Literature DB >> 35044490

Laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty as minimally invasive alternatives to the open approach for the treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction in infants: a multi-institutional comparison of outcomes and learning curves.

C Andolfi1, A M Lombardo2, J Aizen1, X Recabal3, J P Walker4, N S Barashi1, F Reed3, P J Lopez3, D T Wilcox4, M S Gundeti5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since the development of minimally invasive surgery (MIS), laparoscopic and robotic approaches have been widely adopted. However, little has been published detailing the learning curve of MIS, especially in infants.
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the learning curve of laparoscopic (LP) and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RAL-P) for treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in infants evidenced by number of cases, operative time, success and complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2009 and 2017, we retrospectively reviewed pyeloplasty cases for treatment of UPJO in infants at three academic institutions. The primary outcome was success. Secondary outcomes were UPJO recurrence, complications, and operative time as a surrogate of skill acquisition. Continuous variables were analyzed by t test, Welch-test, and one-way ANOVA. Non-continuous variables were analyzed by Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. Learning curves (LC) were studied by r-to-z transformation and CUSUM.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine OP, 26 LP, and 39 RAL-P had mean operative times (OT) of 106, 121, and 151 min, respectively. LCs showed plateau in OT after 18 and 13 cases for LP and RAL-P, respectively. RAL-P showed a second phase of further improvements after 37 cases. At 16 months follow-up, there were similar rates of success and complications between the three groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite different duration of learning phases, proficiency was achieved in both LP and RAL-P as evidenced by stabilization of operative time and similar success rates and complications to OP. Before and after achievement of proficiency, LP and RAL-P can be safely learned and implemented for treatment of UPJO in infants.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anderson–Hynes open dismembered pyeloplasty; Laparoscopic pyeloplasty; Laparoscopy; Robot-assisted; Robotic surgery; UPJO; Ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35044490     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-03929-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  22 in total

1.  Retrocaval ureter; a case diagnosed pre-operatively and treated successfully by a plastic operation.

Authors:  J C ANDERSON; W HYNES
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1949-09

Review 2.  Robot-assisted and laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Riccardo Autorino; Christopher Eden; Alaa El-Ghoneimi; Giorgio Guazzoni; Nicolòmaria Buffi; Craig A Peters; Robert J Stein; Matthew Gettman
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Transition from open to robotic-assisted pediatric pyeloplasty: a feasibility and outcome study.

Authors:  Sean T O'Brien; Aseem R Shukla
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 1.830

4.  Minimally invasive vs open pyeloplasty in children: the differential effect of procedure volume on operative outcomes.

Authors:  Shyam Sukumar; Orchidee Djahangirian; Akshay Sood; Jesse D Sammon; Briony Varda; Kirsten Janosek-Albright; Abd-El-Rahman Abd-El-Barr; Maxine Sun; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-04-06       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Robot assisted pyeloplasty in the infant-lessons learned.

Authors:  Alexander Kutikov; Michael Nguyen; Thomas Guzzo; Daniel Canter; Pasquale Casale
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Trends in robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in pediatric patients.

Authors:  M Francesca Monn; Clinton D Bahler; Eric B Schneider; Benjamin M Whittam; Rosalia Misseri; Richard C Rink; Chandru P Sundaram
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Computer assisted pyeloplasty in children: the retroperitoneal approach.

Authors:  L H Olsen; T M Jorgensen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Contemporary national comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pediatric pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Dennis B Liu; Chandy Ellimoottil; Andrew S Flum; Jessica T Casey; Edward M Gong
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 1.830

9.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the infant younger than 6 months--is it technically possible?

Authors:  Alexander Kutikov; Matthew Resnick; Pasquale Casale
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Retroperitoneoscopic vs open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.

Authors:  J S Valla; J Breaud; S J Griffin; N Sautot-Vial; F Beretta; R Guana; T Gelas; X Carpentier; R Leculee; H Steyaert
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 1.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.