Literature DB >> 11371886

Analysis of apical soft tissue margins during radical retropubic prostatectomy.

O Shah1, J Melamed, H Lepor.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We determine the use of information gained with intraoperative biopsy and frozen section analysis of the apical soft tissue margin during nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A separate 2 to 3 mm. circumferential biopsy was obtained from the apical soft tissue margin, and was sent for frozen and permanent section analysis during radical retropubic prostatectomy in 95 men with clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate. A single pathologist examined the surgical and apical soft tissue margin specimens for evidence and extent of benign or malignant prostate tissue. Urinary continence was evaluated at catheter removal and 3 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Of the patients 26% had positive surgical margins, of which 64% were positive apical margins. Permanent section of the apical soft tissue biopsy revealed no prostate in 39%, benign prostate in 54% and prostate cancer in 7% of patients. Because of the frozen section finding of adenocarcinoma in 3 patients, the apical soft tissue margin was further resected until the specimen was negative for malignancy. The apical soft tissue margin was the only positive margin site in 2 of these 3 patients. Positive surgical and apical margins, and percent tumor volumes greater than 26% on prostatectomy specimen had a significantly higher likelihood for positive apical soft tissue margins. The pathological finding of a positive apical margin on the surgical specimen had sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 57%, 86%, 25% and 96%, respectively, for detecting prostate cancer on the apical soft tissue biopsy. Of the apical soft tissue biopsies 54% contained an element of benign prostatic tissue, although 92% of them contained benign tissue in less than 25% of the total specimen. Mean continence score in the men with and those without benign prostate tissue on apical soft tissue biopsy was 15.6 and 14.4, respectively (p = 0.15). The percent of men who required no protective pads for urinary continence at 3 months was 53% and 65% for those who had no prostate and those who had benign prostate tissue, respectively, in the apical soft tissue margin.
CONCLUSIONS: Excising and submitting an additional 2 to 3 mm. of apical soft tissue margin for permanent section analysis after prostate removal during radical prostatectomy represent an effective method for decreasing residual prostate tissue. Attempts at maximizing urethral length when dividing the prostato-urethral junction likely increases the chance of leaving residual prostate without improving continence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11371886     DOI: 10.1097/00005392-200106000-00023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  8 in total

1.  Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

Review 2.  Value of frozen section biopsies during radical prostatectomy: significance of the histological results.

Authors:  Miguel Ramírez-Backhaus; Robert Rabenalt; Sunjay Jain; Minh Do; Evangelos Liatsikos; Roman Ganzer; Lars-Christian Horn; Martin Burchardt; Fernando Jiménez-Cruz; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Status of radical prostatectomy in 2009: is there medical evidence to justify the robotic approach?

Authors:  Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2009

4.  Effect of soy protein isolate supplementation on biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Maarten C Bosland; Ikuko Kato; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Joanne Schmoll; Erika Enk Rueter; Jonathan Melamed; Max Xiangtian Kong; Virgilia Macias; Andre Kajdacsy-Balla; L H Lumey; Hui Xie; Weihua Gao; Paul Walden; Herbert Lepor; Samir S Taneja; Carla Randolph; Michael J Schlicht; Hiroko Meserve-Watanabe; Ryan J Deaton; Joanne A Davies
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Randomized trial comparing an anterograde versus a retrograde approach to open radical prostatectomy: results in terms of positive margin rate.

Authors:  Alessandro Sciarra; Cristiano Cristini; Magnus Von Heland; Stefano Salciccia; Vincenzo Gentile
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Clinical outcomes after salvage radiotherapy without androgen deprivation therapy in patients with persistently detectable PSA after radical prostatectomy: results from a national multicentre study.

Authors:  Guillaume Ploussard; Frédéric Staerman; Jean Pierrevelcin; Sébastien Larue; Arnauld Villers; Adil Ouzzane; Cyrille Bastide; Nicolas Gaschignard; François Buge; Christian Pfister; Romain Bonniol; Xavier Rebillard; Saad Fadli; Nicolas Mottet; Fabien Saint; Rodrigue Saad; Jean-Baptiste Beauval; Morgan Roupret; François Audenet; Mickaël Peyromaure; Nicolas Barry Delongchamps; Sébastien Vincendeau; Tarek Fardoun; Jérôme Rigaud; Michel Soulie; Laurent Salomon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  The impact of single positive surgical margin features on biochemical recurrence after robotic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ismail Evren; Ahmet Hacıislamoğlu; Mithat Ekşi; Abdullah Hizir Yavuzsan; Firat Baytekin; Yunus Çolakoğlu; Didem Canoğlu; Volkan Tugcu
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

8.  Blunt apical dissection during anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Kazunori Namiki; Ali Kasraeian; Saif Yacoub; Charles J Rosser
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2009-02-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.