Literature DB >> 32696130

Detectable Prostate-specific antigen value between 0.01 and 0.1 ng/ml following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP): does it correlate with future biochemical recurrence?

Ahmed S Zakaria1, Russell N Schwartz1, Amr Hodhod2, Félix Couture3, Côme Tholomier2, Hanna Shahine1, Cristina Negrean1, David-Dan Nguyen4, Marc Zanaty5, Franziska Stolzenbach1, Pierre I Karakiewicz1, Assaad El-Hakim1, Kevin C Zorn6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of having a nadir and persistently detectable ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen (uPSA) between 0.01 and 0.1 ng/ml post-robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), on future biochemical recurrence (BCR).
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained cohort of 1359 men who underwent RARP, between 2006 and 2019. Patients were followed with uPSA at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 months and annually thereafter. We included patients with PSA nadir values between 0.01 and 0.1 ng/ml within 6 months of surgery and with at least 2 follow-up measurements within the same range. We divided patients based on their BCR status and analyzed uPSA changes. Multivariable Cox-regression models (CRMs) were used to analyze variables predicting BCR-free survival (BCR-FS).
RESULTS: We identified 167 (12.3%) patients for analyses, with a mean follow-up time of 60.2 ± 31.4 months. In our cohort, 5-year BCR-FS rate was 86%. Overall, 32 (19.1%) patients had BCR, with a mean time to BCR of 43.7 ± 24.3 months. BCR-free patients had stable mean uPSA values ≤ 0.033 ng/ml, while patients who developed BCR showed a slowly rising trend over time, with a significant difference between groups starting at 9 months (p < 0.02). In multivariable CRMs, a rising uPSA starting at 9 months was an independent predictor of BCR (HR: 2.7; 95% CI 1.6-3.82; p = 0.013).
CONCLUSION: In the present cohort, our results demonstrated that a considerable number of men have detectable uPSA values ranging between 0.01 and 0.1 ng/ml post-RARP. They can still be followed regularly to avoid patients' anxiety and salvage radiotherapy. Close follow-up is still required.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biochemical recurrence; Prostate cancer; Prostate-specific antigen nadir; Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy

Year:  2020        PMID: 32696130     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03367-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  25 in total

1.  Time trends in biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results of the SEARCH database.

Authors:  Stephen J Freedland; Joseph C Presti; Christopher L Amling; Christopher J Kane; William J Aronson; Frederick Dorey; Martha K Terris
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 2.  Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience.

Authors:  M Han; A W Partin; C R Pound; J I Epstein; P C Walsh
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.241

3.  Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  C R Pound; A W Partin; M A Eisenberger; D W Chan; J D Pearson; P C Walsh
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-05-05       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The natural history of metastatic progression in men with prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Zhaoyong Feng; Bruce J Trock; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Michael A Carducci; Alan W Partin; Patrick C Walsh; Mario A Eisenberger
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Prostate-specific antigen after anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. Patterns of recurrence and cancer control.

Authors:  C R Pound; A W Partin; J I Epstein; P C Walsh
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.241

6.  Prostate cancer-specific survival following salvage radiotherapy vs observation in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Bruce J Trock; Misop Han; Stephen J Freedland; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Theodore L DeWeese; Alan W Partin; Patrick C Walsh
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Clinical significance and treatment of biochemical recurrence after definitive therapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Wilmer B Roberts; Misop Han
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 3.279

8.  The incidence and significance of detectable levels of serum prostate specific antigen after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  J G Trapasso; J B deKernion; R B Smith; F Dorey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  Comparison of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Open Radical Prostatectomy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hyun Ju Seo; Na Rae Lee; Soo Kyung Son; Dae Keun Kim; Koon Ho Rha; Seon Heui Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.759

10.  Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. Part II: Recommended Approaches and Details of Specific Care Options.

Authors:  Martin G Sanda; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Erin Kirkby; Ronald C Chen; Tony Crispino; Joann Fontanarosa; Stephen J Freedland; Kirsten Greene; Laurence H Klotz; Danil V Makarov; Joel B Nelson; George Rodrigues; Howard M Sandler; Mary Ellen Taplin; Jonathan R Treadwell
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.