Literature DB >> 22435927

Validation of Nijmegen-Bethesda assay modifications to allow inhibitor measurement during replacement therapy and facilitate inhibitor surveillance.

C H Miller1, S J Platt, A S Rice, F Kelly, J M Soucie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As part of a pilot U.S. inhibitor surveillance project initiated at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in 2006, a centralized inhibitor measurement was instituted.
OBJECTIVE: To validate a modified method for inhibitor measurement suitable for surveillance of treated and untreated patients. METHODS/
RESULTS: In all, 710 subjects with hemophilia A were enrolled; 122 had a history of inhibitor (HI). Nijmegen-Bethesda assay (NBA) results on 50 split specimens shipped on cold packs and frozen were equivalent (r=0.998). Because 55% of 228 initial specimens had factor (F)VIII activity (VIII:C) present, a heat treatment step was added. Heating specimens to 56°C for 30 min and centrifuging removed FVIII, as demonstrated by a reduction of VIII:C and FVIII antigen to <1 U dL(-1) in recently treated patients. Among specimens inhibitor-negative before heating, one of 159 with negative HI and five of 30 with positive HI rose to ≥ 0.5 Nijmegen-Bethesda units (NBU) after heating. Correlation of heated and unheated inhibitor-positive specimens was 0.94 (P=0.0001). The modified method had a coefficient of variation (CV) for a 1 NBU positive control of 10.3% and for the negative control of 9.8%. Based on results on 710 enrollment specimens, a positive CDC inhibitor was defined as ≥ 0.5 NBU. Results were similar when 643 post-enrollment specimens were included. Of 160 enrolled hemophilia B patients, two had HI. All others had NBU ≤ 0.2 at enrollment.
CONCLUSION: The CDC experience demonstrates that this modified NBA can be standardized to be within acceptable limits for clinical tests and can be used for national surveillance.
© 2012 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22435927      PMCID: PMC4477703          DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04705.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 1538-7836            Impact factor:   5.824


  13 in total

1.  Inter-laboratory variability of the measurement of low titer factor VIII:C inhibitor in haemophiliacs: improvement by the Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay and the use of common lyophilized plasmas.

Authors:  G Reber; M H Aurousseau; M Dreyfus; B Delahousse; C Caron; M C Trzeciack; M F Aillaud; M H Horellou; Y Laurian; P Si
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.287

2.  A 4% solution of bovine serum albumin may be used in place of factor VIII:C deficient plasma in the control sample in the Nijmegen Modification of the Bethesda factor VIII:C inhibitor assay.

Authors:  Bert Verbruggen; Waander van Heerde; Irena Novákovà; David Lillicrap; Alan Giles
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.249

3.  A detailed comparison of the performance of the standard versus the Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay in detecting factor VIII:C inhibitors in the haemophilia A population of Canada. Association of Hemophilia Centre Directors of Canada. Factor VIII/IX Subcommittee of Scientific and Standardization Committee of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Authors:  A R Giles; B Verbruggen; G E Rivard; J Teitel; I Walker
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.249

4.  F8 and F9 mutations in US haemophilia patients: correlation with history of inhibitor and race/ethnicity.

Authors:  C H Miller; J Benson; D Ellingsen; J Driggers; A Payne; F M Kelly; J M Soucie; W Craig Hooper
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 4.287

5.  The Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay for factor VIII:C inhibitors: improved specificity and reliability.

Authors:  B Verbruggen; I Novakova; H Wessels; J Boezeman; M van den Berg; E Mauser-Bunschoten
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 6.  Improvements in factor VIII inhibitor detection: From Bethesda to Nijmegen.

Authors:  Bert Verbruggen; Waander L van Heerde; Britta A P Laros-van Gorkom
Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 4.180

Review 7.  Laboratory identification of factor inhibitors: the perspective of a large tertiary hemophilia center.

Authors:  Geoffrey Kershaw; Dayani Jayakodi; Scott Dunkley
Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 4.180

8.  The between-laboratory variation of factor VIII inhibitor testing: the experience of the external quality assessment program of the ECAT foundation.

Authors:  Piet Meijer; Bert Verbruggen
Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 4.180

9.  Anti-factor VIII antibodies of hemophiliac patients are frequently directed towards nonfunctional determinants and do not exhibit isotypic restriction.

Authors:  J G Gilles; J Arnout; J Vermylen; J M Saint-Remy
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1993-10-15       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Interlaboratory variation in factor VIII:C inhibitor assay results is sufficient to influence patient management: data from the UK national quality external assessment scheme for blood coagulation.

Authors:  Steve Kitchen; Ian Jennings; F Eric Preston; Dianne P Kitchen; Tim A L Woods; Isobel D Walker
Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 4.180

View more
  26 in total

1.  Combined anti-CD20 and mTOR inhibition with factor VIII for immune tolerance induction in hemophilia A patients with refractory inhibitors.

Authors:  Bhavya S Doshi; Leslie J Raffini; Lindsey A George
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 5.824

2.  Improving the performance of factor VIII inhibitor tests in hemophilia A.

Authors:  Connie H Miller
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 3.944

3.  National surveillance for hemophilia inhibitors in the United States: Summary report of an expert meeting.

Authors:  J Michael Soucie; Connie H Miller; Fiona M Kelly; Diane Aschman; Donna DiMichele; Barbara A Konkle; Roshni Kulkarni; Paul E Monahan
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 10.047

4.  Reagent substitutions in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Nijmegen-Bethesda assay for factor VIII inhibitors.

Authors:  C H Miller; A B Payne; J Driggers; D Ellingsen; B Boylan; C J Bean
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 4.287

5.  Characteristics of hemophilia patients with factor VIII inhibitors detected by prospective screening.

Authors:  Connie H Miller; Anne S Rice; Brian Boylan; Amanda B Payne; Fiona M Kelly; Miguel A Escobar; Joan Gill; Cindy Leissinger; J Michael Soucie
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 10.047

6.  Effects of pre-analytical heat treatment in factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitor assays on FVIII antibody levels.

Authors:  B Boylan; C H Miller
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 4.287

7.  Reagent substitution in the chromogenic Bethesda assay for factor VIII inhibitors.

Authors:  Amanda B Payne; Connie H Miller; Dorothy Ellingsen; Jennifer Driggers; Brian Boylan; Christopher J Bean
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 4.287

Review 8.  Laboratory testing for factor VIII and IX inhibitors in haemophilia: A review.

Authors:  C H Miller
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.287

9.  Survey of the anti-factor IX immunoglobulin profiles in patients with hemophilia B using a fluorescence-based immunoassay.

Authors:  B Boylan; A S Rice; A T Neff; M J Manco-Johnson; C L Kempton; C H Miller
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 5.824

10.  Comparison of clot-based, chromogenic and fluorescence assays for measurement of factor VIII inhibitors in the US Hemophilia Inhibitor Research Study.

Authors:  C H Miller; A S Rice; B Boylan; A D Shapiro; S R Lentz; B M Wicklund; F M Kelly; J M Soucie
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.824

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.