Literature DB >> 24261612

A study of prospective surveillance for inhibitors among persons with haemophilia in the United States.

J M Soucie1, C H Miller, F M Kelly, A B Payne, M Creary, P L Bockenstedt, C L Kempton, M J Manco-Johnson, A T Neff.   

Abstract

Inhibitors are a rare but serious complication of treatment of patients with haemophilia. Phase III clinical trials enrol too few patients to adequately assess new product inhibitor risk. This project explores the feasibility of using a public health surveillance system to conduct national surveillance for inhibitors. Staff at 17 U.S. haemophilia treatment centres (HTC) enrolled patients with haemophilia A and B into this prospective study. HTC staff provided detailed historic data on product use and inhibitors at baseline, and postenrolment patients provided monthly detailed infusion logs. A central laboratory performed inhibitor tests on blood specimens that were collected at baseline, annually, prior to any planned product switch or when clinically indicated. The central laboratory also performed genotyping of all enrolled patients. From January 2006 through June 2012, 1163 patients were enrolled and followed up for 3329 person-years. A total of 3048 inhibitor tests were performed and 23 new factor VIII inhibitors were identified, 61% of which were not clinically apparent. Infusion logs were submitted for 113,205 exposure days. Genotyping revealed 431 distinct mutations causing haemophilia, 151 of which had not previously been reported elsewhere in the world. This study provided critical information about the practical issues that must be addressed to successfully implement national inhibitor surveillance. Centralized testing with routine monitoring and confirmation of locally identified inhibitors will provide valid and representative data with which to evaluate inhibitor incidence and prevalence, monitor trends in occurrence rates and identify potential inhibitor outbreaks associated with products.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  haemophilia; haemophilia inhibitor; surveillance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24261612      PMCID: PMC4519821          DOI: 10.1111/hae.12302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haemophilia        ISSN: 1351-8216            Impact factor:   4.287


  15 in total

1.  Postmarketing surveillance and adverse drug reactions: current perspectives and future needs.

Authors:  T Brewer; G A Colditz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-03-03       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The principal results of the International Immune Tolerance Study: a randomized dose comparison.

Authors:  Charles R M Hay; Donna M DiMichele
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  The universal data collection surveillance system for rare bleeding disorders.

Authors:  J Michael Soucie; Sally McAlister; Ann McClellan; Meredith Oakley; Ying Su
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 4.  Limitations and strengths of spontaneous reports data.

Authors:  S A Goldman
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.393

5.  Validation of Nijmegen-Bethesda assay modifications to allow inhibitor measurement during replacement therapy and facilitate inhibitor surveillance.

Authors:  C H Miller; S J Platt; A S Rice; F Kelly; J M Soucie
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.824

6.  Health care expenditures for Medicaid-covered males with haemophilia in the United States, 2008.

Authors:  S Guh; S D Grosse; S McAlister; C M Kessler; J M Soucie
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 4.287

7.  Home-based factor infusion therapy and hospitalization for bleeding complications among males with haemophilia.

Authors:  J M Soucie; J Symons; B Evatt; D Brettler; H Huszti; J Linden
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.287

8.  Healthcare expenditures for males with haemophilia and employer-sponsored insurance in the United States, 2008.

Authors:  S Guh; S D Grosse; S McAlister; C M Kessler; J M Soucie
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 4.287

9.  Incidence of inhibitors in a cohort of 838 males with hemophilia A previously treated with factor VIII concentrates.

Authors:  C L Kempton; J M Soucie; T C Abshire
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 5.824

10.  Assessing the costs for clinical care of patients with high-responding factor VIII and IX inhibitors.

Authors:  M Ullman; W K Hoots
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.287

View more
  20 in total

1.  Evaluation of von Willebrand factor phenotypes and genotypes in Hemophilia A patients with and without identified F8 mutations.

Authors:  B Boylan; A S Rice; C De Staercke; M E Eyster; H M Yaish; C M Knoll; C J Bean; C H Miller
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 5.824

2.  Improving the performance of factor VIII inhibitor tests in hemophilia A.

Authors:  Connie H Miller
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 3.944

3.  National surveillance for hemophilia inhibitors in the United States: Summary report of an expert meeting.

Authors:  J Michael Soucie; Connie H Miller; Fiona M Kelly; Diane Aschman; Donna DiMichele; Barbara A Konkle; Roshni Kulkarni; Paul E Monahan
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 10.047

4.  Characteristics of hemophilia patients with factor VIII inhibitors detected by prospective screening.

Authors:  Connie H Miller; Anne S Rice; Brian Boylan; Amanda B Payne; Fiona M Kelly; Miguel A Escobar; Joan Gill; Cindy Leissinger; J Michael Soucie
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 10.047

5.  Achievements, challenges and unmet needs for haemophilia patients with inhibitors: Report from a symposium in Paris, France on 20 November 2014.

Authors:  Y Dargaud; A Pavlova; S Lacroix-Desmazes; K Fischer; M Soucie; S Claeyssens; D W Scott; R d'Oiron; G Lavigne-Lissalde; G Kenet; C Escuriola Ettingshausen; A Borel-Derlon; T Lambert; G Pasta; C Négrier
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.287

6.  Effects of pre-analytical heat treatment in factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitor assays on FVIII antibody levels.

Authors:  B Boylan; C H Miller
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 4.287

7.  Characterization of the anti-factor VIII immunoglobulin profile in patients with hemophilia A by use of a fluorescence-based immunoassay.

Authors:  B Boylan; A S Rice; A L Dunn; M D Tarantino; D B Brettler; J C Barrett; C H Miller
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 5.824

8.  Limit of detection and threshold for positivity of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention assay for factor VIII inhibitors.

Authors:  C H Miller; B Boylan; A D Shapiro; S R Lentz; B M Wicklund
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 5.824

9.  Survey of the anti-factor IX immunoglobulin profiles in patients with hemophilia B using a fluorescence-based immunoassay.

Authors:  B Boylan; A S Rice; A T Neff; M J Manco-Johnson; C L Kempton; C H Miller
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 5.824

10.  Comparison of clot-based, chromogenic and fluorescence assays for measurement of factor VIII inhibitors in the US Hemophilia Inhibitor Research Study.

Authors:  C H Miller; A S Rice; B Boylan; A D Shapiro; S R Lentz; B M Wicklund; F M Kelly; J M Soucie
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.824

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.