Literature DB >> 34283862

Conservative treatment of microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix stage IA1: Defining conization height to an optimal oncological outcome.

Caio A Hartman1, Joana F Bragança1, Maria Salete C Gurgel1, Luiz C Zeferino1, Liliana A L A Andrade2, Julio C Teixeira1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This paper searches an ideal cone height for stage definition and safe treatment of cervical microinvasive squamous carcinoma stage IA1 (MIC IA1), avoiding excessive cervix resection, favoring a future pregnancy.
METHODS: A retrospective study was performed involving 562 women with MIC IA1, from 1985 to 2013, evaluating cone margin involvement, depth of stromal invasion, lymph vascular invasion, conization height, and residual uterine disease (RD). High-grade squamous lesions or worse detection was considered recurrence. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed, including age, conization technique (CKC, cold-knife, or ETZ, excision of transformation zone), and pathological results. Conization height to provide negative margins and the risk of residual disease were analyzed.
RESULTS: Conization was indicated by biopsy CIN2/3 in 293 cases. Definitive treatments were hysterectomy (69.8%), CKC (20.5%), and ETZ (9.7%). Recurrence rate was 5.5%, more frequent in older women (p = 0.030), and less frequent in the hysterectomy group (p = 0.023). Age ≥40 years, ETZ and conization height are independent risk factors for margin involvement. For ages <40 years, 10 mm cone height was associated with 68.6% Negative Predictive Value (NPV) for positive margins, while for 15 mm and 25 mm, the NPV was 75.8% and 96.2%, respectively. With negative margins, the NPV for RD varied from 85.7-92.3% for up to 24 mm cone height and 100% from 25 mm.
CONCLUSION: Conization 10 mm height for women <40 years provided adequate staging for almost 70%, with 10% of RD and few recurrences. A personalized cone height and staging associated with conservative treatment are recommended.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34283862     DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  22 in total

1.  Cancer of the cervix uteri.

Authors:  Neerja Bhatla; Daisuke Aoki; Daya Nand Sharma; Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  Microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix: histological findings on cone specimens related to residual neoplasia on hysterectomy.

Authors:  M S Gurgel; A J Bedone; L A Andrade; K Panetta
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer.

Authors:  M S Piver; F Rutledge; J P Smith
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Predictive factors for residual disease in hysterectomy specimens after conization in early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  A S M Wong; W H Li; T H Cheung
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Screening for cervical cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  The appropriate cone depth to avoid endocervical margin involvement is dependent on age and disease severity.

Authors:  Hyo Sook Bae; Ye Won Chung; Tak Kim; Kyu Wan Lee; Jae Yun Song
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 7.  Large loop excision of the transformation zone.

Authors:  W Prendiville
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.190

8.  Analysis of treatment modalities and prognosis on microinvasive cervical cancer: a 10-year cohort study in China.

Authors:  Qiuhong Qian; Jiaxin Yang; Dongyan Cao; Yan You; Jie Chen; Keng Shen
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.401

9.  Pregnancy Outcomes after Treatment for Cervical Cancer Precursor Lesions: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Sheila Weinmann; Allison Naleway; Geeta Swamy; Girishanthy Krishnarajah; Bhakti Arondekar; Jovelle Fernandez; Evan Myers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maria Kyrgiou; Antonios Athanasiou; Maria Paraskevaidi; Anita Mitra; Ilkka Kalliala; Pierre Martin-Hirsch; Marc Arbyn; Phillip Bennett; Evangelos Paraskevaidis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-07-28
View more
  1 in total

1.  The value of the endocervical margin status in LEEP: analysis of 610 cases.

Authors:  Camila Castelhano Mirandez; Juliana Yoko Yoneda; Larissa Nascimento Gertrudes; Carla Fabrine Carvalho; Sophie Derchain; Julio Cesar Teixeira; Diama Bhadra Vale
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 2.493

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.