Literature DB >> 7538243

Use of prostate-specific antigen and tumor volume in predicting needle biopsy grading error.

M Kojima1, P Troncoso, R J Babaian.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To study the discrepancy between histologic grades of needle biopsy and prostatectomy specimens and to define the potential role of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA density, and tumor volume in predicting the tumor grade.
METHODS: Histopathologic grades on needle biopsy and subsequent radical prostatectomy specimens were compared in 135 patients with clinically organ-confined prostate cancer. The frequency of undergrading (difference of one or more grades) by needle biopsy was then compared to PSA, PSA density, and other preoperative parameters.
RESULTS: The frequency of undergrading by one level was 45% using the M. D. Anderson Hospital (MDAH) system and 47% using the Gleason system. When the tumor grades were classified into two categories, undergrading rates of 26% (low to high grade by the MDAH system) and 21% (moderately well to poorly differentiated by the Gleason system) were noted. Serum PSA and PSA density correlated with the grading error rate: the higher the PSA and PSA density values, the higher the biopsy undergrading rate. PSA showed a significant correlation with undergrading (P = 0.0019). Undergrading occurred in 32% of patients with a PSA more than 4 and 10 ng/mL or less and in 47% of those with a serum PSA more than 10 ng/mL. In all cases when the PSA was 4 ng/mL or less, the needle biopsy results correctly predicted the final tumor grade category. Tumor volume was not associated with frequency of undergrading.
CONCLUSIONS: The ability to predict tumor grade can be enhanced by considering the serum PSA value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7538243     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)80088-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  8 in total

Review 1.  Methods for volume assessment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Stefan Corvin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-02-06       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Upgrading and downgrading of prostate cancer from biopsy to radical prostatectomy: incidence and predictive factors using the modified Gleason grading system and factoring in tertiary grades.

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein; Zhaoyong Feng; Bruce J Trock; Phillip M Pierorazio
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  The role of PSA density to predict a pathological tumour upgrade between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy for low risk clinical prostate cancer in the modified Gleason system era.

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Ioannis Katafigiotis; Petros Perimenis
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Clinical and pathological variables that predict changes in tumour grade after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Petros Perimenis
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Pathological correlation between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen in patients with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Muhammad A Bulbul; Yaser El-Hout; Maurice Haddad; Ayman Tawil; Ali Houjaij; Nizar Bou Diab; Oussama Darwish
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  DNA Ploidy as surrogate for biopsy gleason score for preoperative organ versus nonorgan-confined prostate cancer prediction.

Authors:  Sumit Isharwal; M Craig Miller; Jonathan I Epstein; Leslie A Mangold; Elizabeth Humphreys; Alan W Partin; Robert W Veltri
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?

Authors:  Byung-Soo Jin; Seok-Hyun Kang; Duk-Yoon Kim; Hoon-Gyu Oh; Chun-Il Kim; Gi-Hak Moon; Tae-Gyun Kwon; Jae-Shin Park
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-09-02

8.  Factors predicting Gleason score 6 upgrading after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Daimantas Milonas; Aivaras Grybas; Stasys Auskalnis; Inga Gudinaviciene; Ruslanas Baltrimavicius; Marius Kincius; Mindaugas Jievaltas
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2011-12-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.