PURPOSE: Ultrasensitive prostate specific antigen (PSA) assays allow a lower limit of detection (less than 0.01 ng/ml) than standard PSA assays. In this study we examined the ability of ultrasensitive PSA nadir to predict relapse after radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 906 men treated with RP were followed with PSA measurements at 3, 6 and 12 months, and yearly thereafter. Of the 906 men 545 (60%) with a PSA nadir of less than 0.01 ng/ml or at least 3 followup ultrasensitive PSA measurements underwent analysis and stratification by PSA nadir. Biochemical relapse was defined as 2 consecutive increasing post-nadir PSA measurements of 0.1 ng/ml or greater. The ability of ultrasensitive PSA nadir to predict relapse was assessed by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: At a mean followup of 3.1 years 54 of 545 men (9.9%) experienced biochemical relapse with a mean time to relapse of 25.2 months. Relapse rates in men with a PSA nadir of less than 0.01 (423), 0.01 (75), 0.02 (19) and 0.04 or greater ng/ml (28) were 4%, 12%, 16% and 89%, respectively. Men with a nadir of less than 0.01 ng/ml had a significantly lower relapse rate than men with a nadir of 0.01 (p <0.01), 0.02 (p <0.025) or 0.04 or greater ng/ml (p <0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that a nadir of 0.01 (p <0.05), 0.02 (p <0.05) and 0.04 or greater ng/ml (p <0.01) independently predicted an increased risk of biochemical relapse compared to a nadir of less than 0.01 ng/ml. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasensitive PSA nadir accurately predicts the risk of early biochemical relapse following RP. Men who achieve a nadir of less than 0.01 ng/ml have a low likelihood of early relapse. Higher nadir points may identify candidates for early adjuvant or salvage therapies.
PURPOSE: Ultrasensitive prostate specific antigen (PSA) assays allow a lower limit of detection (less than 0.01 ng/ml) than standard PSA assays. In this study we examined the ability of ultrasensitive PSA nadir to predict relapse after radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 906 men treated with RP were followed with PSA measurements at 3, 6 and 12 months, and yearly thereafter. Of the 906 men 545 (60%) with a PSA nadir of less than 0.01 ng/ml or at least 3 followup ultrasensitive PSA measurements underwent analysis and stratification by PSA nadir. Biochemical relapse was defined as 2 consecutive increasing post-nadir PSA measurements of 0.1 ng/ml or greater. The ability of ultrasensitive PSA nadir to predict relapse was assessed by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: At a mean followup of 3.1 years 54 of 545 men (9.9%) experienced biochemical relapse with a mean time to relapse of 25.2 months. Relapse rates in men with a PSA nadir of less than 0.01 (423), 0.01 (75), 0.02 (19) and 0.04 or greater ng/ml (28) were 4%, 12%, 16% and 89%, respectively. Men with a nadir of less than 0.01 ng/ml had a significantly lower relapse rate than men with a nadir of 0.01 (p <0.01), 0.02 (p <0.025) or 0.04 or greater ng/ml (p <0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that a nadir of 0.01 (p <0.05), 0.02 (p <0.05) and 0.04 or greater ng/ml (p <0.01) independently predicted an increased risk of biochemical relapse compared to a nadir of less than 0.01 ng/ml. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasensitive PSA nadir accurately predicts the risk of early biochemical relapse following RP. Men who achieve a nadir of less than 0.01 ng/ml have a low likelihood of early relapse. Higher nadir points may identify candidates for early adjuvant or salvage therapies.
Authors: François Audenet; Elise Seringe; Sarah J Drouin; Eva Comperat; Olivier Cussenot; Marc-Olivier Bitker; Morgan Rouprêt Journal: World J Urol Date: 2011-06-03 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: W S A Smellie; J Forth; S Sundar; E Kalu; C A M McNulty; E Sherriff; I D Watson; C Croucher; T M Reynolds; P J Carey Journal: J Clin Pathol Date: 2006-05-19 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Dmitry Koulikov; Maura C Mohler; Diana C Mehedint; Kristopher Attwood; Gregory E Wilding; James L Mohler Journal: J Urol Date: 2014-05-21 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Anunita Khasgiwala; Ankur M Doshi; Justin M Ream; Samir S Taneja; Herbert Lepor Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2017-01
Authors: C Shad Thaxton; Robert Elghanian; Audrey D Thomas; Savka I Stoeva; Jae-Seung Lee; Norm D Smith; Anthony J Schaeffer; Helmut Klocker; Wolfgang Horninger; Georg Bartsch; Chad A Mirkin Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-10-19 Impact factor: 11.205