Literature DB >> 23465168

A report of 918 cases of circumcision with the Shang Ring: comparison between children and adults.

XiaoJun Wu1, Yongquan Wang, Ji Zheng, Wenhao Shen, Jun-an Yan, Huixiang Ji, Xin Li, Heng Zhang, Zhansong Zhou.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcome and surgical complications in circumcision using the Shang Ring between children and adults.
METHODS: Circumcision using the Shang Ring was performed on 702 adults and 216 children. Comparative analysis on indices including operative time, healing time, postoperative edema, postoperative bleeding, postoperative pain, and postoperative infection was conducted.
RESULTS: When the ring was removed after surgery, the pain was tolerable in the adult group, but more substantial in the child group. The optimal time for removing the ring was 2 weeks after surgery.
CONCLUSION: Special attention to the pain management is needed when using the Shang Ring to treat redundant foreskin or phimosis in children. The timing of the ring removal is critical to avoiding complications. Surgeons' knowledge in urology is also critical to the clinical outcome. Crown
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23465168     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.11.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

1.  SmartClamp circumcision versus conventional dissection technique in terms of parental anxiety and outcomes: A prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Mert Ali Karadag; Kursat Cecen; Aslan Demir; Yuksel Kivrak; Murat Bagcioglu; Ramazan Kocaaslan; Mustafa Ari; Fatih Altunrende
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Newborn circumcision outcomes: are parents satisfied with the results?

Authors:  Jennifer J Freeman; Ariel U Spencer; Robert A Drongowski; Cosmas J M Vandeven; Barbara Apgar; Daniel H Teitelbaum
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Adult male circumcision with a circular stapler versus conventional circumcision: A prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  X D Jin; J J Lu; W H Liu; J Zhou; R K Yu; B Yu; X J Zhang; B H Shen
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 2.590

4.  Novel penile circumcision suturing devices versus the shang ring for adult male circumcision: a prospective study.

Authors:  Hu Han; Da-Wei Xie; Xiao-Guang Zhou; Xiao-Dong Zhang
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

5.  Clinical Outcomes And Risk Factors In Patients Circumcised By Chinese Shang Ring: A Prospective Study Based On Age And Types Of Penile Disease.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Zhenyu Huang; Jun Zhou; Xiansheng Zhang; Chaozhao Liang
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 2.423

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.