Literature DB >> 24254451

Biomechanical assessment of unilateral pedicle screws plus contralateral transfacetopedicular screws after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with two cages.

Zhong-Lin Xue1, Zhong-Xian Chen, Chao-Hua Fu, Hong-Jun Lei, Xiang-Wei Yuan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the biomechanical stability of unilateral pedicle screws (UPS) plus contralateral transfacetopedicular screws (TFPS) after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with two cages.
METHODS: Range of motion (ROM) testing was performed in 28 fresh-frozen human cadaveric lumbar spine motion segments. The sequential test configurations included supplemental constructs after TLIF such as UPS, UPS plus contralateral TFPS and bilateral pedicle screws (BPS). All test specimens were fixated in the normal lordotic lignment, then mounted in a three-dimensional (3-D) motion testing machine and fixed to the load frame of a six degrees of freedom spine simulator. Each of the test constructs were subjected to three load-unload cycles in each of the physiologic planes generating flexion-extension, right-left lateral bending and right-left axial rotation load-displacement curves. Statistical analysis was performed on the ROM data. Comparison of data was performed by repeated-measures analysis of variance for independent samples followed by Bonferroni analysis for multiple comparison procedures.
RESULTS: The ROMs for UPS, BPS and UPS plus TFPS fixation after TLIF were significantly smaller than those of the intact spine in all modes. The ROM for UPS plus TFPS fixation was between the largest for UPS and the smallest for BPS. The differences between ROMs of UPS and UPS plus TFPS were significant for both lateral bending and rotation. There were no significant differences between BPS and UPS plus TFPS in any mode.
CONCLUSION: Because the UPS construct provides the least stability, especially during lateral bending and rotation, it should be used prudently. After TLIF with two cages, UPS plus TFPS provides stability comparable to that of TLIF with BPS. It is thus an acceptable option in minimally invasive surgery.
© 2013 Chinese Orthopaedic Association and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanical assessment; Pedicle screws; Transfacetopedicular screw; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24254451      PMCID: PMC6583472          DOI: 10.1111/os.12075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1757-7853            Impact factor:   2.071


  35 in total

1.  Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar spinal fusion.

Authors:  K S Suk; H M Lee; N H Kim; J W Ha
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technique, complications, and early results.

Authors:  W S Rosenberg; P V Mummaneni
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Radiographic analysis of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of adult isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Brian K Kwon; Scott Berta; Scott D Daffner; Alexander R Vaccaro; Alan S Hilibrand; Jonathan N Grauer; John Beiner; Todd J Albert
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2003-10

4.  A biomechanical comparison of supplementary posterior translaminar facet and transfacetopedicular screw fixation after anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Sung-Min Kim; T Jesse Lim; Josemaria Paterno; Daniel H Kim
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2004-07

Review 5.  Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature.

Authors:  Paul Park; Hugh J Garton; Vishal C Gala; Julian T Hoff; John E McGillicuddy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Isolated L4-L5 fusions using the variable screw placement system: unilateral versus bilateral.

Authors:  M B Kabins; J N Weinstein; K F Spratt; E M Found; V K Goel; J Woody; H A Sayre
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1992-03

7.  Biomechanical analysis of unilateral fixation with interbody cages.

Authors:  Hsiang-Ho Chen; Hung-Hsueh Cheung; Wei-Kai Wang; Allen Li; Kung-Chia Li
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Unilateral transforaminal posterior lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): indications, technique, and 2-year results.

Authors:  Thomas G Lowe; A David Tahernia; Michael F O'Brien; David A B Smith
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2002-02

9.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results.

Authors:  James D Schwender; Langston T Holly; David P Rouben; Kevin T Foley
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2005-02

10.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Basil M Harris; Alan S Hilibrand; Paul E Savas; Anthony Pellegrino; Alexander R Vaccaro; Sorin Siegler; Todd J Albert
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.