Literature DB >> 24262876

Predictors of residual carcinoma or carcinoma-in-situ at hysterectomy following cervical conization with positive margins.

Elena S Diaz1, Chisa Aoyama2, Mary Anne Baquing3, Anna Beavis4, Elvio Silva5, Christine Holschneider6, Ilana Cass7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Identify predictors of residual carcinoma or carcinoma-in-situ (CIS) at hysterectomy following cervical conizations with CIS and positive margins or endocervical curettage (ECC) or microinvasive cervical cancer.
METHODS: Patients with cervical conization with CIS and positive margins, ECC or microinvasive carcinoma who underwent hysterectomy within 6 months of conization were identified. Conization and hysterectomy specimens were re-reviewed to assess volume of disease, ECC and margin status and residual carcinoma. Standard statistical tests were used.
RESULTS: 83 patients were included. 34 (41%) had residual carcinoma in the hysterectomy specimen: 23 CIS, 9 microinvasive and 2 invasive disease. In patients with squamous histology predictors of residual disease included a positive ECC (p=0.04), combined endocervical margin and ECC (69% if both positive, 38% either positive, 11% if both negative, p=0.01) and volume of disease ≥ 50% (p=0.01). In patients with glandular histology no factor predicted residual disease. Type of conization, >2 involved quadrants, and the presence of microinvasion in the conization specimen did not predict residual disease. No patient with squamous histology had >Stage IA1 disease at hysterectomy, whereas 2 (2.4%) with adenocarcinoma had >Stage IA1 disease at hysterectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Residual carcinoma or CIS is present in nearly half of hysterectomies after conization with CIS and positive ECC, margins or microinvasion. Patients with squamous histology may not require repeat conization prior to definitive therapy. No factors predict residual disease with adenocarcinoma. In women with AIS with negative margins and ECC and no microinvasion, it appears reasonable to proceed with simple hysterectomy.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical carcinoma in-situ; Microinvasive cervical cancer; Positive endocervical curettage; Positive margins; Residual disease

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24262876     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.11.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  10 in total

1.  ASO Author Reflections: Is Residual Disease Predictable After Conization in Cervical Cancer?

Authors:  Glauco Baiocchi; Thiago Pereira Diniz; Graziele Bovolim; Louise De Brot
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Predictive Factors for Residual Disease After Conization in Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Glauco Baiocchi; Thiago Pereira Diniz; Graziele Bovolim; Bruna Tirapelli Gonçalves; Lillian Yuri Kumagai; Henrique Mantoan; Carlos Chaves Faloppa; Andrea Paiva Gadelha Guimaraes; Alexandre Andre Balieiro Anastacio da Costa; Levon Badiglian-Filho; Louise De Brot
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Triage for management of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion patients with positive margin by conization: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Yuya Dou; Xiaodan Zhang; Yang Li; Fenfen Wang; Xing Xie; Xinyu Wang
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 4.592

4.  Risk Factors for Residual Disease in Hysterectomy Specimens After Conization in Post-Menopausal Patients with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 3.

Authors:  Xiaoqi Sun; Huifang Lei; Xiaoyan Xie; Guanyu Ruan; Jian An; Pengming Sun
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2020-11-10

5.  Optimal cone size to predict positive surgical margins after cold knife conization (CKC) and the risk factors for residual disease.

Authors:  Murat Öz; Nilüfer Çetinkaya; Elmas Korkmaz; Kerem Doğa Seçkin; Mehmet Mutlu Meydanlı; Tayfun Güngör
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2016-09-01

6.  Necessity for subsequent surgery in women of child-bearing age with positive margins after conization.

Authors:  Xinmei Wang; Juan Xu; Yang Gao; Pengpeng Qu
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.809

7.  Clinical effects of cervical conization with positive margins in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Yukari Nagao; Akira Yokoi; Kosuke Yoshida; Masanori Sumi; Masato Yoshihara; Satoshi Tamauchi; Yoshiki Ikeda; Nobuhisa Yoshikawa; Kimihiro Nishino; Kaoru Niimi; Hiroaki Kajiyama
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Cervical Cancer Recurrence and Patient Survival After Radical Hysterectomy Followed by Either Adjuvant Chemotherapy or Adjuvant Radiotherapy With Optional Concurrent Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Fei Zhang; Yu Fan; Peng Zhang; Jia-Ying Ruan; Yi Mu; Jin-Ke Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Conservative treatment of microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix stage IA1: Defining conization height to an optimal oncological outcome.

Authors:  Caio A Hartman; Joana F Bragança; Maria Salete C Gurgel; Luiz C Zeferino; Liliana A L A Andrade; Julio C Teixeira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Accuracy of conization procedure for predicting pathological parameters of radical hysterectomy in stage Ia2-Ib1 (≤2 cm) cervical cancer.

Authors:  Huimin Bai; Dongyan Cao; Fang Yuan; Huilan Wang; Meizhu Xiao; Jie Chen; Quancai Cui; Keng Shen; Zhenyu Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.