Literature DB >> 27651725

Optimal cone size to predict positive surgical margins after cold knife conization (CKC) and the risk factors for residual disease.

Murat Öz1, Nilüfer Çetinkaya1, Elmas Korkmaz1, Kerem Doğa Seçkin2, Mehmet Mutlu Meydanlı1, Tayfun Güngör3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal cone size to achieve a reliable sensitivity and specificity for clear surgical margins after cold knife conization (CKC).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The medical reports of patients who had high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions, carcinoma in situ, or stage 1A1 microinvasive carcinoma in their CKC specimens between June 2008 and January 2015 were reviewed retrospectively.
RESULTS: In total, 315 women fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The mean age of the patients was 40.7 years. The conization results were microinvasive carcinoma and high-grade squamous lesion (HSIL) for 8 and 307 patients, respectively. Ninety-nine patients had positive surgical margins. Eighty-one patients with positive cone margins underwent the repeat excisional procedure and 35 of them showed residual disease. In the univariate analyses, the patient age, menopausal status, and mean cone height parameters showed statistically significant differences between the patients with positive and negative margins. Also, residual disease was associated with the menopausal status and age of the patients.
CONCLUSION: There is no optimal cone depth that is applicable for all patients. The most important predictors for positive margins are the menopausal status of the patient and that more than two quadrants are involved. However, the menopausal status and age of the patients were still predictors for residual disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cold knife conization; residual disease; surgical margin

Year:  2016        PMID: 27651725      PMCID: PMC5019833          DOI: 10.5152/jtgga.2016.16066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc        ISSN: 1309-0380


  16 in total

1.  Clinicopathologic predictors of incomplete excision after loop electrosurgical excision for cervical preneoplasia.

Authors:  Chumnan Kietpeerakool; Jatupol Srisomboon; Kannaporn Ratchusiri
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2005 Oct-Dec

Review 2.  Management options for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Karl U Petry
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 5.237

3.  Minimal cold knife conization height for high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion treatment.

Authors:  Lúcia Maria Kliemann; Meiri Silva; Marília Reinheimer; Waldemar A Rivoire; Edison Capp; Ricardo Dos Reis
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.435

4.  Adverse obstetrical outcomes after treatment of precancerous cervical lesions: a Belgian multicentre study.

Authors:  C Simoens; F Goffin; P Simon; P Barlow; J Antoine; J-M Foidart; M Arbyn
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Cold-knife conization versus loop excision: histopathologic and clinical results of a randomized trial.

Authors:  F Girardi; M Heydarfadai; F Koroschetz; H Pickel; R Winter
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Appropriate cone dimensions to achieve negative excision margins after large loop excision of transformation zone in the uterine cervix for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Dimitrios Papoutsis; Alexandros Rodolakis; Spiridon Mesogitis; Maria Sotiropoulou; Aris Antsaklis
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  Factors associated with cone margin involvement in CIN patients undergoing conization-equivalent electrosurgical procedure.

Authors:  S Costa; M De Nuzzo; P Terzano; D Santini; P De Simone; A Bovicelli; L Bovicelli; L Bucchi
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  Pregnancy outcome in patients treated with cervical conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Daniel Andía; Fernando Mozo de Rosales; Amparo Villasante; Borja Rivero; Javier Díez; Carlos Pérez
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 3.561

9.  Predictors and clinical significance of the positive cone margin in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III patients.

Authors:  Xiao-guang Sun; Shui-qing Ma; Jin-xia Zhang; Ming Wu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 2.628

10.  Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II-III with endocervical cone margin involvement after cervical loop conization: is there any predictor for residual disease?

Authors:  Chumnan Kietpeerakool; Surapan Khunamornpong; Jatupol Srisomboon; Sumalee Siriaunkgul; Prapaporn Suprasert
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.730

View more
  7 in total

1.  The role of endocervical curettage in detection and treatment of cervical canal lesions.

Authors:  Lin Lang; Ying Jia; Zhaoning Duan; Jin Wu; Ming Luo; Pu Tian
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  Evaluation of Factors Affecting Margin Positivity and Persistent Disease After Leep for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.

Authors:  Anila Tresa Alukal; P Rema; S Suchetha; Dhanya Dinesh; Aleyamma Mathew; K M Jagathnath Krishna; Thara Somanathan; J Sivaranjith
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2021-03-12

3.  The Appropriate of Cone Depth in Loop Electrical Excision Procedure (LEEP) for Negative Pathological Margin from High Grade Precancerous Lesion of Cervix, Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Noppames Srijarusith; Nopporn Rodpenpear
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2022-02-01

4.  Excisions of severe cervical dysplasia: Are there mandatory diameters of the cone that need to be considered?

Authors:  Daniel A Beyer; Achim Rody; Natalie Schmidt; Christoph Cirkel; Kay Neumann
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2017-12-15

Review 5.  Diagnosis and Management of Adenocarcinoma in Situ: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology Evidence-Based Review and Recommendations.

Authors:  Deanna Teoh; Fernanda Musa; Ritu Salani; Warner Huh; Edward Jimenez
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 7.623

6.  Construction and Evaluation of a Clinical Prediction Scoring System for Positive Cervical Margins Under Colposcopy.

Authors:  Meiling Zhu; Mingyue Yu; Zhengzheng Chen; Weidong Zhao
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-02-28

7.  TWENTY-YEAR EXPERIENCE WITH LARGE LOOP EXCISION OF THE TRANSFORMATION ZONE AT SESTRE MILOSRDNICE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CENTRE.

Authors:  Dražan Butorac; Bernarda Škrtić; Marijo Čukelj; Krunoslav Kuna; Ivka Djaković
Journal:  Acta Clin Croat       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 0.780

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.