Literature DB >> 24268880

Infant robotic pyeloplasty: comparison with an open cohort.

D Bansal1, N G Cost1, W R DeFoor1, P P Reddy1, E A Minevich1, B A Vanderbrink1, S Alam1, C A Sheldon1, P H Noh2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To present our experience with infant pyeloplasty, comparing outcomes between robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) and open pyeloplasty (OP).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all children <1 year of age who underwent unilateral dismembered pyeloplasty at a single pediatric institution since January 2007. Patients with standard laparoscopic pyeloplasty were excluded. Patient demographics, intraoperative details, narcotic usage, and complications were reviewed.
RESULTS: A total of 70 infants (51 boys and 19 girls) were identified, with nine RALP and 61 OP performed. Median age was 9.2 months (range, 3.7-11.9 months) for RALP and 4.1 months (range, 1.0-11.6 months) for OP (p = 0.005). Median weight was 8 kg (range, 5.8-10.9 kg) for RALP and 7 kg (range, 4-14 kg) for OP (p = 0.163). Median operative time was 115 min (range, 95-205 min) for RALP and 166 min (range, 79-300 min) for OP (p = 0.028). Median hospital stay was 1 day (range, 1-2 days) for RALP and 3 days (range, 1-7 days) for OP (p < 0.001). Median postoperative narcotic use of morphine equivalent was <0.01 mg/kg/day (range, 0-0.1 mg/kg/day) for RALP and 0.05 mg/kg/day (range, 0-2.2 mg/kg/day) for OP (p < 0.001). Median follow-up was 10 months (range, 7.2-17.8 months) for RALP and 43.6 months (3.4-73.8 months) for OP (p < 0.001). The success rate was 100% for RALP and 98% for OP.
CONCLUSIONS: Infant RALP was observed to be feasible and efficacious with shorter operative time, hospital stay, and narcotic utilization than OP.
Copyright © 2013 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Infant; Pyeloplasty; Robotic; Ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24268880     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Urol        ISSN: 1477-5131            Impact factor:   1.830


  13 in total

1.  Pediatric Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Michael V Hollis; Patricia S Cho; Richard N Yu
Journal:  Am J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-12

Review 2.  Surgical Approaches to Pediatric Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.

Authors:  Ryan W Tubre; John M Gatti
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Instituting robotic pediatric urologic surgery in the Canadian healthcare system: Evaluating the feasibility and outcomes of robot-assisted pyeloplasty and ureteric reimplantation.

Authors:  Noah Stern; Peter Wang; Sumit Dave
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population: a review of technique, outcomes, complications, and special considerations in infants.

Authors:  William R Boysen; Mohan S Gundeti
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 5.  Global trends in paediatric robot-assisted urological surgery: a bibliometric and Progressive Scholarly Acceptance analysis.

Authors:  Thomas P Cundy; Simon J D Harley; Hani J Marcus; Archie Hughes-Hallett; Sanjeev Khurana
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-04-28

6.  Robotic partial nephrectomy in a child with kidney tumor.

Authors:  Sibel Tiryaki; Burak Turna; Erkan Kısmalı; İbrahim Ulman
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-08-28

Review 7.  Comparing the efficacy and safety between robotic-assisted versus open pyeloplasty in children: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shang-Jen Chang; Chun-Kai Hsu; Cheng-Hsing Hsieh; Stephen Shei-Dei Yang
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Pyeloplasty in children: perioperative results and long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared to open surgery.

Authors:  Martin Salö; Tania Sjöberg Altemani; Magnus Anderberg
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 1.827

9.  Laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty as minimally invasive alternatives to the open approach for the treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction in infants: a multi-institutional comparison of outcomes and learning curves.

Authors:  C Andolfi; A M Lombardo; J Aizen; X Recabal; J P Walker; N S Barashi; F Reed; P J Lopez; D T Wilcox; M S Gundeti
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Anesthetic Implications of Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Mayuko Wakimoto; Marc Michalsky; Olubukola Nafiu; Joseph Tobias
Journal:  Robot Surg       Date:  2021-05-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.