Literature DB >> 23832708

'Battling my biology': psychological effects of genetic testing for risk of weight gain.

S F Meisel1, J Wardle.   

Abstract

The availability of genetic tests for multifactorial conditions such as obesity raises concerns that higher-risk results could lead to fatalistic reactions or lower-risk results to complacency. No study has investigated the effects of genetic test feedback for the risk of obesity in non-clinical samples. The present study explored psychological and behavioral reactions to genetic test feedback for a weight related gene (FTO) in a volunteer sample (n = 18) using semi-structured interviews. Respondents perceived the gene test result as scientifically objective; removing some of the emotion attached to the issue of weight control. Those who were struggling with weight control reported relief of self-blame. There was no evidence for either complacency or fatalism; all respondents emphasized the importance of lifestyle choices in long-term weight management, although they recognized the role of both genes and environment. Regardless of the test result, respondents evaluated the testing positively and found it motivating and informative. Genetic test feedback for risk of weight gain may offer psychological benefits beyond its objectively limited clinical utility. As the role of genetic counselors is likely to expand, awareness of reasons for genetic testing for common, complex conditions and reactions to the test result is important.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23832708     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-013-9628-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  28 in total

1.  Does genetic testing for obesity influence confidence in the ability to lose weight? A pilot investigation.

Authors:  J Harvey-Berino; E C Gold; D S West; A R Shuldiner; J Walston; R D Starling; A Nolan; K Silver; E T Poehlman
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2001-11

Review 2.  Obesity--is it a genetic disorder?

Authors:  R J F Loos; C Bouchard
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 3.  The stigma of obesity: a review and update.

Authors:  Rebecca M Puhl; Chelsea A Heuer
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 5.002

4.  Personal responsibility and obesity: a constructive approach to a controversial issue.

Authors:  Kelly D Brownell; Rogan Kersh; David S Ludwig; Robert C Post; Rebecca M Puhl; Marlene B Schwartz; Walter C Willett
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  What's at stake? Genetic information from the perspective of people with epilepsy and their family members.

Authors:  Sara Shostak; Dana Zarhin; Ruth Ottman
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Adoption and maintenance of lifestyle modifications.

Authors:  I M Rosenstock
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1988 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Will genetic testing for predisposition for disease result in fatalism? A qualitative study of parents responses to neonatal screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia.

Authors:  V Senior; T M Marteau; T J Peters
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  A consultation with genetic information about obesity decreases self-blame about eating and leads to realistic weight loss goals in obese individuals.

Authors:  Matthias Conradt; Jan-Michael Dierk; Pia Schlumberger; Christina Albohn; Elisabeth Rauh; Anke Hinney; Johannes Hebebrand; Winfried Rief
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 3.006

9.  A common variant in the FTO gene is associated with body mass index and predisposes to childhood and adult obesity.

Authors:  Timothy M Frayling; Nicholas J Timpson; Michael N Weedon; Eleftheria Zeggini; Rachel M Freathy; Cecilia M Lindgren; John R B Perry; Katherine S Elliott; Hana Lango; Nigel W Rayner; Beverley Shields; Lorna W Harries; Jeffrey C Barrett; Sian Ellard; Christopher J Groves; Bridget Knight; Ann-Marie Patch; Andrew R Ness; Shah Ebrahim; Debbie A Lawlor; Susan M Ring; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin; Ulla Sovio; Amanda J Bennett; David Melzer; Luigi Ferrucci; Ruth J F Loos; Inês Barroso; Nicholas J Wareham; Fredrik Karpe; Katharine R Owen; Lon R Cardon; Mark Walker; Graham A Hitman; Colin N A Palmer; Alex S F Doney; Andrew D Morris; George Davey Smith; Andrew T Hattersley; Mark I McCarthy
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  The incidence of co-morbidities related to obesity and overweight: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daphne P Guh; Wei Zhang; Nick Bansback; Zubin Amarsi; C Laird Birmingham; Aslam H Anis
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  15 in total

1.  Beliefs about genetic influences on eating behaviors: Characteristics and associations with weight management confidence.

Authors:  Susan Persky; Sofia Bouhlal; Megan R Goldring; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Eat Behav       Date:  2017-02-09

Review 2.  Personal utility in genomic testing: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Jennefer N Kohler; Erin Turbitt; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  A randomized trial Examining The Impact Of Communicating Genetic And Lifestyle Risks For Obesity.

Authors:  Catharine Wang; Erynn S Gordon; Tricia Norkunas; Lisa Wawak; Ching-Ti Liu; Michael Winter; Rachel S Kasper; Michael F Christman; Robert C Green; Deborah J Bowen
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.002

4.  Genomic Information may Inhibit Weight-Related Behavior Change Inclinations Among Individuals in a Fear State.

Authors:  Susan Persky; Rebecca A Ferrer; William M P Klein
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2016-06

5.  A new approach to assessing affect and the emotional implications of personal genomic testing for common disease risk.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Kenneth P Tercyak; Chanza Baytop; Sharon Hensley Alford; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives.

Authors:  Danya F Vears; Joel T Minion; Stephanie J Roberts; James Cummings; Mavis Machirori; Mwenza Blell; Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne; Lorraine Cowley; Stephanie O M Dyke; Clara Gaff; Robert Green; Alison Hall; Amber L Johns; Bartha M Knoppers; Stephanie Mulrine; Christine Patch; Eva Winkler; Madeleine J Murtagh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Parents' genetic attributions for children's eating behaviors: Relationships with beliefs, emotions, and food choice behavior.

Authors:  Susan Persky; Haley E Yaremych
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 8.  Views on genomic research result delivery methods and informed consent: a review.

Authors:  Danya F Vears; Joel T Minion; Stephanie J Roberts; James Cummings; Mavis Machirori; Madeleine J Murtagh
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  Evaluating Approaches for Communication About Genomic Influences on Body Weight.

Authors:  Susan Persky; Richard L Street
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2015-10

10.  Responses to FTO genetic test feedback for obesity in a sample of overweight adults: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  S F Meisel; J Wardle
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 5.523

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.