BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic ankle joint infection is a feared complication of total ankle arthroplasty because the implant fails in the majority of cases. However, risk factors for developing these infections are unknown. METHODS: We aimed to determine risk factors for infection in a matched case-control study that included twenty-six patients with periprosthetic ankle joint infection and two control groups, each consisting of fifty-two patients. RESULTS: The prevalence of periprosthetic ankle joint infection within our cohort was 4.7%. Four infections (15%) had a hematogenous origin and twenty-two (85%), an exogenous origin. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen, followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci. Preoperative predisposing factors associated with infection included prior surgery at the site of infection (odds ratio [OR] = 4.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.98 to 21.35, and OR = 4.78, 95% CI = 1.53 to 14.91, in comparison with the two control groups) and a low American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score (35.8 versus 49.8 and 47.6 in the two control groups, p ≤ 0.02). The mean duration of the index surgery was significantly longer in the case group than in both control groups (119 versus eighty-four and ninety-three minutes, p ≤ 0.02). After surgery, persistent wound dehiscence (OR = 15.38, 95% CI = 2.91 to 81.34, p = 0.01, in comparison with both control groups) and secondary wound drainage (OR = 7.00, 95% CI = 1.45 to 33.70, and OR = 5.31, 95% CI = 1.01 to 26.78, in comparison with the two control groups, p ≤ 0.04) were associated with the development of a periprosthetic ankle joint infection. CONCLUSIONS: Patients at risk for periprosthetic ankle joint infection following total ankle arthroplasty include those with a history of surgery on the ankle, a low preoperative AOFAS hindfoot score, and a long operative time. Postoperatively, patients with a prolonged wound dehiscence or a secondary wound-healing problem are also at risk for infection.
BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic ankle joint infection is a feared complication of total ankle arthroplasty because the implant fails in the majority of cases. However, risk factors for developing these infections are unknown. METHODS: We aimed to determine risk factors for infection in a matched case-control study that included twenty-six patients with periprosthetic ankle joint infection and two control groups, each consisting of fifty-two patients. RESULTS: The prevalence of periprosthetic ankle joint infection within our cohort was 4.7%. Four infections (15%) had a hematogenous origin and twenty-two (85%), an exogenous origin. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen, followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci. Preoperative predisposing factors associated with infection included prior surgery at the site of infection (odds ratio [OR] = 4.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.98 to 21.35, and OR = 4.78, 95% CI = 1.53 to 14.91, in comparison with the two control groups) and a low American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score (35.8 versus 49.8 and 47.6 in the two control groups, p ≤ 0.02). The mean duration of the index surgery was significantly longer in the case group than in both control groups (119 versus eighty-four and ninety-three minutes, p ≤ 0.02). After surgery, persistent wound dehiscence (OR = 15.38, 95% CI = 2.91 to 81.34, p = 0.01, in comparison with both control groups) and secondary wound drainage (OR = 7.00, 95% CI = 1.45 to 33.70, and OR = 5.31, 95% CI = 1.01 to 26.78, in comparison with the two control groups, p ≤ 0.04) were associated with the development of a periprosthetic ankle joint infection. CONCLUSIONS:Patients at risk for periprosthetic ankle joint infection following total ankle arthroplasty include those with a history of surgery on the ankle, a low preoperative AOFAS hindfoot score, and a long operative time. Postoperatively, patients with a prolonged wound dehiscence or a secondary wound-healing problem are also at risk for infection.
Authors: Michał Michalik; Alfred Samet; Adrianna Podbielska-Kubera; Vincenzo Savini; Jacek Międzobrodzki; Maja Kosecka-Strojek Journal: Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob Date: 2020-06-04 Impact factor: 3.944