Literature DB >> 10071004

Postmarketing surveillance and adverse drug reactions: current perspectives and future needs.

T Brewer1, G A Colditz.   

Abstract

Spontaneous reporting systems like MEDWATCH can be effective in revealing unusual or rare adverse events that occur with the use of medications, and such reports may often be sufficient to assign causality. However, spontaneous reports do not reliably detect adverse drug reactions (ADRs) that occur widely separated in time from the original use of the drug or that represent an increased risk of an adverse event that occurs commonly in populations not exposed to the drug. In these situations, spontaneous reports alone do not provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the adverse event was an ADR. Identification of ADRs associated with long-term administration of drugs for chronic diseases also remains problematic. Methods to evaluate ADRs using data from clinical trials, medical records, and computerized databases of medication users and nonusers must be developed to complement spontaneous reporting systems. Without these methods, potentially important ADRs will remain undetected, and spurious associations between adverse outcomes and medications or devices will remain unchallenged.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10071004     DOI: 10.1001/jama.281.9.824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  63 in total

1.  Hematologic dyscrasia associated with ticlopidine therapy: evidence for causality.

Authors:  F L Paradiso-Hardy; C M Angelo; K L Lanctôt; E A Cohen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-11-28       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Manufacturer's drug interaction and postmarketing adverse event data: what are appropriate uses?

Authors:  W K Kraft; S A Waldman
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Implementation of the harmonized EU isotretinoin Pregnancy Prevention Programme: a questionnaire survey among European regulatory agencies.

Authors:  Ineke Crijns; Sabine Straus; Michiel Luteijn; Christine Gispen-de Wied; June Raine; Lolkje de Jong-van den Berg
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Texas pharmacists' opinions on reporting serious adverse drug events to the Food and Drug Administration: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Paul Gavaza; Carolyn M Brown; Star Khoza
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2010-07-23

5.  Temporal data mining for adverse events following immunization in nationwide Danish healthcare databases.

Authors:  Henrik Svanström; Torbjörn Callréus; Anders Hviid
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Ocular safety of Viagra, (sildenafil citrate).

Authors:  A M Laties; F T Fraunfelder
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1999

Review 7.  Recent developments in gene transfer: risk and ethics.

Authors:  Jonathan Kimmelman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-01-08

8.  Re-examining our approach to the approval and use of new drugs.

Authors:  Shoo K Lee
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Life-threatening adverse drug reaction to paclitaxel. Postmarketing surveillance.

Authors:  A Ruiz-Casado; J Calzas; J García; A Soria; J Guerra
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 10.  Swedish registers to examine drug safety and clinical issues in RA.

Authors:  J Askling; C M Fored; P Geborek; L T H Jacobsson; R van Vollenhoven; N Feltelius; S Lindblad; L Klareskog
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-01-13       Impact factor: 19.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.