Literature DB >> 15195287

Reduced recruitment of motor association areas during bimanual coordination in concert pianists.

Bernhard Haslinger1, Peter Erhard, Eckart Altenmüller, Andreas Hennenlotter, Markus Schwaiger, Helga Gräfin von Einsiedel, Ernst Rummeny, Bastian Conrad, Andrés O Ceballos-Baumann.   

Abstract

Bimanual motor coordination is essential for piano playing. The functional neuronal substrate for high-level bimanual performance achieved by professional pianists is unclear. We compared professional pianists to musically naïve controls while carrying out in-phase (mirror) and anti-phase (parallel) bimanual sequential finger movements during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). This task corresponds to bimanually playing scales practiced daily by pianists from the beginning of piano playing. Musicians and controls showed significantly different functional activation patterns. When comparing performance of parallel movements to rest, musically naïve controls showed stronger activations than did pianists within a network including anterior cingulate cortex, right dorsal premotor cortex, both cerebellar hemispheres, and right basal ganglia. The direct comparison of bimanual parallel to mirror movements between both groups revealed stronger signal increases in controls within mesial premotor cortex (SMA), bilateral cerebellar hemispheres and vermis, bilateral prefrontal cortex, left ventral premotor cortex, right anterior insula, and right basal ganglia. These findings suggest increased efficiency of cortical and subcortical systems for bimanual movement control in musicians. This may be fundamental to achieve high-level motor skills allowing the musician to focus on artistic aspects of musical performance. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15195287      PMCID: PMC6871883          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  68 in total

1.  Variability in fMRI: an examination of intersession differences.

Authors:  D J McGonigle; A M Howseman; B S Athwal; K J Friston; R S Frackowiak; A P Holmes
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  The prefrontal cortex: response selection or maintenance within working memory?

Authors:  J B Rowe; I Toni; O Josephs; R S Frackowiak; R E Passingham
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-06-02       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Cerebellar mediation of the complexity of bimanual compared to unimanual movements.

Authors:  J I Tracy; S S Faro; F B Mohammed; A B Pinus; S M Madi; J W Laskas
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-11-27       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Synaptic proliferation in the motor cortex of adult cats after long-term thalamic stimulation.

Authors:  A Keller; K Arissian; H Asanuma
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Functional mapping of sequence learning in normal humans.

Authors:  S T Grafton; E Hazeltine; R Ivry
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Functional anatomy of musical processing in listeners with absolute pitch and relative pitch.

Authors:  R J Zatorre; D W Perry; C A Beckett; C F Westbury; A C Evans
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Role of the supplementary motor area and the right premotor cortex in the coordination of bimanual finger movements.

Authors:  N Sadato; Y Yonekura; A Waki; H Yamada; Y Ishii
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Role of the human rostral supplementary motor area and the basal ganglia in motor sequence control: investigations with H2 15O PET.

Authors:  H Boecker; A Dagher; A O Ceballos-Baumann; R E Passingham; M Samuel; K J Friston; J Poline; C Dettmers; B Conrad; D J Brooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Neuronal activity in cortical motor areas related to ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral digit movements of the monkey.

Authors:  J Tanji; K Okano; K C Sato
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Lesions of premotor cortex in man.

Authors:  H J Freund; H Hummelsheim
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  62 in total

Review 1.  What can studying musicians tell us about motor control of the hand?

Authors:  Alan H D Watson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Finding your voice: a singing lesson from functional imaging.

Authors:  Sarah J Wilson; David F Abbott; Dean Lusher; Ellen C Gentle; Graeme D Jackson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Extensive training of elementary finger tapping movements changes the pattern of motor cortex excitability.

Authors:  S Koeneke; K Lutz; U Herwig; U Ziemann; L Jäncke
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Sequence learning in pianists and nonpianists: an fMRI study of motor expertise.

Authors:  Susan M Landau; Mark D'esposito
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Neural correlates of emotional intelligence in adolescent children.

Authors:  William D S Killgore; Deborah A Yurgelun-Todd
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Cortical areas functionally linked with the cerebellar second homunculus during out-of-phase bimanual movements.

Authors:  Christophe Habas; Emmanuel Alain Cabanis
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2006-02-08       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Motorcortical excitability and synaptic plasticity is enhanced in professional musicians.

Authors:  Karin Rosenkranz; Aaron Williamon; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Emerging and disappearing synergies in a hierarchically controlled system.

Authors:  Stacey L Gorniak; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Hemispheric lateralization does not affect the cognitive and mechanical cost of a sequential motor task.

Authors:  Christoph Schütz; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Interactions between new and pre-existing dynamics in bimanual movement control.

Authors:  Deborah J Serrien
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.