Literature DB >> 24277804

Anthropogenic emissions of methane in the United States.

Scot M Miller1, Steven C Wofsy, Anna M Michalak, Eric A Kort, Arlyn E Andrews, Sebastien C Biraud, Edward J Dlugokencky, Janusz Eluszkiewicz, Marc L Fischer, Greet Janssens-Maenhout, Ben R Miller, John B Miller, Stephen A Montzka, Thomas Nehrkorn, Colm Sweeney.   

Abstract

This study quantitatively estimates the spatial distribution of anthropogenic methane sources in the United States by combining comprehensive atmospheric methane observations, extensive spatial datasets, and a high-resolution atmospheric transport model. Results show that current inventories from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research underestimate methane emissions nationally by a factor of ∼1.5 and ∼1.7, respectively. Our study indicates that emissions due to ruminants and manure are up to twice the magnitude of existing inventories. In addition, the discrepancy in methane source estimates is particularly pronounced in the south-central United States, where we find total emissions are ∼2.7 times greater than in most inventories and account for 24 ± 3% of national emissions. The spatial patterns of our emission fluxes and observed methane-propane correlations indicate that fossil fuel extraction and refining are major contributors (45 ± 13%) in the south-central United States. This result suggests that regional methane emissions due to fossil fuel extraction and processing could be 4.9 ± 2.6 times larger than in EDGAR, the most comprehensive global methane inventory. These results cast doubt on the US EPA's recent decision to downscale its estimate of national natural gas emissions by 25-30%. Overall, we conclude that methane emissions associated with both the animal husbandry and fossil fuel industries have larger greenhouse gas impacts than indicated by existing inventories.

Entities:  

Keywords:  climate change policy; geostatistical inverse modeling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24277804      PMCID: PMC3864315          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1314392110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  3 in total

1.  Global atmospheric methane: budget, changes and dangers.

Authors:  Edward J Dlugokencky; Euan G Nisbet; Rebecca Fisher; David Lowry
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Extensive regional atmospheric hydrocarbon pollution in the southwestern United States.

Authors:  Aaron S Katzenstein; Lambert A Doezema; Isobel J Simpson; Donald R Blake; F Sherwood Rowland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  On the sources of methane to the Los Angeles atmosphere.

Authors:  Paul O Wennberg; Wilton Mui; Debra Wunch; Eric A Kort; Donald R Blake; Elliot L Atlas; Gregory W Santoni; Steven C Wofsy; Glenn S Diskin; Seongeun Jeong; Marc L Fischer
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 9.028

  3 in total
  34 in total

1.  Reconciling divergent estimates of oil and gas methane emissions.

Authors:  Daniel Zavala-Araiza; David R Lyon; Ramón A Alvarez; Kenneth J Davis; Robert Harriss; Scott C Herndon; Anna Karion; Eric Adam Kort; Brian K Lamb; Xin Lan; Anthony J Marchese; Stephen W Pacala; Allen L Robinson; Paul B Shepson; Colm Sweeney; Robert Talbot; Amy Townsend-Small; Tara I Yacovitch; Daniel J Zimmerle; Steven P Hamburg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Direct measurements of methane emissions from abandoned oil and gas wells in Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Mary Kang; Cynthia M Kanno; Matthew C Reid; Xin Zhang; Denise L Mauzerall; Michael A Celia; Yuheng Chen; Tullis C Onstott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Role of natural gas in meeting an electric sector emissions reduction strategy and effects on greenhouse gas emissions.

Authors:  Carol Lenox; P Ozge Kaplan
Journal:  Energy Econ       Date:  2016

4.  Livestock methane emissions in the United States.

Authors:  Alexander N Hristov; Kristen A Johnson; Ermias Kebreab
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Reply to Hristov et al.: Linking methane emissions inventories with atmospheric observations.

Authors:  Scot M Miller; Anna M Michalak; Steven C Wofsy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Toward a better understanding and quantification of methane emissions from shale gas development.

Authors:  Dana R Caulton; Paul B Shepson; Renee L Santoro; Jed P Sparks; Robert W Howarth; Anthony R Ingraffea; Maria O L Cambaliza; Colm Sweeney; Anna Karion; Kenneth J Davis; Brian H Stirm; Stephen A Montzka; Ben R Miller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Methanogenesis marker protein 10 (Mmp10) from Methanosarcina acetivorans is a radical S-adenosylmethionine methylase that unexpectedly requires cobalamin.

Authors:  Matthew I Radle; Danielle V Miller; Tatiana N Laremore; Squire J Booker
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Limited impact on decadal-scale climate change from increased use of natural gas.

Authors:  Haewon McJeon; Jae Edmonds; Nico Bauer; Leon Clarke; Brian Fisher; Brian P Flannery; Jérôme Hilaire; Volker Krey; Giacomo Marangoni; Raymond Mi; Keywan Riahi; Holger Rogner; Massimo Tavoni
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Continued emissions of carbon tetrachloride from the United States nearly two decades after its phaseout for dispersive uses.

Authors:  Lei Hu; Stephen A Montzka; Ben R Miller; Arlyn E Andrews; John B Miller; Scott J Lehman; Colm Sweeney; Scot M Miller; Kirk Thoning; Carolina Siso; Elliot L Atlas; Donald R Blake; Joost de Gouw; Jessica B Gilman; Geoff Dutton; James W Elkins; Bradley Hall; Huilin Chen; Marc L Fischer; Marikate E Mountain; Thomas Nehrkorn; Sebastien C Biraud; Fred L Moore; Pieter Tans
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Global methane emissions from coal mining to continue growing even with declining coal production.

Authors:  Nazar Kholod; Meredydd Evans; Raymond C Pilcher; Volha Roshchanka; Felicia Ruiz; Michael Coté; Ron Collings
Journal:  J Clean Prod       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 9.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.