Literature DB >> 24265266

From unicuspid to quadricuspid: influence of aortic valve morphology on aortic three-dimensional hemodynamics.

Pegah Entezari1, Susanne Schnell, Riti Mahadevia, Chris Malaisrie, Patrick McCarthy, Marla Mendelson, Jeremy Collins, James C Carr, Michael Markl, Alex J Barker.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of aortic valve morphology on aortic hemodynamics between normal tricuspid and congenitally anomalous aortic valves ranging from unicuspid to quadricuspid morphology.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Aortic three-dimensional (3D) blood flow was evaluated by 4D flow MRI in 14 healthy volunteers with normal trileaflet valves and 14 patients with unicuspid (n = 3), bicuspid (n = 9, 3 "true" bicuspid, 3 right-left (RL), 3 right-noncoronary (RN) leaflet fusion, and quadricuspid aortic valves (n = 2). Data analysis included the co-registered visualization of aortic valve morphology with systolic 3D blood flow. The influence of valve morphology on aortic hemodynamics was quantified by valve flow angle.
RESULTS: All RL-bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) were associated with flow jets directed toward the right anterior aortic wall while RN-fusion and unicuspid valves resulted in flow jet patterns toward the right-posterior or posterior wall. Flow angles were clearly influenced by valve morphology (47° ± 10, 28° ± 2, 29° ± 18, 18° ± 12, 15° ± 2 for unicuspid, true BAV, RN-BAV, RL-BAV, quadricuspid valves) and increased compared with controls (7.2° ± 1.1, P = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Altered 3D aortic hemodynamics are impacted by the morphology of congenitally malformed aortic valves.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  4D flow MRI; aortic valve; bicuspid valve; hemodynamics; quadricuspid valve; unicuspid valve

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24265266      PMCID: PMC4864037          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  19 in total

1.  Restricted cusp motion in right-left type of bicuspid aortic valves: a new risk marker for aortopathy.

Authors:  Alessandro Della Corte; Ciro Bancone; Carlo A Conti; Emiliano Votta; Alberto Redaelli; Luca Del Viscovo; Maurizio Cotrufo
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  A classification system for the bicuspid aortic valve from 304 surgical specimens.

Authors:  Hans-H Sievers; Claudia Schmidtke
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  4D flow CMR in assessment of valve-related ascending aortic disease.

Authors:  Michael D Hope; Thomas A Hope; Stephen E S Crook; Karen G Ordovas; Thomas H Urbania; Marc T Alley; Charles B Higgins
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-07

4.  Imaging biomarkers of aortic disease: increased growth rates with eccentric systolic flow.

Authors:  Michael D Hope; Jarrett Wrenn; Monica Sigovan; Elyse Foster; Elaine E Tseng; David Saloner
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Comparison of four-dimensional flow parameters for quantification of flow eccentricity in the ascending aorta.

Authors:  Monica Sigovan; Michael D Hope; Petter Dyverfeldt; David Saloner
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is more diagnostic than 2-dimensional echocardiography in determining the presence of bicuspid aortic valve.

Authors:  S Chris Malaisrie; James Carr; Issam Mikati; Vera Rigolin; Byron K Yip; Brittany Lapin; Patrick M McCarthy
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Bicuspid aortic valve: four-dimensional MR evaluation of ascending aortic systolic flow patterns.

Authors:  Michael D Hope; Thomas A Hope; Alison K Meadows; Karen G Ordovas; Thomas H Urbania; Marcus T Alley; Charles B Higgins
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Incidence and echocardiographic features of congenital unicuspid aortic valve in an adult population.

Authors:  Gian M Novaro; Micky Mishra; Brian P Griffin
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2003-11

9.  Bicuspid aortic valve morphology and interventions in the young.

Authors:  Susan M Fernandes; Paul Khairy; Stephen P Sanders; Steven D Colan
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Aortic dilation in bicuspid aortic valve disease: flow pattern is a major contributor and differs with valve fusion type.

Authors:  Malenka M Bissell; Aaron T Hess; Luca Biasiolli; Steffan J Glaze; Margaret Loudon; Alex Pitcher; Anne Davis; Bernard Prendergast; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker; Stefan Neubauer; Saul G Myerson
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 7.792

View more
  9 in total

1.  Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Are We Able to Improve Hemodynamic Outcome?

Authors:  Pavlo Yevtushenko; Florian Hellmeier; Jan Bruening; Sarah Nordmeyer; Volkmar Falk; Christoph Knosalla; Marcus Kelm; Titus Kuehne; Leonid Goubergrits
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Thoracic aorta 3D hemodynamics in pediatric and young adult patients with bicuspid aortic valve.

Authors:  Bradley D Allen; Pim van Ooij; Alex J Barker; Maria Carr; Maya Gabbour; Susanne Schnell; Kelly B Jarvis; James C Carr; Michael Markl; Cynthia Rigsby; Joshua D Robinson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Eccentric Enlargement of the Aortic Sinuses in Pediatric and Adult Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valves: A Cardiac MRI Study.

Authors:  Heather A Stefek; Kevin H Lin; Cynthia K Rigsby; Hector I Michelena; Pascale Aouad; Alex J Barker; Joshua D Robinson
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  Age-related changes in aortic 3D blood flow velocities and wall shear stress: Implications for the identification of altered hemodynamics in patients with aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Pim van Ooij; Julio Garcia; Wouter V Potters; S Chris Malaisrie; Jeremy D Collins; James C Carr; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Characterization of abnormal wall shear stress using 4D flow MRI in human bicuspid aortopathy.

Authors:  Pim van Ooij; Wouter V Potters; Jeremy Collins; Maria Carr; James Carr; S Chris Malaisrie; Paul W M Fedak; Patrick M McCarthy; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  The American Association for Thoracic Surgery consensus guidelines on bicuspid aortic valve-related aortopathy: Full online-only version.

Authors:  Michael A Borger; Paul W M Fedak; Elizabeth H Stephens; Thomas G Gleason; Evaldas Girdauskas; John S Ikonomidis; Ali Khoynezhad; Samuel C Siu; Subodh Verma; Michael D Hope; Duke E Cameron; Donald F Hammer; Joseph S Coselli; Marc R Moon; Thoralf M Sundt; Alex J Barker; Michael Markl; Alessandro Della Corte; Hector I Michelena; John A Elefteriades
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 7.  Genetic and Developmental Contributors to Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Punashi Dutta; Jeanne F James; Hail Kazik; Joy Lincoln
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 8.  Pathogenic Mechanisms of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Aortopathy.

Authors:  Noor M Yassine; Jasmine T Shahram; Simon C Body
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Computational study of aortic hemodynamics for patients with an abnormal aortic valve: The importance of secondary flow at the ascending aorta inlet.

Authors:  S Pirola; O A Jarral; D P O'Regan; G Asimakopoulos; J R Anderson; J R Pepper; T Athanasiou; X Y Xu
Journal:  APL Bioeng       Date:  2018-03-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.