| Literature DB >> 24278239 |
Zhuo Wang1, Kalisa G Myers, Yumei Guo, Marco A Ocampo, Raina D Pang, Michael W Jakowec, Daniel P Holschneider.
Abstract
Exercise training is widely used for neurorehabilitation of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, little is known about the functional reorganization of the injured brain after long-term aerobic exercise. We examined the effects of 4 weeks of forced running wheel exercise in a rat model of dopaminergic deafferentation (bilateral, dorsal striatal 6-hydroxydopamine lesions). One week after training, cerebral perfusion was mapped during treadmill walking or at rest using [(14)C]-iodoantipyrine autoradiography. Regional cerebral blood flow-related tissue radioactivity (rCBF) was analyzed in three-dimensionally reconstructed brains by statistical parametric mapping. In non-exercised rats, lesions resulted in persistent motor deficits. Compared to sham-lesioned rats, lesioned rats showed altered functional brain activation during walking, including: 1. hypoactivation of the striatum and motor cortex; 2. hyperactivation of non-lesioned areas in the basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuit; 3. functional recruitment of the red nucleus, superior colliculus and somatosensory cortex; 4. hyperactivation of the ventrolateral thalamus, cerebellar vermis and deep nuclei, suggesting recruitment of the cerebellar-thalamocortical circuit; 5. hyperactivation of limbic areas (amygdala, hippocampus, ventral striatum, septum, raphe, insula). These findings show remarkable similarities to imaging findings reported in PD patients. Exercise progressively improved motor deficits in lesioned rats, while increasing activation in dorsal striatum and rostral secondary motor cortex, attenuating a hyperemia of the zona incerta and eliciting a functional reorganization of regions participating in the cerebellar-thalamocortical circuit. Both lesions and exercise increased activation in mesolimbic areas (amygdala, hippocampus, ventral striatum, laterodorsal tegmental n., ventral pallidum), as well as in related paralimbic regions (septum, raphe, insula). Exercise, but not lesioning, resulted in decreases in rCBF in the medial prefrontal cortex (cingulate, prelimbic, infralimbic). Our results in this PD rat model uniquely highlight the breadth of functional reorganizations in motor and limbic circuits following lesion and long-term, aerobic exercise, and provide a framework for understanding the neural substrates underlying exercise-based neurorehabilitation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24278239 PMCID: PMC3836982 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080058
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Timeline of experiments.
Figure 2Training speeds during 4 weeks of forced running wheel exercise.
Lesioned rats received four 5-min exercise sessions/day (2 min. intersession interval) and 5 consecutive days/week beginning 2 weeks after bilateral striatal lesioning.
Figure 36-OHDA lesions.
Shown are the effect of bilateral striatal lesions on (A) lesion volume (% of striatal volume), (B) tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) staining of the striatum, (C) TH staining of the substantia nigra reticulata (SNR), and (D) TH staining of the substantia nigra compacta (SNC). #: significant difference between sham rats without exercise training (Sham/No-ET) and lesioned rats without ET (Lesion/No-ET), P<0.05, Student’s t test. *: significant difference between Lesion/No-ET and Lesion/ET, P<0.01, Student’s t test. The inset in (A) shows a representative TH stained coronal section showing bilateral depletion of TH (outlined in red).
Figure 4Striatal lesioning-induced motor deficits and exercise training (ET)-induced recovery in motor function.
(A–E) Time course of motor tests results. Main effect of lesion was analyzed with repeated measure two-way ANOVA comparing Sham/No-ET (n = 19) and Lesion/No-ET (n = 19) groups over the 6 weeks period after lesioning (time of lesioning was denoted with the arrows). Lesion-induced motor deficits were significant in all motor tests, and post hoc tests showed significant lesion-induced deficits at all time points. Main effect of ET was analyzed with repeated measure two-way ANOVA comparing Lesion/No-ET and Lesion/ET (n = 23) groups over the 4 weeks ET period (denoted by the horizontal bars). ET-induced improvements were significant for the rearing, accelerating rotarod, and adjusting step tests, with nonsignificant trends shown in the beam crossing tests. *: signifcant effect of ET by post hoc tests (P<0.05). Only data for the left forehand adjusting step test were shown, which were representative of all four adjusting step tests. (F) The radar graph depicts the deficit (as a % of prelesion baseline) for each motor test at the 6 week time point. Four-week ET induced statistically significant improvement in all motor tests (P<0.05, Student’s t-test) except the round beam test (P = 0.09).
Figure 7Functional activation of dorsal striatum (d-CPu) and rostral secondary motor cortex (rostral M2).
Activation is attenuated after lesioning and is augmented by exercise training (ET). Row 1 depicts a top-down view of the cerebral cortex, while row 2 shows activation at a transverse slice at the level of the dorsal striatum (AP +3.7 mm to AP −10.6 mm). Significant changes are shown for the walk-vs.-rest comparison. Colored overlays show statistically significant positive (red) and negative (blue) differences (voxel level, P<0.05). Abbreviations are those noted in the legend of Fig. 5.
Figure 5Functional brain activation in rats with bilateral striatal lesions and sham-lesioned rats.
Shown are statistically significant differences in activation during acute treadmill walking (Lesion/Walk/No-ET, n = 9, Sham/Walk/No-ET, n = 10) or at rest (Lesion/Rest/No-ET, n = 10, Sham/Rest/No-ET, n = 9). Comparison highlights lesion effects (Lesion vs. Sham) or the effect of walking (Walk vs. Rest). No exercise training (ET) was given. Depicted is a selection of representative coronal slices (anterior–posterior coordinates relative to bregma). Colored overlays show statistically significant positive (red) and negative (blue) differences. Abbreviations are those from the Paxinos and Watson rat atlas [39]: 5 (trigeminal n., motor, sensory), aca (anterior commissures), BL (basolateral amygdalar n.), Ce (central amygdalar n.), Cg (cingulate cortex), CM (central medial thalamic n.), CPu (striatum: anterior, ant-CPu; dorsal, d-CPu; ventral, v-CPu), d-HPC (dorsal hippocampus), DP (dorsal peduncular cortex), DS (dorsal subiculum), Ect (ectorhinal cortex), Ent (entorhinal cortex), GPe (external globus pallidus), GPi (internal globus pallidus/entopeduncular n.), I (insular cortex), IC (inferior colliculus), IL (infralimbic cortex), IP (interpeduncular n.), La (lateral amygdalar n.), LO (lateral orbital cortex), LP (lateral posterior thalamic n.), LS (lateral septum), M1, M2 (primary, secondary motor cortex), Me (medial amygdalar n.), MS (medial septum), mRT (mesencephalic reticular formation), Nv (navicular n.), PaS (parasubiculum), PH (posterior hypothalamus), Pir (piriform cortex), Pn (pons), PrL (prelimbic cortex), PtA (parietal association cortex), RPC (red n.), RS (retrosplenial cortex), S1DZ, S1FL, S1J, S1Tr, S1ULp, (primary somatosensory cortex: dysgranular, forelimb, jaw, trunk, upper lip), S2 (secondary somatosensory cortex), SC (superior colliculus), SN (substantia nigra), STN (subthalamic n.), TT (tenia tecta), vermis (2nd, 3rd cerebellar simple lobule), V1, V2 (primary, secondary visual cortex), v-HPC (ventral hippocampus), VL (ventral lateral thalamic n.), VM (ventromedial thalamic n.), VMH (ventromedial hypothalamus), VPL/VPM (ventral posterolateral, ventral posteromedial thalamic nuclei), VP (ventral pallidum), VS (ventral subiculum), ZI (zona inserta).
Regions of statistically significant differences of functional cerebral cortical activation as determined by SPM analysis.
| Walk vs.Rest | Lesion vs.Sham | ET vs.No-ET | |||||
| Lesion | Lesion | Sham | Walk | Rest | Walk | Rest | |
|
| ET | No-ET | No-ET | No-ET | No-ET | Lesion | Lesion |
|
| −/− | (−)/0 | −/− | 0/(+) | (+)/0 | 0/(−) | (+)/+ |
|
| +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | −/− | (−)/0 | ||
|
| +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | −/− | |
|
| −/− | −/− | −/− | /− | (+)/(+) | (+)/+ | |
|
| +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | +/(+) | +/+ |
|
| +/+ | (+)/(+) | +/+ | −/− | |||
|
| −/− | −/− | −/− | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | (−)/(−) |
|
| +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | −/− | −/(−) | ||
|
| +/+ | 0/(+) | +/+ | −/− | 0/(−) | (+)/(+) | (−)/(−) |
|
| +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | −/− | (−)/− | (−)/(−) | |
|
| +/+ | (+)/(+) | −/− | ||||
|
| +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | 0/− | (−)/(−) | −/0 | |
|
| −/− | (−)/(−) | +/+ | +/+ | (−)/(−) | (+)/(+) | |
|
| +/+ | (+)/(+) | +/0 | −/− | (−)/(−) | ||
|
| +/+ a | +/+ a | +/+ a | 0/− | −/− | 0/+ | |
| −/− p | |||||||
|
| +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | −/(−) | |||
|
| (+)/(+) | −/− | (+)/(+) | (−)/0 | −/− | ||
|
| −/− | −/(−) | −/− | 0/(+) | |||
|
| −/− | −/− | −/− | (+)/+ | +/+ | (+)/0 | |
|
| −/− | −/− | −/− | 0/(+) | +/+ | ||
|
| −/− a, | −/− a, | −/− a, | +/(+) a | +/+ a, p | (−)/0 a | |
| +/+ p | +/+ p | +/+ p | |||||
|
| (+)/(+) | (+)/(+) | +/+ | −/(−) | +/0 | ||
|
| +/+ | +/+ | (+)/(+) | −/(−) | 0/− | ||
Data are for rats with bilateral striatal lesions, sham lesions, during treadmill walking or at rest, and with or without a prior history of exercise training (Groups: Lesion/Walk/No-ET, n = 9; Sham/Walk/No-ET, n = 10; Lesion/Rest/No-ET, n = 10; Sham/Rest/No-ET, n = 9; Lesion/Walk/ET, n = 11; Lesion/Rest/ET, n = 12). Significance for all entries is shown at the voxel level (P<0.05) with a minimum extent threshold of 100 contiguous voxels. ‘a’ denotes ‘anterior’ and ‘p’ denotes ‘posterior’. ‘+’ denotes increases and ‘−’ denotes decreases in the group differences in cerebral blood flow tracer distribution in the left/right hemispheres, with symbols in parentheses denoting changes less broadly represented.
Factorial analysis showing regions of statistical significant differences in functional brain activation.
| Lesion | Lesion×Walk | Exercise | Exercise×Walk | |
|
| CPu (anterior, dorsal), GPe,GPi, M2 (rostral, caudal) | CPu (anterior, dorsal), M1,M2 (rostral), VL | CPu (dorsal), GPi, M2(rostral), VL | CPu (anterior, dorsal), GPe,GPi, M1, M2 (rostral), VL |
|
| RPC, SC, trigeminal n.(motor/sensory), ZI | SC | PTg, SC | PTg, RPC, SC, ZI |
|
| deep cerebellar nuclei(medial, lateral, interposed),vermis | vermis, VL | vermis, VL | deep cerebellar nuclei (medial,lateral, interposed), VL |
|
| Ect, S1FL, S1J, S1UL, S2 | Ect, S1FL, S1Tr, S2, V1 | Ect, PtA, S1FL | Au, PtA, S1DZ, S1Tr |
|
| CM, VL, VM, VPL/VPM | VA | Hb, VA, VL | VA, VL, VPL/VPM, Rt |
|
| Acb, Amygdala (BL, Ce, APir,AHi), DEn, dHPC, Ent, insula,Pir, raphe, RS, septum(MS, LS), tegmental n. (DTg, LDTg),vCPu, vHPC | Acb, Amygdala (BL, Ce, LA,Me, cortical, APir, AHi), DEn,dHPC, insula, Pir, subiculum (Post,VS), RS, vCPu, VMH,vHPC | Acb, Amygdala (BL, LA),dHPC, Ent, mPFC (Cg, PrL, IL),MS, Pir, RS, subiculum (Post, VS),tegmental n. (DTg, LDTg),vCPu, VP | Amygdala (BL, Ce, Me,APir, AHi), DEn, dHPC, DEn,Ent, insula, LPAG, LS, orbitalcx (LO, VO), subiculum (Post, VS),vHPC |
Shown is the main effect in non-exercised rats of Lesion and the Lesion×Walk interaction (Groups: Lesion/Walk/No-ET, n = 9; Sham/Walk/No-ET, n = 10; Lesion/Rest/No-ET, n = 10; Sham/Rest/No-ET, n = 9). Also shown is the main effect in lesioned rats of Exercise and the Exercise×Walk interaction (Lesion/Walk/No-ET, n = 9; Lesion/Rest/No-ET, n = 10; Lesion/Walk/ET, n = 11; Lesion/Rest/ET, n = 12). Significance (*) for all entries is shown at the voxel level (P<0.05) with a minimum extent threshold of 100 contiguous voxels. Abbreviations are those from the Paxinos and Watson rat atlas [39]: 5 (trigeminal n., motor, sensory), aca (anterior commissures), AHi (amygdalo-hippocampal area); APir (amygdalo-piriform transition area); BL (basolateral amygdala), Ce (central amygdalar n.), Cg (cingulate cortex), CM (central medial thalamic n.), CPu (striatum: anterior, ant-CPu; dorsal, d-CPu; ventral, v-CPu), d-HPC (dorsal hippocampus), DTg/LDTg (dorsal/laterodorsal tegmental n.), Ent (entorhinal cortex), GPe (external globus pallidus), GPi (internal globus pallidus/entopeduncular n.), Hb (habenula), I (insular cortex), IL (infralimbic cortex), La (lateral amygdala), LO (lateral orbital cortex), LP (lateral posterior thalamic n.), LS (lateral septum), M1, M2 (primary, secondary motor cortex), Me (medial amygdala), MS (medial septum), Pir (piriform cortex), PrL (prelimbic cortex), PtA (parietal association cortex), PTg (pedunculopontine tegmental n.), RPC (red n.), RS (retrosplenial cortex), S1DZ, S1FL, S1J, S1Tr, S1ULp, (primary somatosensory cortex: dysgranular, forelimb, jaw, trunk, lip), S2 (secondary somatosensory cortex), SC (superior colliculus), vermis (2nd, 3rd cerebellar simple lobule), V1, V2 (primary, secondary visual cortex), v-HPC (ventral hippocampus), VL (ventral lateral thalamic n.), VM (ventromedial thalamic n.), VMH (ventromedial hypothalamus), VPL/VPM (ventral posterolateral, ventral posteromedial thalamic nuclei), VP (ventral pallidum), VS (ventral subiculum), ZI (zona inserta).
Figure 6Effects of prior exercise training (ET) on functional brain activation.
Shown are statistically significant differences in activation during acute treadmill walking (ET/Walk, n = 11, No-ET/Walk, n = 9) or at rest (ET/Rest, n = 12, No-ET/Rest, n = 10) in rats with bilateral striatal lesions. Depicted is a selection of representative coronal slices (anterior–posterior coordinates relative to bregma). Colored overlays show statistically significant positive (red) and negative (blue) differences (voxel level, P<0.05). Abbreviations are those noted in the legend of Fig. 5.
Regions of statistically significant differences of functional subcortical activation as determined by SPM analysis.
| Walk vs.Rest | Lesion vs.Sham | ET vs.No-ET | |||||
| Lesion | Lesion | Sham | Walk | Rest | Walk | Rest | |
|
| ET | No-ET | No-ET | No-ET | No-ET | Lesion | Lesion |
|
| + | + | + | – | – | – | |
|
| + | + | + | −3Cb | + | – | – |
|
| (−)/(−) | (+)/(+) | +/+ | +/(+) | −/− | ||
|
| −/− | −/− | −/− | +/+ | +/+ | −/− | |
|
| (−)/(−) | −/− | (−)/(−) | (+)/(+) | +/+ | +/+ | (−)/(−) |
|
| (−)/(−) | −/− | (−)/(−) | (+)/0 | +/+ | +/+ | |
|
| −/− | −/− | +/+ | ||||
|
| (−)/(−) | (−)/− | −/(−) | +/+ | +/+ | −/(−) | |
|
| (+)/(+) | −/− | +/+ | −/− | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ |
|
| +/+ | (−)/0 | +/+ | −/− | −/− | +/+ | −/(−) |
|
| −/− | −/− | −/− | (+)/0 | |||
|
| (−)/(−) | (−)/(−) | (−)/(−) | 0/(+) | |||
|
| −/− | −/− | −/(−) | +/(+) | (+)/+ | (+)/0 | |
|
| +/+ | 0/(+) | (+)/(+) | 0/(−) | (+)/(+) | ||
|
| |||||||
|
| −/− | (−)/(−) | −/− | ||||
|
| – | – | – | + | + | ||
|
| (+)/+ | +/+ | −/− | −/− | |||
|
| +/+ | +/+ | |||||
|
| −/− | −/− | −/− | +/+ | −/(−) | ||
|
| −/− | +/+ | (+)/+ | ||||
|
| −/− | −/− | −/− | (−)/0 | +/+ | (+)/+ | |
|
| −/− | −/− | −/− | +/+ | +/+ | ||
|
| −/− | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | |||
|
| |||||||
|
| −/− | −/− | −/− | /(+) | +/+ | +/+ | −/(−) |
|
| −/− | −/− | (−)/(−) | /(+) | +/+ | +/+ | |
|
| −/− | −/− | (−)/(−) | −/− | +/+ | 0/(+) | |
|
| (−)/(−) | −/− | +/+ | 0/(−) | (−)/− | −/(−) | |
|
| +/+ | −/− | +/+ | (−)/(−) | (−)/− | (+)/(+) | |
|
| +/+ | −/− | +/+ | +/(+) | (−)/− | (+)/(+) | |
|
| −/− | +/+ | 0/(−) | (−)/(−) | (+)/+ | ||
|
| +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | −/− | −/− | +/+ | (−)/(−) |
|
| +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | (+)/0 | +/+ | |
|
| (−)/(−) | −/− | −/− | ||||
|
| (−)/− | −/− | (+)/(+) | (+)/(+) | |||
|
| −/− | −/− | −/− | 0/(+) | (+)/(+) | ||
|
| – | (−) | + | + | (−) | ||
|
| (+) | + | + | + | + | – | (−) |
|
| (+)/(+) | +/+ | (+)/(+) | +/+ | +/+ | −/− | (+)/(+) |
|
| −/− | −/− | −/− | (+)/0 | +/+ | (+)/(+) | |
|
| +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | ||||
|
| (+)/(+) | −/(−) | +/+ | −/− | (+)/(+) | +/+ | |
|
| +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | 0/(+) | (−)/− | +/+ | |
|
| +/+ | +/+ | (−)/(−) | (−)/(−) | |||
|
| −/− | −/− | (+)/(+) | (+)/(+) | +/+ | ||
|
| |||||||
|
| −/− | −/− | (−)/0 | +/+ | (+)/(+) | 0/+ | |
|
| 0/− | −/− | +/(+) | ||||
|
| (−)/(−) | (−)/(−) | (−)/(−) | +/+ | +/+ | ||
|
| – | – | – | + | + | (−) | (−) |
|
| −/− | −/− | +/+ | ||||
|
| (−)/(−) | −/(−) | (−)/(−) | (+)/(+) | (+)/(+) | (−)/0 | |
|
| −/− | −/− | −/− | (+)/0 | (+)/(+) | ||
|
| −/− | +/+ | +/+ | −/− | |||
|
| −/− | +/+ | +/+ | −/− | (+)/(+) | ||
Data are for rats with bilateral striatal lesions, sham lesions, during treadmill walking or at rest, and with or without a prior history of exercise training (Groups: Lesion/Walk/No-ET, n = 9; Sham/Walk/No-ET, n = 10; Lesion/Rest/No-ET, n = 10; Sham/Rest/No-ET, n = 9; Lesion/Walk/ET, n = 11; Lesion/Rest/ET, n = 12). Significance for all entries is shown at the voxel level (P<0.05) with a minimum extent threshold of 100 contiguous voxels. ‘a’ denotes ‘anterior’ and ‘p’ denotes ‘posterior’. ‘+’ denotes increases and ‘−’ denotes decreases in the group differences in cerebral blood flow tracer distribution in the left/right hemispheres, with symbols in parentheses denoting changes less broadly represented.