PURPOSE: To assess the impact of aortic valve morphology on aortic hemodynamics between normal tricuspid and congenitally anomalous aortic valves ranging from unicuspid to quadricuspid morphology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Aortic three-dimensional (3D) blood flow was evaluated by 4D flow MRI in 14 healthy volunteers with normal trileaflet valves and 14 patients with unicuspid (n = 3), bicuspid (n = 9, 3 "true" bicuspid, 3 right-left (RL), 3 right-noncoronary (RN) leaflet fusion, and quadricuspid aortic valves (n = 2). Data analysis included the co-registered visualization of aortic valve morphology with systolic 3D blood flow. The influence of valve morphology on aortic hemodynamics was quantified by valve flow angle. RESULTS: All RL-bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) were associated with flow jets directed toward the right anterior aortic wall while RN-fusion and unicuspid valves resulted in flow jet patterns toward the right-posterior or posterior wall. Flow angles were clearly influenced by valve morphology (47° ± 10, 28° ± 2, 29° ± 18, 18° ± 12, 15° ± 2 for unicuspid, true BAV, RN-BAV, RL-BAV, quadricuspid valves) and increased compared with controls (7.2° ± 1.1, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Altered 3D aortic hemodynamics are impacted by the morphology of congenitally malformed aortic valves.
PURPOSE: To assess the impact of aortic valve morphology on aortic hemodynamics between normal tricuspid and congenitally anomalous aortic valves ranging from unicuspid to quadricuspid morphology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Aortic three-dimensional (3D) blood flow was evaluated by 4D flow MRI in 14 healthy volunteers with normal trileaflet valves and 14 patients with unicuspid (n = 3), bicuspid (n = 9, 3 "true" bicuspid, 3 right-left (RL), 3 right-noncoronary (RN) leaflet fusion, and quadricuspid aortic valves (n = 2). Data analysis included the co-registered visualization of aortic valve morphology with systolic 3D blood flow. The influence of valve morphology on aortic hemodynamics was quantified by valve flow angle. RESULTS: All RL-bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) were associated with flow jets directed toward the right anterior aortic wall while RN-fusion and unicuspid valves resulted in flow jet patterns toward the right-posterior or posterior wall. Flow angles were clearly influenced by valve morphology (47° ± 10, 28° ± 2, 29° ± 18, 18° ± 12, 15° ± 2 for unicuspid, true BAV, RN-BAV, RL-BAV, quadricuspid valves) and increased compared with controls (7.2° ± 1.1, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Altered 3D aortic hemodynamics are impacted by the morphology of congenitally malformed aortic valves.
Authors: Michael D Hope; Thomas A Hope; Stephen E S Crook; Karen G Ordovas; Thomas H Urbania; Marc T Alley; Charles B Higgins Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-07
Authors: Michael D Hope; Jarrett Wrenn; Monica Sigovan; Elyse Foster; Elaine E Tseng; David Saloner Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-07-24 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: S Chris Malaisrie; James Carr; Issam Mikati; Vera Rigolin; Byron K Yip; Brittany Lapin; Patrick M McCarthy Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2011-12-10 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Michael D Hope; Thomas A Hope; Alison K Meadows; Karen G Ordovas; Thomas H Urbania; Marcus T Alley; Charles B Higgins Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Malenka M Bissell; Aaron T Hess; Luca Biasiolli; Steffan J Glaze; Margaret Loudon; Alex Pitcher; Anne Davis; Bernard Prendergast; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker; Stefan Neubauer; Saul G Myerson Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-06-14 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Pavlo Yevtushenko; Florian Hellmeier; Jan Bruening; Sarah Nordmeyer; Volkmar Falk; Christoph Knosalla; Marcus Kelm; Titus Kuehne; Leonid Goubergrits Journal: Biophys J Date: 2019-07-22 Impact factor: 4.033
Authors: Bradley D Allen; Pim van Ooij; Alex J Barker; Maria Carr; Maya Gabbour; Susanne Schnell; Kelly B Jarvis; James C Carr; Michael Markl; Cynthia Rigsby; Joshua D Robinson Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-01-22 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Heather A Stefek; Kevin H Lin; Cynthia K Rigsby; Hector I Michelena; Pascale Aouad; Alex J Barker; Joshua D Robinson Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2019-12-19 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Pim van Ooij; Julio Garcia; Wouter V Potters; S Chris Malaisrie; Jeremy D Collins; James C Carr; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Pim van Ooij; Wouter V Potters; Jeremy Collins; Maria Carr; James Carr; S Chris Malaisrie; Paul W M Fedak; Patrick M McCarthy; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2014-08-14 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Michael A Borger; Paul W M Fedak; Elizabeth H Stephens; Thomas G Gleason; Evaldas Girdauskas; John S Ikonomidis; Ali Khoynezhad; Samuel C Siu; Subodh Verma; Michael D Hope; Duke E Cameron; Donald F Hammer; Joseph S Coselli; Marc R Moon; Thoralf M Sundt; Alex J Barker; Michael Markl; Alessandro Della Corte; Hector I Michelena; John A Elefteriades Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 5.209