Literature DB >> 24292371

Newborn circumcision outcomes: are parents satisfied with the results?

Jennifer J Freeman1, Ariel U Spencer, Robert A Drongowski, Cosmas J M Vandeven, Barbara Apgar, Daniel H Teitelbaum.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: Although physician-reported complications following circumcision are very low, parental satisfaction is not well documented. This study examined parental opinions and compared these with those of the medical professional.
METHODS: Physicians independently assessed complications and cosmetic outcome following the circumcision. Six weeks post-circumcision, parental report of complications, cosmetic outcome, and overall satisfaction were assessed.
RESULTS: Newborn infants (n = 710) were prospectively recruited and underwent either a Gomco [n = 552 (78 %)] or Plastibell(®) [n = 158 (22 %)] circumcision. Physician assessed complication rates were equivalent (Gomco 4.3 % versus Plastibell 5.1 %; p = 0.67), however, parental assessment found a much lower complication rate for Gomco 5.6 % versus Plastibell 12.0 % (p < 0.001). There was no difference between who performed the procedure nor between the techniques in regards to parental rating of overall satisfaction (excellent/good: Gomco 96.9 % versus Plastibell 95.6 %, p = 0.45). However, perceived post-operative pain as scored by parents was significantly higher in patients undergoing Plastibell procedure (6.4 % too much pain) versus Gomco (2.7 %; p = 0.05). Gomco accounted for 72.7 % of parental cosmetically unsatisfactory cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians and parents differed considerably in terms of opinion of cosmetic outcome and occurrence of post-operative complications. This study emphasizes the need for clinicians to better understand and address parental concerns before and after circumcision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24292371     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-013-3430-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  10 in total

1.  Circumcision policy statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Parental evaluation of postoperative outcome of circumcision with Plastibell or conventional dissection by dorsal slit technique: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nilesh G Nagdeve; Harish Naik; Pravin D Bhingare; Suresh M Morey
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 1.830

3.  Complications of circumcision.

Authors:  G W Kaplan
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 2.241

4.  The effect of gender and training of residents on satisfaction ratings by patients.

Authors:  L S Linn; D W Cope; B Leake
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1984-12

5.  The long-term effect of premier pay for performance on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha; Karen E Joynt; E John Orav; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Variability in penile appearance and penile findings: a prospective study.

Authors:  R S Van Howe
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1997-11

Review 7.  Complications of circumcision in male neonates, infants and children: a systematic review.

Authors:  Helen A Weiss; Natasha Larke; Daniel Halperin; Inon Schenker
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 2.264

8.  Male circumcision.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  A report of 918 cases of circumcision with the Shang Ring: comparison between children and adults.

Authors:  XiaoJun Wu; Yongquan Wang; Ji Zheng; Wenhao Shen; Jun-an Yan; Huixiang Ji; Xin Li; Heng Zhang; Zhansong Zhou
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Revision of circumcision in children: Report of 56 cases.

Authors:  Paul A Brisson; Haroon I Patel; Neil R Feins
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.545

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  SmartClamp circumcision versus conventional dissection technique in terms of parental anxiety and outcomes: A prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Mert Ali Karadag; Kursat Cecen; Aslan Demir; Yuksel Kivrak; Murat Bagcioglu; Ramazan Kocaaslan; Mustafa Ari; Fatih Altunrende
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Ritual circumcision and risk of autism spectrum disorder in 0- to 9-year-old boys: national cohort study in Denmark.

Authors:  Morten Frisch; Jacob Simonsen
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  What is the medical evidence on non-therapeutic child circumcision?

Authors:  Matthew Deacon; Gordon Muir
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 2.896

4.  CDC's Male Circumcision Recommendations Represent a Key Public Health Measure.

Authors:  Brian J Morris; John N Krieger; Jeffrey D Klausner
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2017-03-28

5.  Glandular amputation by strangulating tied suture: a case report of late-onset complication in the Plastibell circumcision technique.

Authors:  Jalil Hosseini; Saeid Haghdani; Nima Narimani
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 2.125

6.  Neonatal circumcision and prematurity are associated with sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).

Authors:  Eran Elhaik
Journal:  J Clin Transl Res       Date:  2019-01-09

7.  Comparison of a modified Mogen clamp and classic dorsal slit circumcision under local anesthesia: A clinical study.

Authors:  Yavuz Güler
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2022-08-02

8.  Plastibell Device Circumcision versus Bone Cutter Technique in terms of Operative Outcomes and Parent's Satisfaction.

Authors:  Tahir Mehmood; Hammad Azam; Muhammad Tariq; Zafar Iqbal; Hassan Mehmood; Syed Asif Hussain Shah
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

9.  Bipolar circumcision: A new technique for an old procedure with quantified cosmetic outcome.

Authors:  Naser El-Mefleh; Mahmoud Kaddah; Muhammad Eyad Ba'Ath
Journal:  Afr J Paediatr Surg       Date:  2021 Oct-Dec
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.