Literature DB >> 29461004

Effects of pre-analytical heat treatment in factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitor assays on FVIII antibody levels.

B Boylan1, C H Miller1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The use of pre-analytical heat treatment (PHT) with the Nijmegen-Bethesda assay (NBA) for inhibitors to factor VIII (FVIII) can remove/destroy infused or endogenous FVIII from patient plasma samples, allowing testing of recently infused patients with haemophilia. Two PHT methods have been described as follows: heating to 56°C for 30 minutes and heating to 58°C for 90 minutes. Data examining the effects of PHT on anti-FVIII IgG4 , the antibodies known to correlate most closely with the presence of FVIII inhibitors, are limited. AIM: To assess the effect of PHT on the levels of detectable anti-FVIII IgG4 .
METHODS: Nijmegen-Bethesda assay-positive specimens were incubated at 56, 58 or 60°C for 90 minutes, and anti-FVIII IgG4 was measured by fluorescence immunoassay (FLI) at 30-minute intervals. The effects of PHT on the ability of recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) to inhibit detection of patient antibodies by FLI was also examined to assess the stability of rFVIII under the various PHT conditions tested.
RESULTS: Levels of anti-FVIII IgG4 showed little change following incubations at 56°C (mean 101% of original value at 30 minutes and 100% at 60 minutes) but decreased upon exposure to 58°C (mean 85% at 30 minutes and 66% at 60 minutes). In addition, heating to 56°C effectively decreased the ability of rFVIII to block antibody binding compared to unheated rFVIII.
CONCLUSION: The optimal temperature for PHT in the FVIII NBA is 56°C. Higher temperatures may lead to loss of inhibitory antibodies.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complications; factor VIII; factor VIII inhibitor test; haemophilia A; immunology; inhibitor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29461004      PMCID: PMC6072565          DOI: 10.1111/hae.13435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haemophilia        ISSN: 1351-8216            Impact factor:   4.287


  14 in total

1.  Definitions in hemophilia: communication from the SSC of the ISTH.

Authors:  V S Blanchette; N S Key; L R Ljung; M J Manco-Johnson; H M van den Berg; A Srivastava
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 5.824

2.  Pre-analytical heat treatment and a FVIII ELISA improve Factor VIII antibody detection in acquired haemophilia A.

Authors:  Paul Batty; Sean Platton; Louise Bowles; K John Pasi; Daniel P Hart
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 6.998

3.  Validation of Nijmegen-Bethesda assay modifications to allow inhibitor measurement during replacement therapy and facilitate inhibitor surveillance.

Authors:  C H Miller; S J Platt; A S Rice; F Kelly; J M Soucie
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.824

4.  Antibodies to factor VIII. I. Variations in stability of antigen-antibody complexes in hemophilia A.

Authors:  J P Allain; D Frommel
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  The Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay for factor VIII:C inhibitors: improved specificity and reliability.

Authors:  B Verbruggen; I Novakova; H Wessels; J Boezeman; M van den Berg; E Mauser-Bunschoten
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 5.249

6.  Limit of detection and threshold for positivity of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention assay for factor VIII inhibitors.

Authors:  C H Miller; B Boylan; A D Shapiro; S R Lentz; B M Wicklund
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 5.824

7.  Distinct characteristics of antibody responses against factor VIII in healthy individuals and in different cohorts of hemophilia A patients.

Authors:  Shawn F J Whelan; Christoph J Hofbauer; Frank M Horling; Peter Allacher; Martin J Wolfsegger; Johannes Oldenburg; Christoph Male; Jerzy Windyga; Andreas Tiede; Hans Peter Schwarz; Friedrich Scheiflinger; Birgit M Reipert
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Anti-factor VIII antibodies of hemophiliac patients are frequently directed towards nonfunctional determinants and do not exhibit isotypic restriction.

Authors:  J G Gilles; J Arnout; J Vermylen; J M Saint-Remy
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1993-10-15       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Heat treatment of samples improve the performance of the Nijmegen-Bethesda assay in hemophilia A patients undergoing immune tolerance induction.

Authors:  Silmara Aparecida de Lima Montalvão; Alini Camargo Tucunduva; Andrea Luísa de Almeida Sambo; Erich Vinicius De Paula; Samuel de Souza Medina; Margareth Castro Ozelo
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.944

10.  Detection and IgG subclass analysis of antibodies to factor VIII in multitransfused haemophiliacs and healthy individuals.

Authors:  P Gautier; Y Sultan; A Parquet-Gernez; F Meriane; C Guerois; A Derlon
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.287

View more
  9 in total

1.  The effect of pathogen inactivation on cryoprecipitate: a functional and quantitative evaluation.

Authors:  Reed W Kamyszek; Matthew W Foster; Brooke A Evans; Keaton Stoner; Jessica Poisson; Amudan J Srinivasan; J Will Thompson; M Arthur Moseley; Micah J Mooberry; Ian J Welsby
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 2.  Laboratory testing for factor VIII and IX inhibitors in haemophilia: A review.

Authors:  C H Miller
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.287

3.  Evaluation of pre-analytic heat treatment protocol used in the CDC Nijmegen-Bethesda assay for heat inactivation of extended half-life haemophilia treatment products.

Authors:  Amanda B Payne; Dorothy Ellingsen; Jennifer Driggers; Christopher J Bean; Connie H Miller
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 4.287

4.  Detailed analysis of anti-emicizumab antibody decreasing drug efficacy, using plasma samples from a patient with hemophilia A.

Authors:  Makoto Kaneda; Ryohei Kawasaki; Naoki Matsumoto; Hiroto Abe; Yoshihito Tashiro; Yuta Inokuchi; Hideyuki Yasuno; Mariko Sasaki-Noguchi; Tetsuhiro Soeda; Yasushi Yoshimura; Toshiaki Oka
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 16.036

Review 5.  Acquired Hemophilia A: Current Guidance and Experience from Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Allyson M Pishko; Bhavya S Doshi
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2022-05-11

6.  International recommendations on the diagnosis and treatment of acquired hemophilia A.

Authors:  Andreas Tiede; Peter Collins; Paul Knoebl; Jerome Teitel; Craig Kessler; Midori Shima; Giovanni Di Minno; Roseline d'Oiron; Peter Salaj; Victor Jiménez-Yuste; Angela Huth-Kühne; Paul Giangrande
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 9.941

7.  Pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, safety, and preliminary efficacy of subcutaneous turoctocog alfa pegol in previously treated patients with severe hemophilia A (alleviate 1).

Authors:  Robert Klamroth; Clemens Feistritzer; Ute Friedrich; Steven R Lentz; Kirsten Reichwald; Marek Zak; Pratima Chowdary
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 5.824

Review 8.  An Update on Laboratory Diagnostics in Haemophilia A and B.

Authors:  Jens Müller; Wolfgang Miesbach; Florian Prüller; Thomas Siegemund; Ute Scholz; Ulrich J Sachs
Journal:  Hamostaseologie       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.145

9.  Evaluation of CDC's Hemophilia Surveillance Program - Universal Data Collection (1998-2011) and Community Counts (2011-2019), United States.

Authors:  Laura A Schieve; Vanessa R Byams; Brandi Dupervil; Meredith A Oakley; Connie H Miller; J Michael Soucie; Karon Abe; Christopher J Bean; W Craig Hooper
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2020-09-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.