Literature DB >> 24252973

A comprehensive analysis of patients with malreduced ankle fractures undergoing re-operation.

Mikko T Ovaska1, Tatu J Mäkinen, Rami Madanat, Veikko Kiljunen, Jan Lindahl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to determine the most common surgical errors resulting in early re-operation following ankle fracture surgery.
METHODS: We performed a chart review to determine the most common types of malreductions that led to early re-operation following ankle fracture surgery. From 2002 to 2011, we identified 5,123 consecutive ankle fracture operations in 5,071 patients. Seventy-nine patients (1.6%) which underwent re-operation due to malreduction detected in postoperative radiographs. These patients were compared with an equal number of age- and sex-matched controls which did not need further surgery.
RESULTS: The most common indication for re-operation was syndesmotic malreduction (47 of 79 patients, 59%). Four main types of errors related to syndesmotic reduction or fixation were identified, with the most common being fibular malpositioning within the tibiofibular incisura. Other indications for re-operation were fibular shortening and malreduction of the medial malleolus. Fracture dislocation, fracture type, posterior malleolar fracture, associated medial malleolar fracture, duration of index surgery, and fixation of an associated medial malleolar fracture with other than two parallel screws were also associated with re-operation. Correction of the malreduction was successfully achieved in the majority (84%) of cases needing further surgery.
CONCLUSION: Early re-operation after ankle fracture surgery was most commonly caused by errors related to syndesmotic reduction or failure to restore fibular length. In the majority of cases, postoperative malreduction was successfully corrected in the acute setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24252973      PMCID: PMC3890139          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-2168-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  40 in total

1.  Detection of fibular torsional deformities after surgery for ankle fractures with a novel CT method.

Authors:  Attila Vasarhelyi; Jessica Lubitz; Philip Gierer; Georg Gradl; Klaus Rösler; Werner Hopfenmüller; Kaj Klaue; Thomas W F Mittlmeier
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.827

2.  Limitations of standard fluoroscopy in detecting rotational malreduction of the syndesmosis in an ankle fracture model.

Authors:  Meir Marmor; Erik Hansen; Hyun Kyu Han; Jenni Buckley; Amir Matityahu
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.827

3.  Diagnosing syndesmotic instability in ankle fractures.

Authors:  Michel Pj van den Bekerom
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2011-07-18

4.  Risk factors for post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the ankle: an eighteen year follow-up study.

Authors:  Anne Lübbeke; Davide Salvo; Richard Stern; Pierre Hoffmeyer; Nicolas Holzer; Mathieu Assal
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Malreduction of the tibiofibular syndesmosis in ankle fractures.

Authors:  Michael J Gardner; Demetris Demetrakopoulos; Stephen M Briggs; David L Helfet; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.827

6.  Predictors of functional outcome following transsyndesmotic screw fixation of ankle fractures.

Authors:  Brad Weening; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Increased rates of wound complications with locking plates in distal fibular fractures.

Authors:  T Schepers; E M M Van Lieshout; M R De Vries; M Van der Elst
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  The functional consequence of syndesmotic joint malreduction at a minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  H Claude Sagi; Anjan R Shah; Roy W Sanders
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  Risk factors for periprosthetic ankle joint infection: a case-control study.

Authors:  Bernhard Kessler; Parham Sendi; Peter Graber; Markus Knupp; Lukas Zwicky; Beat Hintermann; Werner Zimmerli
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Reconstructive osteotomy of fibular malunion: review of the literature.

Authors:  Remco J A van Wensen; Michel P J van den Bekerom; René K Marti; Ronald J van Heerwaarden
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2011-04-06
View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  [Chronic ankle joint instability: in unrecognized distal rupture of the syndosmosis and malunion of the distal fibula].

Authors:  C Michelitsch; Y P Acklin; K Stoffel; H Bereiter
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  [Syndesmosis injuries at the ankle].

Authors:  S Rammelt; E Manke
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  An update on the evaluation and treatment of syndesmotic injuries.

Authors:  S Rammelt; P Obruba
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  New landmarks for ideal positioning of syndesmotic screw: a computerised tomography based analysis and radiographic simulation.

Authors:  Arvind Kumar; Jigyasa Passey; Lakshay Goel; Dushyant Chouhan; Akhil Agnihotri; Shishir Chauhan; Surabhi Gupta; Rizwan Khan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Malleolar tips as reference points for positioning of syndesmotic screw: A preliminary CT based analysis.

Authors:  Arvind Kumar; Lakshay Goel; Dushyant Chouhan; Akhil Agnihotri; Shishir Chauhan; Jigyasa Passey
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-09-16

6.  Audit changes practice-a simple education intervention can lead to better outcome in ankle fracture surgery.

Authors:  Amin Kheiran; Veronica Roberts; Balvinder Rana; Jitendra Mangwani
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-04-08

7.  Surgical Treatment of Ankle Syndesmosis Injuries with Syndesmosis Elastic Hook.

Authors:  Jian-Yun Miao; Qing-Jun Liu; Bin Lin; Lin-Xin Guo
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-11-20       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Syndesmotic InternalBraceTM for anatomic distal tibiofibular ligament augmentation.

Authors:  Markus Regauer; Gordon Mackay; Mirjam Lange; Christian Kammerlander; Wolfgang Böcker
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2017-04-18

9.  [Application of anatomical approach osteoligaments repair technique in treatment of pronation ankle fractures].

Authors:  Zhenhui Sun; Yu Chen; Hui Zhang; Nan Li; Tao Zhang; Xinlong Ma; Zhi Yang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-11-15

10.  [Clinical analysis of full-repair strategy under small incision for closed Lauge-Hansen pronation-external rotation type ankle fracture].

Authors:  Heng Yang; Yu Chen; Zhuojun Yi; Hui Zhang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-06-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.