Literature DB >> 24282465

The role of PSA density to predict a pathological tumour upgrade between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy for low risk clinical prostate cancer in the modified Gleason system era.

Stavros Sfoungaristos1, Ioannis Katafigiotis, Petros Perimenis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We evaluate the role of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict Gleason score upgrade between prostate biopsy material and radical prostatectomy specimen examination in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
METHODS: Between January 2007 and November 2011, 133 low-risk patients underwent a radical prostatectomy. Using the modified Gleason criteria, tumour grade of the surgical specimens was examined and compared to the biopsy results.
RESULTS: A tumour upgrade was noticed in 57 (42.9%) patients. Organ-confined disease was found in 110 (82.7%) patients, while extracapsular disease and seminal vesicles invasion was found in 19 (14.3%) and 4 (3.0%) patients, respectively. Positive surgical margins were reported in 23 (17.3%) patients. A statistical significant correlation between the preoperative PSA density value and postoperative upgrade was found (p = 0.001) and this observation had a predictive value (p = 0.002); this is in contrast to the other studied parameters which failed to reach significance, including PSA, percentage of cancer in biopsy and number of biopsy cores. Tumour upgrade was also highly associated with extracapsular cancer extension (p = 0.017) and the presence of positive surgical margins (p = 0.017).
CONCLUSIONS: PSA density represents a strong predictor for Gleason score upgrade after radical prostatectomy in patients with clinical low-risk disease. Since tumour upgrade increases the potential for postoperative pathological adverse findings and prognosis, PSA density should be considered when treating and consulting patients with low-risk prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24282465      PMCID: PMC3840515          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  24 in total

1.  Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging. 1974.

Authors:  Donald F Gleason; George T Mellinger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein; William C Allsbrook; Mahul B Amin; Lars L Egevad
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  The significance of modified Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Burkhard Helpap; Lars Egevad
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Correlation between Gleason score of needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen: accuracy and clinical implications.

Authors:  M S Cookson; N E Fleshner; S M Soloway; W R Fair
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Upgrade in Gleason score between prostate biopsies and pathology following radical prostatectomy significantly impacts upon the risk of biochemical recurrence.

Authors:  Niall M Corcoran; Matthew K H Hong; Rowan G Casey; Antonio Hurtado-Coll; Justin Peters; Laurence Harewood; S Larry Goldenberg; Chris M Hovens; Anthony J Costello; Martin E Gleave
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Biopsy Gleason score: how does it correlate with the final pathological diagnosis in prostate cancer?

Authors:  E T Fernandes; C P Sundaram; R Long; M Soltani; C J Ercole
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1997-04

7.  Prostate cancer volume at biopsy predicts clinically significant upgrading.

Authors:  Fei Dong; J Stephen Jones; Andrew J Stephenson; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; Alwyn M Reuther; Eric A Klein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Role of PSA velocity in predicting pathologic upgrade for Gleason 6 prostate cancer.

Authors:  L Spencer Krane; Mani Menon; Sanjeev A Kaul; Sameer A Siddiqui; Christel Wambi; James O Peabody; Piyush K Agarwal
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 3.498

9.  Use of prostate-specific antigen and tumor volume in predicting needle biopsy grading error.

Authors:  M Kojima; P Troncoso; R J Babaian
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz; Liying Zhang; Adam Lam; Robert Nam; Alexandre Mamedov; Andrew Loblaw
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  4 in total

1.  The core of the matter: Using pathology instead of ultrasound to measure prostate volume.

Authors:  Selahattin Calışkan
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Prostate-specific antigen density values among patients with symptomatic prostatic enlargement in Nigeria.

Authors:  Emeka I Udeh; Ikenna I Nnabugwu; Francis O Ozoemena; Fred O Ugwumba; Adesina S O Aderibigbe; Samuel R Ohayi; Kevin N Echetabu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 2.754

3.  Predicting Gleason score using the initial serum total prostate-specific antigen in Black men with symptomatic prostate adenocarcinoma in Nigeria.

Authors:  Ikenna I Nnabugwu; Emeka I Udeh; Fredrick O Ugwumba; Francis O Ozoemena
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 4.458

4.  The role of prostate-specific antigen density in men with low-risk prostate cancer suitable for active surveillance: results of a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Arcangelo Sebastianelli; Simone Morselli; Ferdinando Daniele Vitelli; Linda Gabellini; Giovanni Tasso; Stefano Venturini; Gianmartin Cito; Graziano Vignolini; Maria Rosaria Raspollini; Mauro Gacci; Sergio Serni
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2019-02-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.