winter; Rachel S Kasper; Michael F Christman; Robert C Green; Deborah J Bowen
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.002

2.  Is obesity in the brain? Parent perceptions of brain influences on obesity.

Authors:  Jennifer R Sadler; Susan Persky; Cihang Gu; Anahys H Aghababian; Susan Carnell
Journal:  Pediatr Obes       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 3.910

3.  Genetic susceptibility testing and readiness to control weight: Results from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Susanne F Meisel; Rebecca J Beeken; Cornelia H M van Jaarsveld; Jane Wardle
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 5.002

Review 4.  Applied Interventions in the Prevention and Treatment of Obesity Through the Research of Professor Jane Wardle.

Authors:  Helen Croker; Rebecca J Beeken
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2017-03

5.  Genetic Predisposition Impacts Clinical Changes in a Lifestyle Coaching Program.

Authors:  Niha Zubair; Matthew P Conomos; Leroy Hood; Gilbert S Omenn; Nathan D Price; Bonnie J Spring; Andrew T Magis; Jennifer C Lovejoy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Explaining, not just predicting, drives interest in personal genomics.

Authors:  Susanne F Meisel; Deanna Alexis Carere; Jane Wardle; Sarah S Kalia; Tanya A Moreno; Joanna L Mountain; J Scott Roberts; Robert C Green
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 11.117

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.