Literature DB >> 24262833

Neanderthal and Denisovan retroviruses in modern humans.

Emanuele Marchi1, Alex Kanapin2, Matthew Byott3, Gkikas Magiorkinis4, Robert Belshaw5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24262833      PMCID: PMC3923971          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


× No keyword cloud information.

Main Text

The genomes of extinct human groups (archaic hominins), such as Neanderthals, are now available with high throughput sequencing technology, which can produce millions of short (∼100 base) sequences called reads from fossil bone or teeth. An analysis of a Neanderthal and a Denisovan genome identified many reads that contained sequences of viral origin, similar to known integrations of retroviruses into the germline of modern humans [1]. Such so-called endogenous retroviruses (or ERVs) are common, making up ∼5% of our genome. Some of the reads spanned the integration site of an ERV, called here a locus, and thus were part viral DNA and part archaic hominin DNA (Figure 1). In some cases, the authors [1] did not find an ERV at the corresponding coordinate in the human genome reference sequence. Instead they found the pre-integration site, which is the sequence that existed before the virus inserted a copy of itself into the chromosome. All of these loci belonged to one ERV lineage (family), called HERVK(HML2) or HERVK, which is the only lineage that has continued to replicate within humans in the last few million years [2]. They concluded that these retroviruses had infected the germline of the archaic hominins either after their divergence from modern humans (∼400,000 years ago) or immediately before divergence (with the integration and pre-integration sites then segregating differently in the lineages). However, while searching many new genome sequences of modern humans for ERVs, we have found most of these loci. For example, of the eight Denisovan loci for which Agoni et al. [1] were able to give precise genome coordinates, at least seven exist in modern humans. We have found six in an analysis of 67 cancer patient genomes (Figure 1), and examination of another study of 43 such genomes [3] shows all seven to be present (Supplemental information). One is K113 (19p12b), which is well-described and has a frequency of 16% in modern humans [2]. The four reported Denisovan loci lacking coordinates are within repetitive or unassembled regions of the genome, and we can neither confirm nor refute their presence in the modern human population: e.g. two loci are in transposable elements called Alu’s, of which there are ∼1,000,000 copies in the human genome (making up ∼10% of the human genome sequence). When an ERV integrates into another transposable element, finding this ERV locus can be a formidable computational challenge because there are many paralogous copies of the integration site. Two additional loci were reported from the Neanderthal fossil, and we have found one of these.
Figure 1

ERV loci absent from the human reference genome but present in both archaic hominins and modern humans.

For each Agoni et al. [1] locus that we recovered in modern humans, the top sequence with black background shows the corresponding pre-integration region in the human reference sequence (hg19) and below are the reads from both the archaic hominins (with the viral regions in blue) and modern humans (viral regions in red). ‘De’ = Denisovan, ‘Ne’ = Neanderthal. In most cases there are reads spanning both upstream and downstream boundaries of the ERV, with the characteristic six base Target Site Duplication (TSD) of the host genome between them (see also Figure S1; only a small sample of the available reads from modern humans is shown). An asterisk shows the first base of the ERV, which in five of the seven instances represented here has integrated in reverse orientation. Coordinates taken from the UCSC Genome Browser at http://genome.ucsc.edu/ (Feb. 2009 (GRCh37/hg19) assembly). Both we and Agoni et al. [1] found the same A/G substitution in the TSD of HERV-K-De3.

ERV loci absent from the human reference genome but present in both archaic hominins and modern humans. For each Agoni et al. [1] locus that we recovered in modern humans, the top sequence with black background shows the corresponding pre-integration region in the human reference sequence (hg19) and below are the reads from both the archaic hominins (with the viral regions in blue) and modern humans (viral regions in red). ‘De’ = Denisovan, ‘Ne’ = Neanderthal. In most cases there are reads spanning both upstream and downstream boundaries of the ERV, with the characteristic six base Target Site Duplication (TSD) of the host genome between them (see also Figure S1; only a small sample of the available reads from modern humans is shown). An asterisk shows the first base of the ERV, which in five of the seven instances represented here has integrated in reverse orientation. Coordinates taken from the UCSC Genome Browser at http://genome.ucsc.edu/ (Feb. 2009 (GRCh37/hg19) assembly). Both we and Agoni et al. [1] found the same A/G substitution in the TSD of HERV-K-De3. It is unlikely that these ERV loci in the archaic hominins are contaminants from modern human DNA. Average coverage of the Denisovan genome was only about twofold and the contamination rate among the reads was estimated using several approaches to have been less than 1% [4]. We believe that the explanation lies in fundamental population genetics. With the exception of co-opted ERV loci such as syncytins [5], which could increase in frequency due to positive selection, we assume ERV loci become common by genetic drift, and the average time for a neutral allele to go to fixation is 4Ne generations (where Ne is the effective population size). Given estimates of long-term human generation time and population size [6], this is ∼800,000 years. The population divergence of modern humans from the Denisovan/Neanderthal lineage is more recent, between 170,000 and 700,000 years according to a more recent — and much deeper —sequencing of the above Denisovan fossil [7], so many loci will have persisted at fluctuating frequencies in all three lineages. As well as showing how differences in loci between one genome and another must be interpreted cautiously, our finding illustrates how single genomes, whether the human reference or one from an archaic hominin fossil, are likely to only contain those ERV loci that after almost a million years have drifted to high frequency. These old loci give us only a limited insight into the processes that created them, e.g. they will have accrued multiple inactivating mutations during this time. In contrast, loci that have integrated recently are more likely to produce proteins and might even be replicating. Such loci are interesting, perhaps most importantly because they are more likely to be pathogenic. The long-running debate over whether or not ERVs cause disease in humans has been handicapped by our poor knowledge of ERV polymorphism. Characterising individual loci is necessary to test ERV involvement in disease 8, 9, and will aid the potential exploitation of ERV proteins as cancer and HIV immunotherapy targets [10]. ERVs in fossil hominins also improve our understanding of both ERV and human evolution. When the ERV loci in modern humans have been reasonably well-sampled, fossil loci will help us build a robust mathematical model of ERV proliferation. Then, because ERV loci make easily detectable and irreversible genetic markers (the common mechanism called ‘recombinational deletion’ leaves a relict structure called a solo-LTR [9]), they might help us in the measurement of divergence dates and population sizes for these archaic hominins.
  10 in total

1.  Neandertal and Denisovan retroviruses.

Authors:  Lorenzo Agoni; Aaron Golden; Chandan Guha; Jack Lenz
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  A high-coverage genome sequence from an archaic Denisovan individual.

Authors:  Matthias Meyer; Martin Kircher; Marie-Theres Gansauge; Heng Li; Fernando Racimo; Swapan Mallick; Joshua G Schraiber; Flora Jay; Kay Prüfer; Cesare de Filippo; Peter H Sudmant; Can Alkan; Qiaomei Fu; Ron Do; Nadin Rohland; Arti Tandon; Michael Siebauer; Richard E Green; Katarzyna Bryc; Adrian W Briggs; Udo Stenzel; Jesse Dabney; Jay Shendure; Jacob Kitzman; Michael F Hammer; Michael V Shunkov; Anatoli P Derevianko; Nick Patterson; Aida M Andrés; Evan E Eichler; Montgomery Slatkin; David Reich; Janet Kelso; Svante Pääbo
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Landscape of somatic retrotransposition in human cancers.

Authors:  Eunjung Lee; Rebecca Iskow; Lixing Yang; Omer Gokcumen; Psalm Haseley; Lovelace J Luquette; Jens G Lohr; Christopher C Harris; Li Ding; Richard K Wilson; David A Wheeler; Richard A Gibbs; Raju Kucherlapati; Charles Lee; Peter V Kharchenko; Peter J Park
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Immunotherapeutic potential of anti-human endogenous retrovirus-K envelope protein antibodies in targeting breast tumors.

Authors:  Feng Wang-Johanning; Kiera Rycaj; Joshua B Plummer; Ming Li; Bingnan Yin; Katherine Frerich; Jeremy G Garza; Jianjun Shen; Kevin Lin; Peisha Yan; Sharon A Glynn; Tiffany H Dorsey; Kelly K Hunt; Stefan Ambs; Gary L Johanning
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Genetic history of an archaic hominin group from Denisova Cave in Siberia.

Authors:  David Reich; Richard E Green; Martin Kircher; Johannes Krause; Nick Patterson; Eric Y Durand; Bence Viola; Adrian W Briggs; Udo Stenzel; Philip L F Johnson; Tomislav Maricic; Jeffrey M Good; Tomas Marques-Bonet; Can Alkan; Qiaomei Fu; Swapan Mallick; Heng Li; Matthias Meyer; Evan E Eichler; Mark Stoneking; Michael Richards; Sahra Talamo; Michael V Shunkov; Anatoli P Derevianko; Jean-Jacques Hublin; Janet Kelso; Montgomery Slatkin; Svante Pääbo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Genomewide screening reveals high levels of insertional polymorphism in the human endogenous retrovirus family HERV-K(HML2): implications for present-day activity.

Authors:  Robert Belshaw; Anna L A Dawson; John Woolven-Allen; Joanna Redding; Austin Burt; Michael Tristem
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 7.  From ancestral infectious retroviruses to bona fide cellular genes: role of the captured syncytins in placentation.

Authors:  A Dupressoir; C Lavialle; T Heidmann
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Identification, characterization, and comparative genomic distribution of the HERV-K (HML-2) group of human endogenous retroviruses.

Authors:  Ravi P Subramanian; Julia H Wildschutte; Crystal Russo; John M Coffin
Journal:  Retrovirology       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 4.602

Review 9.  'There and back again': revisiting the pathophysiological roles of human endogenous retroviruses in the post-genomic era.

Authors:  Gkikas Magiorkinis; Robert Belshaw; Aris Katzourakis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 10.  Are human endogenous retroviruses pathogenic? An approach to testing the hypothesis.

Authors:  George R Young; Jonathan P Stoye; George Kassiotis
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 4.345

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  Genome-wide amplification of proviral sequences reveals new polymorphic HERV-K(HML-2) proviruses in humans and chimpanzees that are absent from genome assemblies.

Authors:  Catriona M Macfarlane; Richard M Badge
Journal:  Retrovirology       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 4.602

Review 2.  Archaeogenetics in evolutionary medicine.

Authors:  Abigail Bouwman; Frank Rühli
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  Unfixed endogenous retroviral insertions in the human population.

Authors:  Emanuele Marchi; Alex Kanapin; Gkikas Magiorkinis; Robert Belshaw
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Novel Denisovan and Neanderthal retroviruses.

Authors:  Adam Lee; Derek Huntley; Pakorn Aiewsakun; Ravinder K Kanda; Claire Lynn; Michael Tristem
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 5.  Roles for retrotransposon insertions in human disease.

Authors:  Dustin C Hancks; Haig H Kazazian
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2016-05-06

6.  Classification and characterization of human endogenous retroviruses; mosaic forms are common.

Authors:  Laura Vargiu; Patricia Rodriguez-Tomé; Göran O Sperber; Marta Cadeddu; Nicole Grandi; Vidar Blikstad; Enzo Tramontano; Jonas Blomberg
Journal:  Retrovirology       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 4.602

7.  Insertionally polymorphic sites of human endogenous retrovirus-K (HML-2) with long target site duplications.

Authors:  Tomoaki Kahyo; Hidetaka Yamada; Hong Tao; Nobuya Kurabe; Haruhiko Sugimura
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Motifome comparison between modern human, Neanderthal and Denisovan.

Authors:  Matyas F Cserhati; Mary-Ellen Mooter; Lauren Peterson; Benjamin Wicks; Peng Xiao; Mark Pauley; Chittibabu Guda
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  BreakAlign: a Perl program to align chimaeric (split) genomic NGS reads and allow visual confirmation of novel retroviral integrations.

Authors:  Emanuele Marchi; Mathew Jones; Paul Klenerman; John Frater; Gkikas Magiorkinis; Robert Belshaw
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.