Mert Ali Karadag1, Kursat Cecen1, Aslan Demir1, Yuksel Kivrak2, Murat Bagcioglu1, Ramazan Kocaaslan1, Mustafa Ari3, Fatih Altunrende4. 1. Kafkas University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Kars, Turkey; 2. Kafkas University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Kars, Turkey; 3. Mustafa Kemal University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Hatay, Turkey; 4. Bilim University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: We prospectively analyzed parental anxiety and outcomes of the SmartClamp circumcision and the classic surgical dissection technique. METHODS: A total of 250 boys underwent circumcision between 2009 and 2012 at Kars State Hospital and Kafkas University Faculty of Medicine in Turkey. The initial 125 children were circumcised by conventional dissection method and the remaining children were operated on with a SmartClamp device. Children in both groups were compared in terms of bleeding, infection, penile edema, operative time, cosmetic result, length of the inner mucosal layer, and parental anxiety. We used a State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) form to gauge how the circumcision affected parental anxiety. This form was completed by parents on postoperative day 2. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences among the 2 groups in terms of age, bleeding, infection, and cosmetic displeasure (p > 0.05). The STAI scores of the parents from the SmartClamp group were statistically higher than that of the other group (p < 0.001). Penile edema was more common in the SmartClamp group (p = 0.039). However, the mean operative time was statistically shorter (p < 0.001) and the inner mucosal length was significantly longer in the SmartClamp group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Circumcision with the SmartClamp device was faster. Cosmetic results and complication rates were similar. Unfortunately, this technique seemed to entail the disadvantages of longer mucosal length, penile edema, and higher parental anxiety. Urologists should keep these points in mind when choosing a technique.
INTRODUCTION: We prospectively analyzed parental anxiety and outcomes of the SmartClamp circumcision and the classic surgical dissection technique. METHODS: A total of 250 boys underwent circumcision between 2009 and 2012 at Kars State Hospital and Kafkas University Faculty of Medicine in Turkey. The initial 125 children were circumcised by conventional dissection method and the remaining children were operated on with a SmartClamp device. Children in both groups were compared in terms of bleeding, infection, penile edema, operative time, cosmetic result, length of the inner mucosal layer, and parental anxiety. We used a State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) form to gauge how the circumcision affected parental anxiety. This form was completed by parents on postoperative day 2. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences among the 2 groups in terms of age, bleeding, infection, and cosmetic displeasure (p > 0.05). The STAI scores of the parents from the SmartClamp group were statistically higher than that of the other group (p < 0.001). Penile edema was more common in the SmartClamp group (p = 0.039). However, the mean operative time was statistically shorter (p < 0.001) and the inner mucosal length was significantly longer in the SmartClamp group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Circumcision with the SmartClamp device was faster. Cosmetic results and complication rates were similar. Unfortunately, this technique seemed to entail the disadvantages of longer mucosal length, penile edema, and higher parental anxiety. Urologists should keep these points in mind when choosing a technique.
Authors: Ren Chong Xi; Yin Rui Sheng; Wang Hong Chen; Li Sheng; Ji Jing Gang; Zhou Tong; Zhang Shan; Yang Feng Shuo; Zhang Zhi Gang; Yu Guo Sheng; Xu Jun Ling; Guo Hong Ying; Liu Chun Dong; Zhu Kun Ju Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2014 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 1.862