Literature DB >> 23122924

Parental evaluation of postoperative outcome of circumcision with Plastibell or conventional dissection by dorsal slit technique: a randomized controlled trial.

Nilesh G Nagdeve1, Harish Naik, Pravin D Bhingare, Suresh M Morey.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate and compare parental satisfaction after Plastibell and conventional dissection circumcision.
METHODS: 198 children were randomly and equally allocated to two groups (PD: Plastibell and CDS: dissection) for circumcision. Follow-up was done at 7th, 15th and 90th day after surgery. Written questionnaires were given to parents at the time of discharge to complete and return at the 15th and 90th day follow-up visits.
RESULTS: Both groups were balanced with respect to various demographic factors, indications for surgery and Kayaba's classification of the prepuce. Surgical duration was significantly shorter for the PD as compared to the CDS group (5.91 ± 1.74 min vs. 23.52 ± 5.94 min; p < 0.0001 H.S.). Swelling, dysuria and infection were the prominent problems reported in both groups in the first 7 days. The Plastibell separated earlier in younger children (p < 0.0001). Postoperatively, children in the PD group required 2.79 fold more analgesic than those in the CDS group. 97.9% of parents in the PD group and 80.2% of parents in the CDS group claimed satisfactory aesthetic results. The PD group parents were statistically significantly more concerned about swelling.
CONCLUSIONS: Plastibell use has comparable outcomes to the conventional dissection technique for paediatric circumcision and has an obvious advantage of shorter surgical duration. However, it is less comfortable in the postoperative period due to swelling, and requires greater use of analgesics.
Copyright © 2012 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Circumcision; Conventional dissection; Paediatric; Plastibell device

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23122924     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2012.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Urol        ISSN: 1477-5131            Impact factor:   1.830


  3 in total

1.  The characteristics of circular disposable devices and in situ devices for optimizing male circumcision: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu Fan; Dehong Cao; Qiang Wei; Zhuang Tang; Ping Tan; Lu Yang; Liangren Liu; Zhenhua Liu; Xiang Li; Wenbin Xue
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Newborn circumcision outcomes: are parents satisfied with the results?

Authors:  Jennifer J Freeman; Ariel U Spencer; Robert A Drongowski; Cosmas J M Vandeven; Barbara Apgar; Daniel H Teitelbaum
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 3.  Comparison of ring instruments and classic circumcision methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yavuz Güler; Gökhun Çağdaş Özmerdiven; Akif Erbin
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2022-05-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.