Literature DB >> 21687807

Word Identification in Noise.

David B Pisoni1.   

Abstract

Speech intelligibility has traditionally been measured by presenting words mixed in noise to listeners for identification at several different signal-to-noise ratios. The words are produced in isolation or in sentence contexts where the predictability of specific items can be varied. Psychometric functions are typically obtained relating signal-to-noise ratio to percent correct recognition. Error analyses are often carried out by examining response confusions to construct similarity spaces for words which reflect their perceptual organisation and acoustic-phonetic similarity. When using these techniques to measure speech discrimination or speech intelligibility in an open-set format, the recognition score obtained reflects the combined influence of both the sensory information encoded in the speech signal as well as the listener's decision process and response biases. Despite this limitation, the procedure has strong face validity as a measure of word recognition performance in normal-hearing listeners as well as other clinical populations which routinely use speech audiometry techniques to diagnose and assess both peripheral and central hearing impairments. All of the major findings and phenomena in the spoken word recognition literature can be demonstrated and explored with this experimental method. This technique continues to provide extremely valuable information about the organisation of words in the mental lexicon and how these sound patterns are accessed from acoustic-phonetic information in the speech signal.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 21687807      PMCID: PMC3115543          DOI: 10.1080/016909696387097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Cogn Process        ISSN: 0169-0965


  20 in total

1.  Multiple-choice intelligibility tests.

Authors:  J W BLACK
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1957-06

2.  Intelligibility as a function of frequency of usage.

Authors:  M R ROSENZWEIG; L POSTMAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1957-12

3.  The development of recorded auditory tests for measuring hearing loss for speech.

Authors:  C V HUDGINS; J E HAWKINS
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1947-01       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition.

Authors:  J W Mullennix; D B Pisoni; C S Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Consonant confusions in noise: a study of perceptual features.

Authors:  M D Wang; R C Bilger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A masking noise with speech-envelope characteristics for studying intelligibility.

Authors:  Y Horii; A S House; G W Hughes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The development of constant items for speech discrimination testing.

Authors:  E Owens; E D Schubert
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1968-09

8.  What's new in speech perception? The research and ideas of William Chandler Bagley, 1874-1946.

Authors:  R A Cole; A I Rudnicky
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Speech quality evaluation using "phoneme-specific" sentences.

Authors:  A W Huggins; R S Nickerson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Talker effects on word-discrimination scores of adults with sensorineural hearing impairment.

Authors:  J P Penrod
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1979-08
View more
  10 in total

1.  Visibility of speech articulation enhances auditory phonetic convergence.

Authors:  James W Dias; Lawrence D Rosenblum
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  The cortical organization of lexical knowledge: a dual lexicon model of spoken language processing.

Authors:  David W Gow
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Implicit statistical learning in language processing: word predictability is the key.

Authors:  Christopher M Conway; Althea Bauernschmidt; Sean S Huang; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-11-18

4.  Insights into failed lexical retrieval from network science.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Kit Ying Chan; Rutherford Goldstein
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Perception of formulaic and novel expressions under acoustic degradation.

Authors:  C Sophia Rammell; Diana Van Lancker Sidtis; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Ment Lex       Date:  2018-03-15

6.  The Auditory English Lexicon Project: A multi-talker, multi-region psycholinguistic database of 10,170 spoken words and nonwords.

Authors:  Winston D Goh; Melvin J Yap; Qian Wen Chee
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-10

7.  Grammatical context constrains lexical competition in spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Julia Strand; Andrea Simenstad; Allison Cooperman; Jonathon Rowe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-05

8.  Perception of Tamil Mono-Syllabic and Bi-Syllabic Words in Multi-Talker Speech Babble by Young Adults with Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Sasirekha Gnanasekar; Ramya Vaidyanath
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2019-06-25

9.  Correspondence Between Cognitive and Audiological Evaluations Among the Elderly: A Preliminary Report of an Audiological Screening Model of Subjects at Risk of Cognitive Decline With Slight to Moderate Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Alessandro Castiglione; Mariella Casa; Samanta Gallo; Flavia Sorrentino; Sonila Dhima; Dalila Cilia; Elisa Lovo; Marta Gambin; Maela Previato; Simone Colombo; Ezio Caserta; Flavia Gheller; Cristina Giacomelli; Silvia Montino; Federica Limongi; Davide Brotto; Carlo Gabelli; Patrizia Trevisi; Roberto Bovo; Alessandro Martini
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Infants generalize representations of statistically segmented words.

Authors:  Katharine Graf Estes
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-10-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.