PURPOSE: Spatial covariance analysis has been used with FDG PET to identify a specific metabolic network associated with Parkinson's disease (PD). In the current study, we utilized a new, fully automated voxel-based method to quantify network expression in ECD SPECT images from patients with classical PD, patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA), and healthy control subjects. METHODS: We applied a previously validated voxel-based PD-related covariance pattern (PDRP) to quantify network expression in the ECD SPECT scans of 35 PD patients, 15 age- and disease severity-matched MSA patients, and 35 age-matched healthy control subjects. PDRP scores were compared across groups using analysis of variance. The sensitivity and specificity of the prospectively computed PDRP scores in the differential diagnosis of individual subjects were assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: PDRP scores were significantly increased (p < 0.001) in the PD group relative to the MSA and control groups. ROC analysis indicated that the overall diagnostic accuracy of the PDRP measures was 0.91 (AUC). The optimal cutoff value was consistent with a sensitivity of 0.97 and a specificity of 0.80 and 0.71 for discriminating PD patients from MSA and normal controls, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that fully automated voxel-based network assessment techniques can be used to quantify network expression in the ECD SPECT scans of parkinsonian patients.
PURPOSE: Spatial covariance analysis has been used with FDG PET to identify a specific metabolic network associated with Parkinson's disease (PD). In the current study, we utilized a new, fully automated voxel-based method to quantify network expression in ECD SPECT images from patients with classical PD, patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA), and healthy control subjects. METHODS: We applied a previously validated voxel-based PD-related covariance pattern (PDRP) to quantify network expression in the ECD SPECT scans of 35 PDpatients, 15 age- and disease severity-matched MSA patients, and 35 age-matched healthy control subjects. PDRP scores were compared across groups using analysis of variance. The sensitivity and specificity of the prospectively computed PDRP scores in the differential diagnosis of individual subjects were assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: PDRP scores were significantly increased (p < 0.001) in the PD group relative to the MSA and control groups. ROC analysis indicated that the overall diagnostic accuracy of the PDRP measures was 0.91 (AUC). The optimal cutoff value was consistent with a sensitivity of 0.97 and a specificity of 0.80 and 0.71 for discriminating PDpatients from MSA and normal controls, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that fully automated voxel-based network assessment techniques can be used to quantify network expression in the ECD SPECT scans of parkinsonianpatients.
Authors: M Fukuda; M J Mentis; Y Ma; V Dhawan; A Antonini; A E Lang; A M Lozano; J Hammerstad; K Lyons; W C Koller; J R Moeller; D Eidelberg Journal: Brain Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Thomas Eckert; Michael Sailer; Joern Kaufmann; Christoph Schrader; Thomas Peschel; Nils Bodammer; Hans Jochen Heinze; Mircea Ariel Schoenfeld Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: D Eidelberg; J R Moeller; V Dhawan; P Spetsieris; S Takikawa; T Ishikawa; T Chaly; W Robeson; D Margouleff; S Przedborski Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 1994-09 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Florian Holtbernd; Jean-François Gagnon; Ron B Postuma; Yilong Ma; Chris C Tang; Andrew Feigin; Vijay Dhawan; Mélanie Vendette; Jean-Paul Soucy; David Eidelberg; Jacques Montplaisir Journal: Neurology Date: 2014-01-22 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Yilong Ma; Chaorui Huang; Jonathan P Dyke; Hong Pan; David Alsop; Andrew Feigin; David Eidelberg Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2010-01-06 Impact factor: 6.200