Literature DB >> 22030987

Psychological responses to genetic testing for weight gain: a vignette study.

Susanne F Meisel1, Catherine Walker, Jane Wardle.   

Abstract

Genetic testing for obesity risk is increasingly available to the public but few studies have examined motivational or affective reactions. Here we report findings from a "vignette" study investigating reactions to "higher-risk" and "average-risk" results for the obesity-related FTO gene in two groups: a panel sample of individuals with weight concerns, for whom testing may have treatment implications (n = 306, mean age = 45 years, mean BMI = 35) and a student sample (n = 395, mean age = 25 years, mean BMI = 23), for whom testing would have implications for obesity prevention. Participants were given FTO gene information that described higher-risk alleles as linked with modest weight gain and slightly higher risk of obesity. They responded to both higher- and average-risk vignettes, with order randomized. Interest in genetic testing was high overall, and higher in panel respondents than students (93% vs. 78% would "probably" or "definitely" have the test; P < 0.001). In students, a higher-risk result generated higher motivation to change (d = 0.15; P < 0.001), but also slightly higher negative affect (d = 0.03, P < 0.001) and fatalism (d = 0.05, P < 0.001) than an average-risk result. Panel respondents also had higher motivation to change (d = 0.17, P < 0.001) as well as relief about having an explanation for their body weight (d = 0.02, P = 0.013) in the higher-risk condition, but no increase in fatalism or depression. These results suggest that at the level of anticipated responses to FTO gene feedback, higher-risk results had positive motivational effects with minimal changes in negative affect or fatalism. Genetic testing has the potential to be a useful clinical or preventive tool when combined with appropriate information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22030987     DOI: 10.1038/oby.2011.324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)        ISSN: 1930-7381            Impact factor:   5.002


  16 in total

1.  Learning one's genetic risk changes physiology independent of actual genetic risk.

Authors:  Bradley P Turnwald; J Parker Goyer; Danielle Z Boles; Amy Silder; Scott L Delp; Alia J Crum
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2018-12-10

Review 2.  Genetic Testing for Obesity: Implications and Challenges.

Authors:  Mary Segal
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2017-03

3.  P4 medicine: how systems medicine will transform the healthcare sector and society.

Authors:  Mauricio Flores; Gustavo Glusman; Kristin Brogaard; Nathan D Price; Leroy Hood
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  A randomized trial Examining The Impact Of Communicating Genetic And Lifestyle Risks For Obesity.

Authors:  Catharine Wang; Erynn S Gordon; Tricia Norkunas; Lisa Wawak; Ching-Ti Liu; Michael Winter; Rachel S Kasper; Michael F Christman; Robert C Green; Deborah J Bowen
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.002

5.  An experiment assessing effects of personalized feedback about genetic susceptibility to obesity on attitudes towards diet and exercise.

Authors:  Woo-Kyoung Ahn; Matthew S Lebowitz
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.868

6.  Genomic Information may Inhibit Weight-Related Behavior Change Inclinations Among Individuals in a Fear State.

Authors:  Susan Persky; Rebecca A Ferrer; William M P Klein
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2016-06

7.  Randomized trial of personal genomics for preventive cardiology: design and challenges.

Authors:  Joshua W Knowles; Themistocles L Assimes; Michaela Kiernan; Aleksandra Pavlovic; Benjamin A Goldstein; Veronica Yank; Michael V McConnell; Devin Absher; Carlos Bustamante; Euan A Ashley; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Genet       Date:  2012-06

8.  A new approach to assessing affect and the emotional implications of personal genomic testing for common disease risk.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Kenneth P Tercyak; Chanza Baytop; Sharon Hensley Alford; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 2.000

9.  The genetics of childhood obesity and interaction with dietary macronutrients.

Authors:  William S Garver; Sara B Newman; Diana M Gonzales-Pacheco; Joseph J Castillo; David Jelinek; Randall A Heidenreich; Robert A Orlando
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 5.523

Review 10.  Benefits and limitations of genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Vivian Tam; Nikunj Patel; Michelle Turcotte; Yohan Bossé; Guillaume Paré; David Meyre
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 53.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.