Literature DB >> 24270970

Clinical outcomes after salvage radiotherapy without androgen deprivation therapy in patients with persistently detectable PSA after radical prostatectomy: results from a national multicentre study.

Guillaume Ploussard1, Frédéric Staerman, Jean Pierrevelcin, Sébastien Larue, Arnauld Villers, Adil Ouzzane, Cyrille Bastide, Nicolas Gaschignard, François Buge, Christian Pfister, Romain Bonniol, Xavier Rebillard, Saad Fadli, Nicolas Mottet, Fabien Saint, Rodrigue Saad, Jean-Baptiste Beauval, Morgan Roupret, François Audenet, Mickaël Peyromaure, Nicolas Barry Delongchamps, Sébastien Vincendeau, Tarek Fardoun, Jérôme Rigaud, Michel Soulie, Laurent Salomon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess oncologic outcomes after salvage radiotherapy (SRT) without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with persistently detectable PSA after radical prostatectomy (RT).
METHODS: Two hundred and one patients who failed to achieve an undetectable PSA received SRT without ADT. The primary endpoint was failure to SRT that was defined by clinical progression or use of second-line ADT. Clinicopathological parameters, 6-week PSA level, PSAV and pre-SRT PSA levels were assessed using time-dependent analyses.
RESULTS: Median postoperative 6-week PSA and pre-SRT PSA levels were 0.25 and 0.48 ng/mL, respectively. Median time between surgery and SRT was 7 months. Failure to SRT was reported in 42.8 % of cases with the need for second-line ADT in 26.9 % of cases. Pre-SRT PSA was strongly correlated with postoperative 6-week PSA (p < 0.001) but not with PSAV. The risk of SRT failure was increased by threefold in case of Gleason score 8-10 (p = 0.036) or pT3b cancer (p = 0.006). Risk group classification based on these prognostic factors improved SRT failure prediction. Survival curves confirmed that 5-year ADT-free survival rates were significantly influenced by PSAV (p = 0.002) and pre-SRT PSA (p = 0.030).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with persistently detectable PSA after RP and selected for local salvage treatment, SRT offers good oncologic clinical outcomes. The most powerful pathologic predictive factors of SRT failure include a pT3b stage, a Gleason score 8 or more cancer and high PSAV and pre-SRT PSA levels. Patients having a high PSAV >0.04 ng/mL/mo would be potentially better candidates for a systemic therapy due to a high SRT failure rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24270970     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-013-1214-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  27 in total

1.  Ultrasensitive serum prostate specific antigen nadir accurately predicts the risk of early relapse after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Samson Shen; Herbert Lepor; Robert Yaffee; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Steven Joniau; Malcolm Mason; Vsevolod Matveev; Nicolas Mottet; Hans-Peter Schmid; Theo van der Kwast; Thomas Wiegel; Filliberto Zattoni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Incidence of benign and malignant prostate tissue in biopsies of the bladder neck after a radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  D P Wood; S J Peretsman; T M Seay
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Analysis of apical soft tissue margins during radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  O Shah; J Melamed; H Lepor
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate adenocarcinoma: analysis of efficacy and prognostic factors.

Authors:  Ashish K Chawla; Harjot K Thakral; Anthony L Zietman; William U Shipley
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  C R Pound; A W Partin; M A Eisenberger; D W Chan; J D Pearson; P C Walsh
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-05-05       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Predicting the outcome of salvage radiation therapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew J Stephenson; Peter T Scardino; Michael W Kattan; Thomas M Pisansky; Kevin M Slawin; Eric A Klein; Mitchell S Anscher; Jeff M Michalski; Howard M Sandler; Daniel W Lin; Jeffrey D Forman; Michael J Zelefsky; Larry L Kestin; Claus G Roehrborn; Charles N Catton; Theodore L DeWeese; Stanley L Liauw; Richard K Valicenti; Deborah A Kuban; Alan Pollack
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Time to second prostate-specific antigen failure is a surrogate endpoint for prostate cancer death in a prospective trial of therapy for localized disease.

Authors:  A L Zietman; K C Dallow; P A McManus; N M Heney; W U Shipley
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Achieving an undetectable PSA after radiotherapy for biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy is an independent predictor of biochemical outcome--results of a retrospective study.

Authors:  Thomas Wiegel; Gunnar Lohm; Dirk Bottke; Stefan Höcht; Kurt Miller; Alessandra Siegmann; Martin Schostak; Konrad Neumann; Wolfgang Hinkelbein
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 10.  Variables in predicting survival based on treating "PSA-only" relapse.

Authors:  Judd W Moul
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.498

View more
  5 in total

1.  Detectable Prostate-specific antigen value between 0.01 and 0.1 ng/ml following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP): does it correlate with future biochemical recurrence?

Authors:  Ahmed S Zakaria; Russell N Schwartz; Amr Hodhod; Félix Couture; Côme Tholomier; Hanna Shahine; Cristina Negrean; David-Dan Nguyen; Marc Zanaty; Franziska Stolzenbach; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Assaad El-Hakim; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Optimal timing of salvage radiotherapy for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: is ultra-early salvage radiotherapy beneficial?

Authors:  Satoru Taguchi; Kenshiro Shiraishi; Hiroshi Fukuhara; Keiichi Nakagawa; Teppei Morikawa; Akihiro Naito; Shigenori Kakutani; Yuta Takeshima; Hideyo Miyazaki; Tohru Nakagawa; Tetsuya Fujimura; Haruki Kume; Yukio Homma
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 3.  Stereotactic Radiotherapy after Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Prostate Cancer in the Adjuvant or Salvage Setting: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christina Schröder; Hongjian Tang; Paul Windisch; Daniel Rudolf Zwahlen; André Buchali; Erwin Vu; Tilman Bostel; Tanja Sprave; Thomas Zilli; Vedang Murthy; Robert Förster
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 4.  Saudi oncology society and Saudi urology association combined clinical management guidelines for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ashraf Abusamra; Esam Murshid; Hussain Kushi; Sultan Alkhateeb; Mubarak Al-Mansour; Ahmad Saadeddin; Danny Rabah; Shouki Bazarbashi; Mohammed Alotaibi; Abdullah Alghamdi; Khalid Alghamdi; Abdullah Alsharm; Imran Ahmad
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

Review 5.  Saudi Oncology Society and Saudi Urology Association combined clinical management guidelines for prostate cancer 2017.

Authors:  Ali Aljubran; Ashraf Abusamra; Sultan Alkhateeb; Mohammed Alotaibi; Danny Rabah; Shouki Bazarbashi; Hussain Alkushi; Mubarak Al-Mansour; Hulayel Alharbi; Amin Eltijani; Abdullah Alghamdi; Abdullah Alsharm; Imran Ahmad; Esam Murshid
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.