C H Miller1, S J Platt, A S Rice, F Kelly, J M Soucie. 1. Division of Blood Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. cmiller2@cdc.gov
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As part of a pilot U.S. inhibitor surveillance project initiated at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in 2006, a centralized inhibitor measurement was instituted. OBJECTIVE: To validate a modified method for inhibitor measurement suitable for surveillance of treated and untreated patients. METHODS/ RESULTS: In all, 710 subjects with hemophilia A were enrolled; 122 had a history of inhibitor (HI). Nijmegen-Bethesda assay (NBA) results on 50 split specimens shipped on cold packs and frozen were equivalent (r=0.998). Because 55% of 228 initial specimens had factor (F)VIII activity (VIII:C) present, a heat treatment step was added. Heating specimens to 56°C for 30 min and centrifuging removed FVIII, as demonstrated by a reduction of VIII:C and FVIII antigen to <1 U dL(-1) in recently treated patients. Among specimens inhibitor-negative before heating, one of 159 with negative HI and five of 30 with positive HI rose to ≥ 0.5 Nijmegen-Bethesda units (NBU) after heating. Correlation of heated and unheated inhibitor-positive specimens was 0.94 (P=0.0001). The modified method had a coefficient of variation (CV) for a 1 NBU positive control of 10.3% and for the negative control of 9.8%. Based on results on 710 enrollment specimens, a positive CDC inhibitor was defined as ≥ 0.5 NBU. Results were similar when 643 post-enrollment specimens were included. Of 160 enrolled hemophilia B patients, two had HI. All others had NBU ≤ 0.2 at enrollment. CONCLUSION: The CDC experience demonstrates that this modified NBA can be standardized to be within acceptable limits for clinical tests and can be used for national surveillance.
BACKGROUND: As part of a pilot U.S. inhibitor surveillance project initiated at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in 2006, a centralized inhibitor measurement was instituted. OBJECTIVE: To validate a modified method for inhibitor measurement suitable for surveillance of treated and untreated patients. METHODS/ RESULTS: In all, 710 subjects with hemophilia A were enrolled; 122 had a history of inhibitor (HI). Nijmegen-Bethesda assay (NBA) results on 50 split specimens shipped on cold packs and frozen were equivalent (r=0.998). Because 55% of 228 initial specimens had factor (F)VIII activity (VIII:C) present, a heat treatment step was added. Heating specimens to 56°C for 30 min and centrifuging removed FVIII, as demonstrated by a reduction of VIII:C and FVIII antigen to <1 U dL(-1) in recently treated patients. Among specimens inhibitor-negative before heating, one of 159 with negative HI and five of 30 with positive HI rose to ≥ 0.5 Nijmegen-Bethesda units (NBU) after heating. Correlation of heated and unheated inhibitor-positive specimens was 0.94 (P=0.0001). The modified method had a coefficient of variation (CV) for a 1 NBU positive control of 10.3% and for the negative control of 9.8%. Based on results on 710 enrollment specimens, a positive CDC inhibitor was defined as ≥ 0.5 NBU. Results were similar when 643 post-enrollment specimens were included. Of 160 enrolled hemophilia Bpatients, two had HI. All others had NBU ≤ 0.2 at enrollment. CONCLUSION: The CDC experience demonstrates that this modified NBA can be standardized to be within acceptable limits for clinical tests and can be used for national surveillance.
Authors: G Reber; M H Aurousseau; M Dreyfus; B Delahousse; C Caron; M C Trzeciack; M F Aillaud; M H Horellou; Y Laurian; P Si Journal: Haemophilia Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 4.287
Authors: C H Miller; J Benson; D Ellingsen; J Driggers; A Payne; F M Kelly; J M Soucie; W Craig Hooper Journal: Haemophilia Date: 2011-11-21 Impact factor: 4.287
Authors: B Verbruggen; I Novakova; H Wessels; J Boezeman; M van den Berg; E Mauser-Bunschoten Journal: Thromb Haemost Date: 1995-02 Impact factor: 5.249
Authors: Steve Kitchen; Ian Jennings; F Eric Preston; Dianne P Kitchen; Tim A L Woods; Isobel D Walker Journal: Semin Thromb Hemost Date: 2010-02-18 Impact factor: 4.180
Authors: J Michael Soucie; Connie H Miller; Fiona M Kelly; Diane Aschman; Donna DiMichele; Barbara A Konkle; Roshni Kulkarni; Paul E Monahan Journal: Am J Hematol Date: 2014-04-10 Impact factor: 10.047
Authors: Connie H Miller; Anne S Rice; Brian Boylan; Amanda B Payne; Fiona M Kelly; Miguel A Escobar; Joan Gill; Cindy Leissinger; J Michael Soucie Journal: Am J Hematol Date: 2015-09-10 Impact factor: 10.047
Authors: Amanda B Payne; Connie H Miller; Dorothy Ellingsen; Jennifer Driggers; Brian Boylan; Christopher J Bean Journal: Haemophilia Date: 2019-07-29 Impact factor: 4.287
Authors: C H Miller; A S Rice; B Boylan; A D Shapiro; S R Lentz; B M Wicklund; F M Kelly; J M Soucie Journal: J Thromb Haemost Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 5.824