Literature DB >> 33566245

Predictive Factors for Residual Disease After Conization in Cervical Cancer.

Glauco Baiocchi1, Thiago Pereira Diniz2, Graziele Bovolim3, Bruna Tirapelli Gonçalves2, Lillian Yuri Kumagai2, Henrique Mantoan2, Carlos Chaves Faloppa2, Andrea Paiva Gadelha Guimaraes4, Alexandre Andre Balieiro Anastacio da Costa4, Levon Badiglian-Filho2, Louise De Brot3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate predictive factors for the presence of residual disease after conization followed by definitive surgery in cervical cancer, and suggest a margin distance threshold that could predict residual disease.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a series of 42 patients with early-stage cervical cancer who underwent primary conization before definitive surgical treatment from March 2009 to May 2020. All conization specimens were reviewed for endocervical, ectocervical, and radial margins. Cases with residual disease in magnetic resonance imaging before definitive surgery were excluded.
RESULTS: Thirty-three (78.6%) patients underwent hysterectomies and 9 (21.4%) trachelectomies ± lymph node staging. Twelve (28.6%) cases were stage IA1, 5 (11.8%) cases were stage IA2, 13 (31%) cases were stage IB1, 11 (26.2%) cases were stage IB2, and 1 (2.4%) case was stage IIIC1 [International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2019]. We found residual disease in 17 (40.4%) surgical specimens. Of the 20 patients with negative margins, there were still 3 (15%) cases with residual disease. Conversely, residual disease was identified in 14 (63.6%) of the 22 patients with positive cone margins (p = 0.001). Tumor size [odds ratio (OR) 1.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.33] and positive endocervical margin status (OR 33.6, 95% CI 3.85-293.3) were related to a higher risk of residual disease in multivariate analysis. Notably, all patients with tumors larger than 2 cm had residual disease, in contrast to 29.4% in lesions up to 2 cm (p = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: We found that tumor size and positive margin were predictive factors for residual disease. We could not suggest a reliable minimum margin distance threshold that could predict residual disease.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33566245     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09656-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  22 in total

Review 1.  Fertility results and pregnancy outcomes after conservative treatment of cervical cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Enrica Bentivegna; Amandine Maulard; Patricia Pautier; Cyrus Chargari; Sebastien Gouy; Philippe Morice
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Prediction of residual neoplasia based on histopathology and margin status of conization specimens.

Authors:  D Y Chang; W F Cheng; P L Torng; R J Chen; S C Huang
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Risk of residual invasive disease in women with microinvasive squamous cancer in a conization specimen.

Authors:  L D Roman; J C Felix; L I Muderspach; A Agahjanian; D Qian; C P Morrow
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Is parametrectomy always necessary in early-stage cervical cancer?

Authors:  Glauco Baiocchi; Louise de Brot; Carlos Chaves Faloppa; Henrique Mantoan; Matheus Rodrigues Duque; Levon Badiglian-Filho; Alexandre Andre Balieiro Anastacio da Costa; Lillian Yuri Kumagai
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 5.  Fertility-sparing options for early stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Lilian T Gien; Allan Covens
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 6.  Management of low-risk early-stage cervical cancer: should conization, simple trachelectomy, or simple hysterectomy replace radical surgery as the new standard of care?

Authors:  Pedro T Ramirez; Rene Pareja; Gabriel J Rendón; Carlos Millan; Michael Frumovitz; Kathleen M Schmeler
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Preoperative pathologic findings associated with residual disease at radical hysterectomy in women with stage IA2 cervical cancer.

Authors:  Anuj Suri; Michael Frumovitz; Michael R Milam; Ricardo dos Reis; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 8.  Oncological outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for cervical cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Enrica Bentivegna; Sebastien Gouy; Amandine Maulard; Cyrus Chargari; Alexandra Leary; Philippe Morice
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Predictors of residual carcinoma or carcinoma-in-situ at hysterectomy following cervical conization with positive margins.

Authors:  Elena S Diaz; Chisa Aoyama; Mary Anne Baquing; Anna Beavis; Elvio Silva; Christine Holschneider; Ilana Cass
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 10.  Simple conization and pelvic lymphadenectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A retrospective analysis and review of the literature.

Authors:  Xiaoqi Li; Lingfang Xia; Xiaojun Chen; Yi Fu; Xiaohua Wu
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 5.482

View more
  1 in total

1.  Clinical effects of cervical conization with positive margins in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Yukari Nagao; Akira Yokoi; Kosuke Yoshida; Masanori Sumi; Masato Yoshihara; Satoshi Tamauchi; Yoshiki Ikeda; Nobuhisa Yoshikawa; Kimihiro Nishino; Kaoru Niimi; Hiroaki Kajiyama
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.