Literature DB >> 22853880

On the sources of methane to the Los Angeles atmosphere.

Paul O Wennberg1, Wilton Mui, Debra Wunch, Eric A Kort, Donald R Blake, Elliot L Atlas, Gregory W Santoni, Steven C Wofsy, Glenn S Diskin, Seongeun Jeong, Marc L Fischer.   

Abstract

We use historical and new atmospheric trace gas observations to refine the estimated source of methane (CH(4)) emitted into California's South Coast Air Basin (the larger Los Angeles metropolitan region). Referenced to the California Air Resources Board (CARB) CO emissions inventory, total CH(4) emissions are 0.44 ± 0.15 Tg each year. To investigate the possible contribution of fossil fuel emissions, we use ambient air observations of methane (CH(4)), ethane (C(2)H(6)), and carbon monoxide (CO), together with measured C(2)H(6) to CH(4) enhancement ratios in the Los Angeles natural gas supply. The observed atmospheric C(2)H(6) to CH(4) ratio during the ARCTAS (2008) and CalNex (2010) aircraft campaigns is similar to the ratio of these gases in the natural gas supplied to the basin during both these campaigns. Thus, at the upper limit (assuming that the only major source of atmospheric C(2)H(6) is fugitive emissions from the natural gas infrastructure) these data are consistent with the attribution of most (0.39 ± 0.15 Tg yr(-1)) of the excess CH(4) in the basin to uncombusted losses from the natural gas system (approximately 2.5-6% of natural gas delivered to basin customers). However, there are other sources of C(2)H(6) in the region. In particular, emissions of C(2)H(6) (and CH(4)) from natural gas seeps as well as those associated with petroleum production, both of which are poorly known, will reduce the inferred contribution of the natural gas infrastructure to the total CH(4) emissions, potentially significantly. This study highlights both the value and challenges associated with the use of ethane as a tracer for fugitive emissions from the natural gas production and distribution system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22853880     DOI: 10.1021/es301138y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  4 in total

1.  Reconciling divergent estimates of oil and gas methane emissions.

Authors:  Daniel Zavala-Araiza; David R Lyon; Ramón A Alvarez; Kenneth J Davis; Robert Harriss; Scott C Herndon; Anna Karion; Eric Adam Kort; Brian K Lamb; Xin Lan; Anthony J Marchese; Stephen W Pacala; Allen L Robinson; Paul B Shepson; Colm Sweeney; Robert Talbot; Amy Townsend-Small; Tara I Yacovitch; Daniel J Zimmerle; Steven P Hamburg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Anthropogenic emissions of methane in the United States.

Authors:  Scot M Miller; Steven C Wofsy; Anna M Michalak; Eric A Kort; Arlyn E Andrews; Sebastien C Biraud; Edward J Dlugokencky; Janusz Eluszkiewicz; Marc L Fischer; Greet Janssens-Maenhout; Ben R Miller; John B Miller; Stephen A Montzka; Thomas Nehrkorn; Colm Sweeney
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Methane emissions from natural gas infrastructure and use in the urban region of Boston, Massachusetts.

Authors:  Kathryn McKain; Adrian Down; Steve M Raciti; John Budney; Lucy R Hutyra; Cody Floerchinger; Scott C Herndon; Thomas Nehrkorn; Mark S Zahniser; Robert B Jackson; Nathan Phillips; Steven C Wofsy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Large Fugitive Methane Emissions From Urban Centers Along the U.S. East Coast.

Authors:  Genevieve Plant; Eric A Kort; Cody Floerchinger; Alexander Gvakharia; Isaac Vimont; Colm Sweeney
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 4.720

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.