Literature DB >> 24288171

Grammatical context constrains lexical competition in spoken word recognition.

Julia Strand1, Andrea Simenstad, Allison Cooperman, Jonathon Rowe.   

Abstract

When perceiving spoken language, listeners must match the incoming acoustic phonetic input to lexical representations in memory. Models that quantify this process propose that the input activates multiple lexical representations in parallel and that these activated representations compete for recognition (Weber & Scharenborg, 2012). In two experiments, we assessed how grammatically constraining contexts alter the process of lexical competition. The results suggest that grammatical context constrains the lexical candidates that are activated to grammatically appropriate competitors. Stimulus words with little competition from items of the same grammatical class benefit more from the addition of grammatical context than do words with more within-class competition. The results provide evidence that top-down contextual information is integrated in the early stages of word recognition. We propose adding a grammatical class level of analysis to existing models of word recognition to account for these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24288171     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-013-0378-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  44 in total

1.  Models of word production.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 2.  Nouns and verbs in the brain: a review of behavioural, electrophysiological, neuropsychological and imaging studies.

Authors:  Gabriella Vigliocco; David P Vinson; Judit Druks; Horacio Barber; Stefano F Cappa
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Models of spoken-word recognition.

Authors:  Andrea Weber; Odette Scharenborg
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-04-02

4.  Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times.

Authors:  Jos J A Van Berkum; Colin M Brown; Pienie Zwitserlood; Valesca Kooijman; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  The hardest butter to button: immediate context effects in spoken word identification.

Authors:  Jon Brock; Kate Nation
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  The structural organization of the mental lexicon and its contribution to age-related declines in spoken-word recognition.

Authors:  M S Sommers
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1996-06

7.  Word Identification in Noise.

Authors:  David B Pisoni
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  1996

8.  Terminating and exhaustive search in lexical access.

Authors:  K I Forster; E S Bednall
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1976-01

9.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Nouns and verbs are retrieved with differently distributed neural systems.

Authors:  A R Damasio; D Tranel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  3 in total

1.  The Impact of Age, Background Noise, Semantic Ambiguity, and Hearing Loss on Recognition Memory for Spoken Sentences.

Authors:  Margaret A Koeritzer; Chad S Rogers; Kristin J Van Engen; Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Grammatical constraints on phonological encoding in speech production.

Authors:  Jordana R Heller; Matthew Goldrick
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12

3.  Pre-Activation Negativity (PrAN) in Brain Potentials to Unfolding Words.

Authors:  Pelle Söderström; Merle Horne; Johan Frid; Mikael Roll
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 3.169

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.